"Logan's Run" no longer Fiction |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : "Logan's Run" no longer Fiction
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
That was fast work! Anti-Establishment Tabloid does it again | |
| ID: 1301519 · | |
|
It is the duty of any responsible newspaper to inform the public of serious wrongdoings and injustices, that they might otherwise not be aware of. In cases like the Pathway, the Mail did a service to the community by highlighting such a malpractice. It is doing it again today via articles on the immunity given to tax evaders, and the fiddling of GCSE grades. That is investigative journalism at its best. | |
| ID: 1301635 · | |
It is the duty of any responsible newspaper to inform the public of serious wrongdoings and injustices Where did you get that pap?! It is their duty to make money for the shareholder. They have no other duty. Murdoch makes sure every reporter working for him knows that. ____________ | |
| ID: 1301689 · | |
|
It is SUPPOSED to be the duty of any responsible newspaper to inform the public of serious wrongdoings and injustices. That clearly is not so in the case of Murdoch publications. Wouldn't it be nice if someone took him up a dark alley and gave him a good duffing up, and his empire was shut down, the world wwould be a better place. | |
| ID: 1301694 · | |
That was fast work! Anti-Establishment Tabloid does it again All very distressing, though, while the Mail and the Telegraph (and perhaps some posters here) have suggested it's the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) program that's a fault: the LCP recommendations make it very clear that: source ____________ I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... | |
| ID: 1301699 · | |
It is SUPPOSED to be the duty of any responsible newspaper to inform the public of serious wrongdoings and injustices. That was the line some time ago. However the lawyers, bless their souls, proved in court that the fiduciary duty to the shareholder overrides any other duty, such as informing the public of wrongdoing. Any reporter/editor who doesn't know this will quickly find themselves out of a job and any manager who doesn't enforce this in bankruptcy court unable to pay the shareholders their tons of flesh for breaching his duty. What? You are editor. You have a story about wrongs and you have a page 3 girl photo. You have only so much ink and paper in your budget. Which do you run? Which one brings in more advertising money? That is the one you run! ____________ | |
| ID: 1301701 · | |
|
No, an idealistic young journalist who wants to change the world soon learns he can't print anything that requires thought if he wants to stay in business. | |
| ID: 1301709 · | |
...Short-term thinking is liberalism. And not thinking at all is Tea Party conservatism. T.A. | |
| ID: 1301749 · | |
...Short-term thinking is liberalism. +1 ____________ In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams | |
| ID: 1301753 · | |
...Short-term thinking is liberalism. Thinking long term is Libertarianism. ____________ | |
| ID: 1301773 · | |
It is SUPPOSED to be the duty of any responsible newspaper to inform the public of serious wrongdoings and injustices. Im getting so sick and tired of hearing this fiduciary duty crap!!! Maybe the damn lawyers need to be horse whipped in front of the Supreme Court and be sued for for fiscal malefeasance. When making money overcomes any moral obligations its damn plain wrong. That law needs to be changed . But as long as we have a lying, stealing, whats in it for me congrass, that will never happen. ____________ | |
| ID: 1301782 · | |
|
Excellent reply. +1 | |
| ID: 1301784 · | |
|
I think the Supreme Court needs to be dragged out of the building an tarred and feathered for Citizens United and other fiduciary duty rulings. Yes we MUST change the law! | |
| ID: 1301793 · | |
I think the Supreme Court needs to be dragged out of the building an tarred and feathered for Citizens United and other fiduciary duty rulings. Yes we MUST change the law! Agreed 100% ____________ -Dave #2 | |
| ID: 1302077 · | |
|
lets go back 100 years and repeal the " money is free speech" nonsense. This basically tells people that the wealthy have more free speech than the poor. that is stale horse puckey | |
| ID: 1302579 · | |
lets go back 100 years and repeal the " money is free speech" nonsense. This basically tells people that the wealthy have more free speech than the poor. that is stale horse puckey Well, it won't change anything other than they will have to pay tax on it. They will still buy more ads than the poor. However I'm for a more basic change. That a corporation is a license and any condition the legislature sees fit can be put on that license, including a restriction on speech. ____________ | |
| ID: 1302634 · | |
|
beginning to stray way off topic here. | |
| ID: 1302638 · | |
beginning to stray way off topic here. Perhaps if someone stayed out of the US political topics there might be reciprocal behavior, too much to hope for I'm sure ... ____________ | |
| ID: 1302644 · | |
|
At least my posts/questions were on topic. | |
| ID: 1302652 · | |
beginning to stray way off topic here. The problem is that US politics just about affect everybody else on the planet, so expressing our views is probably legitimate as it might just modify your stance so that the US doesn't become the most disliked nation. P.S. Thanks for taking this position away from us in the UK, it tended to make us paranoid. | |
| ID: 1302664 · | |
Message boards : Politics : "Logan's Run" no longer Fiction
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |