British Colonialism

Message boards : Politics : British Colonialism
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 5 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30608
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1292902 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 19:32:44 UTC

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2012/10/201210610143126968.html
Britain's brutal rule in Kenya on the docks

Decades-old struggle for justice over crackdown on Kenyan rebellion goes to court, opening retribution's door.

Nairobi, Kenya - The British colonial officers ordered the Kenyans off the crowded bus, hunting for insurgents who had brazenly challenged the empire's rule.

It was just before Christmas in 1957. Mbithuka Kimweli was travelling with his wife Naomi and their three young children. The officers demanded to know his involvement with the "Mau Mau" anti-colonial movement.

They separated Naomi from the children, blindfolded and beat her, then raped her with a glass bottle. Nearby, they castrated her husband with a pair of pliers.

"I denied any knowledge of the Mau Mau, yet they destroyed me," Mbithuka Kimweli says.

The abuses were part of a systematic campaign of torture conducted by the British to suppress the Mau Mau uprising in the 1950s and early '60s. The anti-British group had launched a guerrilla war against British settlers and Kenyan loyalists from the forests of central Kenya.

The panicked colonial administration detained more than one million people, most of whom, like the Kimwelis, had nothing to do with Mau Mau. Some remained incarcerated for as long as 10 years.

According to the Kenya Human Rights Commission, about 90,000 people were executed, tortured, or maimed during the rebellion.

Naomi Kimweli did not think, as she lay for weeks in King George hospital in Nairobi, that the men who tortured her and her husband would ever be held accountable.

But 55 years later, justice will now be served. Justice Richard McCombe ruled Friday in London that the British government's Foreign and Common Wealth Office must answer for crimes committed more than half a century ago in Kenya.

In Nairobi, elderly Kenyans - many the victims of torture under British rule - waited anxiously at the Kenya Human Rights Commission for the verdict. George Morara, the commission's officer in charge of the case, received the call from London.

"Temeshinda kesi yetu!" Morara excitedly told the crowd in Kiswahili, a Swahili language. "We have won our case."

The elderly Mau Mau jumped and danced in age-defying ways.

Also closely following McCombe's decision were Indians, Malaysians, Cypriots, and Guyanese - others who lived and suffered under British rule. Cases have been filed across the former British empire's vast expanse seeking reparations for colonial-era abuses.


ID: 1292902 · Report as offensive
Profile John Clark
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 99
Posts: 16515
Credit: 4,418,829
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1292905 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 19:39:41 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2012, 19:43:45 UTC

Don't forget these same self styled Mau Mau terrorists murdered, by machete, thousands of their own people (not Kikuyu tribe - tribes other than their own) and did the same to British settlers.

So, why are we accused of these suppression techniques when the disease was far far worse.
It's good to be back amongst friends and colleagues



ID: 1292905 · Report as offensive
bobby
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Mar 02
Posts: 2866
Credit: 17,789,109
RAC: 3
United States
Message 1292909 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 19:47:43 UTC - in response to Message 1292905.  

Don't forget these same self styled Mau Mau terrorists murdered, by machete, thousands of their own people (not Kikuyu tribe - tribes other than their own) and did the same to British settlers.

So, why are we accused of these suppression techniques when the disease was far far worse.


Because the Brits were meant to be the upholders of law and order. "The others did worse things than us" is little consolation to the innocents mentioned in article quoted by Gary.
I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

ID: 1292909 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30608
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1292918 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 20:13:47 UTC - in response to Message 1292905.  

Don't forget these same self styled Mau Mau terrorists murdered, by machete, thousands of their own people

That is their own business ...
(not Kikuyu tribe - tribes other than their own) and did the same to British settlers.

The British settler; there to steal the land and all it has to produce from someone who owned it before by force of army. A thief. And it claims to be protecting the very people they are stealing from. Perhaps death is a bit strong sentence for thievery, but if there isn't a civil court system to try the thief ... seems like a reasonable punishment.

So, why are we accused of these suppression techniques when the disease was far far worse.

Such an admission of guilt. That rape and castration of the people you are there to protect are a valid method of protection. Perhaps it is time for Imperial Rome to invade the Britain again and rule it for a century or so.


ID: 1292918 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24876
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1292924 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 20:35:42 UTC - in response to Message 1292918.  

Don't forget these same self styled Mau Mau terrorists murdered, by machete, thousands of their own people

That is their own business ...
(not Kikuyu tribe - tribes other than their own) and did the same to British settlers.

The British settler; there to steal the land and all it has to produce from someone who owned it before by force of army. A thief. And it claims to be protecting the very people they are stealing from. Perhaps death is a bit strong sentence for thievery, but if there isn't a civil court system to try the thief ... seems like a reasonable punishment.

So, why are we accused of these suppression techniques when the disease was far far worse.

Such an admission of guilt. That rape and castration of the people you are there to protect are a valid method of protection. Perhaps it is time for Imperial Rome to invade the Britain again and rule it for a century or so.



I recall a little country called Vietnam. Were the "Briteesh" there?
ID: 1292924 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30608
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1292928 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 20:50:35 UTC - in response to Message 1292924.  

Don't forget these same self styled Mau Mau terrorists murdered, by machete, thousands of their own people

That is their own business ...
(not Kikuyu tribe - tribes other than their own) and did the same to British settlers.

The British settler; there to steal the land and all it has to produce from someone who owned it before by force of army. A thief. And it claims to be protecting the very people they are stealing from. Perhaps death is a bit strong sentence for thievery, but if there isn't a civil court system to try the thief ... seems like a reasonable punishment.

So, why are we accused of these suppression techniques when the disease was far far worse.

Such an admission of guilt. That rape and castration of the people you are there to protect are a valid method of protection. Perhaps it is time for Imperial Rome to invade the Britain again and rule it for a century or so.



I recall a little country called Vietnam. Were the "Briteesh" there?

The French were. And a fine mess they made. Seems the Australians were there, British proxies? Then some idiots from a couple of different places decided to use Vietnam to prove how much better they were than the other. But I don't remember settlers in Vietnam after the French, nor the extraction of wealth.

ID: 1292928 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24876
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1292932 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 20:53:17 UTC - in response to Message 1292928.  
Last modified: 8 Oct 2012, 20:54:26 UTC

Don't forget these same self styled Mau Mau terrorists murdered, by machete, thousands of their own people

That is their own business ...
(not Kikuyu tribe - tribes other than their own) and did the same to British settlers.

The British settler; there to steal the land and all it has to produce from someone who owned it before by force of army. A thief. And it claims to be protecting the very people they are stealing from. Perhaps death is a bit strong sentence for thievery, but if there isn't a civil court system to try the thief ... seems like a reasonable punishment.

So, why are we accused of these suppression techniques when the disease was far far worse.

Such an admission of guilt. That rape and castration of the people you are there to protect are a valid method of protection. Perhaps it is time for Imperial Rome to invade the Britain again and rule it for a century or so.



I recall a little country called Vietnam. Were the "Briteesh" there?

The French were. And a fine mess they made. Seems the Australians were there, British proxies? Then some idiots from a couple of different places decided to use Vietnam to prove how much better they were than the other. But I don't remember settlers in Vietnam after the French, nor the extraction of wealth.



My Lai for starters.......

....followed by dousing your own troops with "Agent Orange".
ID: 1292932 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30608
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1292942 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 21:12:59 UTC - in response to Message 1292932.  

My Lai for starters.......

Didn't take 50+ years to admit there was a problem and the individual got his due. Seems like the Brits were following orders, so when is the Queen going to serve time for ordering it?

ID: 1292942 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24876
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1292954 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 21:26:09 UTC - in response to Message 1292942.  

My Lai for starters.......

Didn't take 50+ years to admit there was a problem and the individual got his due. Seems like the Brits were following orders, so when is the Queen going to serve time for ordering it?


& Agent Orange?
ID: 1292954 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30608
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1292975 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 22:38:02 UTC - in response to Message 1292954.  

& Agent Orange?

What does friendly fire have to do with this?

ID: 1292975 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30608
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1292977 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 22:43:04 UTC - in response to Message 1292947.  

so when is the Queen going to serve time for ordering it?

You know better than that Gary. Her Majesty or any other monarch has no direct executive control over the UK armed forces. That is carried out by the Chief of the Defence Staff, and the heads of the various armed Services. They are directed by the Prime Minister of the day advised by COBRA.

Yes, I know the Queen has no power today, but does she have the responsibility?

A person here wanted to join some things, just wanted him to think about joining things before he makes such statements again.

However there are people who ordered it. I wonder if they will ever be brought to justice?

ID: 1292977 · Report as offensive
bobby
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Mar 02
Posts: 2866
Credit: 17,789,109
RAC: 3
United States
Message 1292981 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 23:04:50 UTC - in response to Message 1292977.  

so when is the Queen going to serve time for ordering it?

You know better than that Gary. Her Majesty or any other monarch has no direct executive control over the UK armed forces. That is carried out by the Chief of the Defence Staff, and the heads of the various armed Services. They are directed by the Prime Minister of the day advised by COBRA.

Yes, I know the Queen has no power today, but does she have the responsibility?

A person here wanted to join some things, just wanted him to think about joining things before he makes such statements again.

However there are people who ordered it. I wonder if they will ever be brought to justice?


You may have conceded the point a little hastily. Rule of foreign dominions was under Governors or Governors-General. These appointments were (and continue to be) officially made by the Crown, and exercised Royal prerogative directly. These appointments also exercised control of armed forces deployed to their jurisdiction. Seems to me the British Monarch may have some fairly direct culpability.
I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

ID: 1292981 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24876
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1292985 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 23:13:05 UTC - in response to Message 1292975.  

& Agent Orange?

What does friendly fire have to do with this?


Friendly Fire? Are you joking? Agent Orange was dropped throughout North Vietnam, so Americans had colonised the place then, had they?
ID: 1292985 · Report as offensive
Nick
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 11
Posts: 4344
Credit: 3,313,107
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1292991 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 23:32:45 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2012, 23:34:04 UTC

I wonder if it's time now for Britain to seek retribution through the courts
regarding all those beastly things done to us over the years. Take Denmark to
court over their rape, pillage and murder of whole villages in Northern England.
The Norwegians too for the way the Vikings did exactly the same as the Danes
years earlier. The German Saxons too performed no better when they raided us and
not lets forget France. For we had a wretched time when those Normans invaded
us. I'd say also that it's perhaps time too for the USA to fully compensate the
American Indians for the wretchedness they suffered under the hands of the white Americans.
As for Kenya then if we can trace any surviving culprits then we'll
bring them too boot. Compensation for them, well for those who directly suffered
then I see no reason why not. As for the current Kenyan Government then I see no
reason why they should not recompense those who suffered under them post
Colonialism....a fat chance of that.
The Kite Fliers

--------------------
Kite fliers: An imaginary club of solo members, those who don't yet
belong to a formal team so "fly their own kites" - as the saying goes.
ID: 1292991 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24876
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1292992 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 23:34:46 UTC - in response to Message 1292991.  

Don't forget Oliver Cromwell..... :)
ID: 1292992 · Report as offensive
Nick
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 11
Posts: 4344
Credit: 3,313,107
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1292993 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 23:38:13 UTC - in response to Message 1292992.  

Don't forget Oliver Cromwell..... :)

....yes and the Irish too, they have claims of retribution against Oli'.


The Kite Fliers

--------------------
Kite fliers: An imaginary club of solo members, those who don't yet
belong to a formal team so "fly their own kites" - as the saying goes.
ID: 1292993 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20140
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 1292997 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 23:51:29 UTC

How far back into whatever assumed 'history' do you wish to go? A history written by 'which side'?

Note that with an exponential increase in the world's grievances as you delve further into history, you have a jihadist's dream of perpetual conflict generating ever more grievances... Can we not instead look forwards to a grievance-free future?

A little mutual understanding and positive apolitical education can go a long way to true cooperation and peace.


Also, can someone explain to Gary how to spell British please?


All on our only world,
Martin

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 1292997 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24876
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1292998 - Posted: 8 Oct 2012, 23:55:07 UTC - in response to Message 1292993.  

Don't forget the Yanks..... after what Del-boy said on Letterman "We interfered in your politics 200 years ago when we sailed up the river & burnt down the White House".

There you go, another claim against the British government as the troops were under orders from the crown.

But should any Yank take that up, we'll counter sue for the loss of life & damage to our economy when The Yankee government coerced its ally to illegally invade Iraq under the pretence of Weapons of Mass Destruction....

Hows that for joining things?
ID: 1292998 · Report as offensive
bobby
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Mar 02
Posts: 2866
Credit: 17,789,109
RAC: 3
United States
Message 1293017 - Posted: 9 Oct 2012, 1:13:07 UTC

So much hand waving, so little discussion of the thread's topic. Guess the OP must've hit a nerve.
I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

ID: 1293017 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24876
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1293028 - Posted: 9 Oct 2012, 1:47:14 UTC - in response to Message 1293017.  

So much hand waving, so little discussion of the thread's topic. Guess the OP must've hit a nerve.


Really? your thought processes are either slightly off centre or totally whacko.

Because the Brits were meant to be the upholders of law and order. "The others did worse things than us" is little consolation to the innocents mentioned in article quoted by Gary.


IT seems that JC's post hit one of your nerves.

Perhaps it is time for Imperial Rome to invade the Britain again and rule it for a century or so.


Perhaps the rest of the world should finally give America what Charles Lindbergh campaigned for.....

Total isolation!

BTW, Vietnam, Afghanistan & Iraq is hand waving? Tell me as an Ex-Brit now residing in yankee land, you wish to ignore yankeeland atrocities & run down your country of birth?

Many inhumane incidents have occured in war with no nation free of their own dark secrets. However, so called professional soldiers videoing themselves urinating on the dead & this in the 21st century?

Definitely need isolating from the rest of us!

ID: 1293028 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 5 · Next

Message boards : Politics : British Colonialism


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.