Black Holes part 2

FOR STARTERS --Johnnie my son,

Can you opine on whether or not an electron is a black hole.

Doesn't it meet the Schwarzchild radius definition ??

FOR STARTERS --Johnnie my son,

Can you opine on whether or not an electron is a black hole.

Doesn't it meet the Schwarzchild radius definition ??

Same question again Martin,
Do you know what a Barycenter is?

Yes. Do you?

Show me "scientific proof", testable, repeatable proof, that black holes are NOT Barycenters!

And so jelly sweets can be coloured pink and French honey can be coloured purple. Your point is?

Martin i am very arrogant and very aggressive. But i tell you one thing, i have a very good reason to be arrogant and aggressive! I'm very serious about what i do.

'Tis good to be impassioned. You still need to recant your lies and deceit slurs that you have made against honest scientists. Especially against those on and behind these forums.


Note that I consider myself to be a scientist and an engineer. You personally insult me and my kind?

Regards,
Martin

I plead Gödel's incompleteness theorem, the 5th Amendment, and insanity.

I will continue to insult those who stand on their high horses and preach bad science. I will continue to point out blatant bad science.

John.

High horses, like this:

I haven't met anyone here who seems to have knowledge of the subjects involved in genetics

?

Or this:

I'm very good with genetics

?

It probably helps to have an understanding of good science before pointing out bad science.

Scientists seem to think that there is energy out there in the universe that at present we can't see or detect, or even tap into to use. The Starwars series called it the "Force". We have named it dark matter or dark energy. It may not exist, it may do, we do not at this juncture know one way or the other.

There is no point anyone getting hot under the collar about it, because it can't be proved or disproved. We are all entitled to our opinions.

I will continue to insult those who stand on their high horses and preach bad science. I will continue to point out blatant bad science.

I think that anybody who insults other volunteers should be banned from these message boards.
Tullio

The rules here are quite clear. No real need for further comment.

No messages intended to annoy or antagonize other people, or to hijack a thread.
No messages that are deliberately hostile or insulting.
No abusive comments involving race, religion, nationality, gender, class or sexuality.

The Mods apply those rules fairly and reasonably. I have to yet again agree with Sirius.

The rules here are quite clear. No real need for further comment.

No messages intended to annoy or antagonize other people, or to hijack a thread.
No messages that are deliberately hostile or insulting.
No abusive comments involving race, religion, nationality, gender, class or sexuality.

The Mods apply those rules fairly and reasonably. I have to yet again agree with Sirius.

Scientists seem to think that there is energy out there in the universe that at present we can't see or detect, or even tap into to use. The Starwars series called it the "Force". We have named it dark matter or dark energy. It may not exist, it may do, we do not at this juncture know one way or the other.

There is no point anyone getting hot under the collar about it, because it can't be proved or disproved. We are all entitled to our opinions.

I will continue to insult those who stand on their high horses and preach bad science. I will continue to point out blatant bad science.

That is not a helpful statement Johnney and you may wish to reconsider that. You should learn not to get frustrated just because people choose not to agree with you.

If there is bad science, or mistakes in our current understanding, we need to find the mistakes.

John.

If there is bad science, or mistakes in our current understanding, we need to find the mistakes.

John.

Then you need to find those mistakes. Criticising without any backup is insulting to all.

If there is bad science, or mistakes in our current understanding, we need to find the mistakes.

John.

Then you need to find those mistakes. Criticising without any backup is insulting to all.

Whats your point?

I have found the mistakes, and i point them out here on these forums. And i do provide all the information needed to understand what i am explaining.

Example;
My claim; There are no black holes.
Evidence/Proof; They cannot be detected with any man-made scientific instrument.
Explanation; They are Barycenters

Whats difficult about that? It seems simple to me? What part don't you understand?

John.

Hang on here for one minute! I insulted "astronomers and cosmologists" in general, and their science, and i named the groups. Even worse, i'm attacking them for what i know is bad science.