Black Holes part 2

I came across this article, and thought it was worth sharing.
http://science.time.com/2012/10/04/how-to-escape-from-a-black-hole/?hpt=hp_t3

Steve
____________
Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

Steve,
Exactly why did you think the article was worth sharing? I don't get it! Its more of the usual lies.

Its full to the brim with the usual lies and deceit that clever astronomers like to feed out to the unsuspecting public to make you think they are really clever. When truth is, they haven't a clue what's going on in the Black hole. And they can't figure out why the maths don't add up?

Steve just accept my personal scientific findings. There are no Black holes, they don't exist. They are theoretical constructs that only exist inside the computers and the minds of astronomers. Black holes are the result of a mathematical error that started with Isaac Newton, was further propagated by Albert Einstein, and continues to this present day to deceive the whole scientific world. Yes, let me say that again - The Whole World is being deceived by lazy astronomers who won't get out from behind the lens of their telescope and check that all the maths they are using are correct!

For God sake Steve, just take a look at the science fiction picture they posted in the article. [Johnney-Laughs-out-lode-to-himself] In the image, you can see the black hole. What a joke! The reality should be that you could never see the black hole. And nobody has any astronomical image that shows anything that remotely resembles that image. So because black holes don't exist, they have to use a make-e-uppy image....LOL. Its just like you would do with children to make them believe their bed time story.



Wake up Steve, wake up. They are telling you a story about an Emperor that has no cloths on. And they describing the Emperor in great detail and telling you tonnes of stuff that they made up. And they are asking you to "believe" on blind faith that the Emperor really is wearing cloths. When truth is, in this case, there is no cloths and there is no Emperor.

But Johnney Guinness took a look at the Emperor and saw that the Emperor was naked. And Johnney Guinness tells it like it is. There are no black holes!

John.
____________

And let me add to my last statement just to add clarity.

You have no idea just how much poorly written science i had to read through to eventually dig out where the error was buried. I read through pages and pages of fictitious astronomy and cosmology that was utterly buried up the brim with maths equations, and numbers, and computer algorithms, and government super computers crunching astronomical amounts of data to calculate fictitious astronomical theories. Pages and pages of science papers written by mathematicians and Nobel prize winners, physicists, astronomers, cosmologists, number crunchers and genius's. I was at it for years, but i cracked it in the end.

And none of them could get it! None of them could see what i see. Why? What the hell is wrong with these people? And what the hell is wrong with science fans that follow science that they swallow whatever news story is fed out by the guy with the biggest telescope. Is it some kind of Freudian slip that the male mind can't resist big telescopes? So you accept whatever they say, even if you can't see it, and can't measure it? What the hell is wrong with the world?

I'm a simple man and do things in a simple way. I cut through, purify and provide clarity where clarity is needed. This error was difficult to find. But when i set out a task to find what's broken, i don't stop until i find the part that has failed. This is how i learned to fix machines. This is how i learned to find what's broken when things are broken. There are no Black holes.

John.
____________

... lies and deceit that clever astronomers like to feed out to the unsuspecting public to make you think they are really clever. When truth is, they haven't a clue what's going on ...

... You have no idea just how much poorly written science i had to read through to eventually dig out where the error was buried. ...

... lies and deceit that clever astronomers like to feed out to the unsuspecting public to make you think they are really clever. When truth is, they haven't a clue what's going on ...

Johnney,

I take great exception to your foul unsubstantiated language.

Show your proof for how the rest of the world is wrong, or retract and recant and apologise for such foul gutter comments. Claims of "lies and deceit" have no place in science.


Show your case or forever be lost in your own "lies and deceit"...

Regards,
Martin

Dr. Eric Korpela, Project scientist
Eric is an astronomer.

Black holes exist at the center of every Galaxy but there are also smaller black holes within our Galaxy. They are identified by the X-ray emissions of matter falling into them. A black hole at the center of M87 galaxy has been identified by a network of radiotelescopes connected in VLBI mode. See www.eventhorizontelescope.org..
Tullio

Forgive him Tullio he knows not what he reads. I dont claim to understand all science. But I do have a firm grip on the basics.

Also the firm evidence and video evidence that APOD has posted in the past clearly shows the signs of a black hole. If these aren't black holes then they are some unknown force that look and act as the objects we describe as black holes.

Sorry to say that Discussing science with JG is like talking to a wall. You always get the same monocolored answer.

Quite honestly I really didnt think this was a topic for debate. Its a really cool article. Why anyone would think it was part of a debate is beyond me

... lies and deceit that clever astronomers like to feed out to the unsuspecting public to make you think they are really clever. When truth is, they haven't a clue what's going on ...

Johnney,

I take great exception to your foul unsubstantiated language.

Show your proof for how the rest of the world is wrong, or retract and recant and apologise for such foul gutter comments. Claims of "lies and deceit" have no place in science.


Show your case or forever be lost in your own "lies and deceit"...

Regards,
Martin

... You have no idea just how much poorly written science i had to read through to eventually dig out where the error was buried. ...

Then please demonstrate whatever error it is that you have found, and the correction and correct solution.


We await your Revelation with interest.

Regards,
Martin

Skil, John is an Irishman who takes great, self admitted pride in his gift of gab. The only explanations I can come up with for his posts are he is mad or he has been putting these forums on for years. I say he is a colossal joker and a very good one.

Same question again Martin,
Do you know what a Barycenter is?

Show me "scientific proof", testable, repeatable proof, that black holes are NOT Barycenters!

Martin i am very arrogant and very aggressive. But i tell you one thing, i have a very good reason to be arrogant and aggressive! I'm very serious about what i do.