Time for the BBC to go? |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : Time for the BBC to go?
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 . . . 8 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
There is a lot (and I mean a lot) of unmitigated sh*te broadcast on US TV. You really have to sift through to find the good stuff. You won't offend me. I hate the majority of our programming over here; I hate watching TV advertisements, and I have watched the news with great interest in regards to the large media conglomerates trying to make time shifting (recording a program on a DVR to watch later while skipping ads) illegal. I've been very tempted to just get rid my TV subscription altogether and just keep my internet access. Nearly any TV show I do watch can be found online anyway - but then I'm still forced to watch advertisements unless I obtain the show illegally (bitorrent), which I really don't want to do. There are some decent shows on BBC that I've seen over here, but of the few really good US shows we have (House, M.D., The Mentalist, Seasons 1-6 of CSI just to name a few), I'd rather watch them! ;-D | |
| ID: 1290868 · | |
|
You say "nutjobs". Two of the people featured in the BBC program came over as having real concerns about what happened that day. They spoke to experts and people who were there and then they started to question what they believed, and a third became totally confused as he found some of the theories he held as so important just did not stand up to the truth. | |
| ID: 1290871 · | |
|
That's what clubs, pubs & Internet forums are for.. Gives them free reign to spout their views. | |
| ID: 1290878 · | |
|
Oh dear, the BBC itself making the news.... | |
| ID: 1291641 · | |
|
I think I might have changed my mind: 0851 How on earth did the researchers at Today get away with that? For those not fortunate enough to have seen Red Dwarf, it was first broadcast on BBC in 1988 and ran through until 1999 (source). ____________ I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... | |
| ID: 1292097 · | |
|
Hmmn, not a very good week for the BBC..... | |
| ID: 1293564 · | |
|
Absolutely hilarious! Good job the Yankees in Washington only let them go with just fines, otherwise the BBC would've ended up in the crapper. | |
| ID: 1293849 · | |
|
Gosh, didn't know Area 51 a/k/a the Nevada Test site, was so open access. Only subject to arrest and fine. The signs on the fence for Edwards Air Force Base say that trespassers may be shot on sight. I think we know which one deals with real secret stuff and which one is operated as a tourist attraction. | |
| ID: 1293933 · | |
|
That maybe so. But a point worth making is that anyone held at gunpoint is not, and should not, be a matter for hilarity. People can die in those situations. | |
| ID: 1293939 · | |
That maybe so. But a point worth making is that anyone held at gunpoint is not, and should not, be a matter for hilarity. People can die in those situations. Oh most certainly! Especially when they're a public broadcaster ignoring military trepassing signs..... Well Andrew Maxwell was the host & we all know that the Irish are as thick as 2 planks..... ....maybe that's why they were fined & not shot! ____________ | |
| ID: 1293959 · | |
That maybe so. But a point worth making is that anyone held at gunpoint is not, and should not, be a matter for hilarity. People can die in those situations. Damn right. You don't mess with the military unless you are willing to forfeit your life. And I'll put in another story from a Nevada air force base a couple of decades earlier. Open house. Guy driving a beverage truck. Imbibed a bit too much in the day while the base was open. Leaving the base he misjudged the distance and drove his truck into the wing of a strategic bomber parked on the flight line. MP's with loaded M=16's dragged his sorry butt face down in tarmac for a long time until the Base Commander decided to turn him over to civil authorities. I don't think a standard accident policy was going to cover the $1 million to x-ray the wing spar for cracks. I did say this was a strategic bomber with a $280+ million price tag didn't I? Strategic as in START treaty, meaning someone had to call the Russians and tell this this improbable tail as to why it wasn't operational and they were putting another in its place. I don't know if the base commander had to retire or not. ____________ | |
| ID: 1294042 · | |
The quality of the BBC program is consistently better than US tv. Having lived with both guess what our favourite programmes on TV here in Canada are? The ones the BBC makes and sells abroad. One of the reasons I chucked Cable. ____________ Pluto will always be a planet to me. Cash Donation Specialist | |
| ID: 1294053 · | |
|
How nice for a government run institution...... | |
| ID: 1294101 · | |
|
All this is very sad and a lose/lose situation all round for absolutely everyone. The victims of the alleged abuses, fingers pointed at others for cover ups, a lifetimes reputation in shreds, and a shattered family. Tens of Millions were raised for charity which I think was genuinely done, but after the current revelations may now be seen as tainted money. | |
| ID: 1294111 · | |
|
Oh dear, turning into a right horribus weekus for the BBC...... | |
| ID: 1294709 · | |
|
It seems many in the country agree with me..... | |
| ID: 1296848 · | |
It seems many in the country agree with me..... Come-off it Mike Harding, you know as well as we do why you were sacked. 1). You don't chase after little girls. 2). You don't chase after little boys. 3). You don't grope the female staff. 4). You don't brag about bedding stars granddaughters. 5). You don't sleep with men. 6). You don't go in for wife swapping nor dogging. 7). Your neither a fairy nor a paedo'. Your therefore a miss-fit, a serious risk to all those other BBC staff that do enjoy all those things listed above. In the eyes of the BBC your an oddity...so you know why you were sacked, we do!! ____________ The Kite Fliers -------------------- Kite fliers: An imaginary club of solo members, those who don't yet belong to a formal team so "fly their own kites" - as the saying goes. | |
| ID: 1296949 · | |
|
I'm not sure that post is very helpful at the current time Nick. I'm quite sure that the majority of the BBC's 26,000 staff behave perfectly properly. | |
| ID: 1296950 · | |
I'm not sure that post is very helpful at the current time Nick. I'm quite sure that the majority of the BBC's 26,000 staff behave perfectly properly. Satire o'l boy.......mind you the 26,000 staff aren't all in high profile positions. Through it's incompetence, the BBC has opened itself to ridicule and it will continue to get this until such time as it finally sorts itself out... ...or gets sorted out!! ____________ The Kite Fliers -------------------- Kite fliers: An imaginary club of solo members, those who don't yet belong to a formal team so "fly their own kites" - as the saying goes. | |
| ID: 1296956 · | |
|
| |
| ID: 1296968 · | |
Message boards : Politics : Time for the BBC to go?
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |