Time for the BBC to go? |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : Time for the BBC to go?
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
I find this year to be something out of the ordinary. I suspect Sirius would rather drop the "Bulldog" and just be left with the "Spirit" for now....bottoms-up ol' boy. ____________ The Kite Fliers -------------------- Kite fliers: An imaginary club of solo members, those who don't yet belong to a formal team so "fly their own kites" - as the saying goes. | |
| ID: 1300847 · | |
|
Naw, I have ..... | |
| ID: 1300851 · | |
|
Well, seeing that this week you have decided to ditch North Korea and become German, I should ask one of these | |
| ID: 1300953 · | |
|
Newsnight is certainly going to be interesting this evening..... | |
| ID: 1301275 · | |
|
Do remember that it is the Mails avowed aim to bring down this government, and in particular mount regular personal attacks against Cameron. Always take what they say with a large dose of scepticism. They may publicise scandals, but it is mainly for their circulations benefit not the general publics. I would rather listen to the independent or the Torygraph. | |
| ID: 1301319 · | |
|
I must admit I have moved newspaper from there to the Times ... | |
| ID: 1301327 · | |
|
Bought one the other day John, admittedly for the crossword, jut to see if I could till have a bash at it! The Mail is really dire these days, and quite anti establishment. | |
| ID: 1301372 · | |
The Mail is really dire these days, and quite anti establishment. With old fogeys like this still in power, it's no wonder they are..... Old Fogey who should be pensioned off Another Fly-Tipping debacle At least on this one there is an honest gentleman amongst a den of muppets! "Tony Perks from the district council said the letter was perhaps "overly aggressive" and that they "don't like upsetting residents". He said: "I'm certainly disappointed in what we've done." Well done Tony (I bet you get some right ribbing over your name). ____________ | |
| ID: 1301414 · | |
Bought one the other day John, admittedly for the crossword, jut to see if I could till have a bash at it! The Mail is really dire these days, and quite anti establishment. Shame the BBC don't do crosswords! Newsnight claims, but BBC refuses to name Didn't like the Saville affair BBC & now trying to CYA? "The terms of reference were an important restriction. It's also fair to say at that time, and we're going back to the mid- to late 1990s here, at that time the idea that senior public figures; politicians; celebrities could be involved in child abuse was seen as a bit far-fetched," he told Newsnight/the Bureau of Investigative Journalism." Hmmn, no "redtop tabloids" here, but a world renown online "redtop" ____________ | |
| ID: 1301511 · | |
Bought one the other day John, admittedly for the crossword, jut to see if I could till have a bash at it! The Mail is really dire these days, and quite anti establishment. Can't be Sir Peter Morrison for although sited already as a pedo' he's now dead. This current one is still living and everyone one in parliament most probably by now will know who he is. ____________ The Kite Fliers -------------------- Kite fliers: An imaginary club of solo members, those who don't yet belong to a formal team so "fly their own kites" - as the saying goes. | |
| ID: 1301546 · | |
Old Fogey who should be pensioned off VETERAN Tory Ken Clarke has admitted he doesn’t know what his new Government job is. Ken, 72, was sacked as Justice Secretary two months ago and appointed Minister without Portfolio. But he described the role — for which taxpayers pay him £98,740 a year — as “particularly mysterious and baffling”. Don't lets all be naive here, Cameron is far too clever a politician, you don't get to be PM otherwise. When it became clear that Clarke was no longer wanted in a front line role, he had to go. But it was borne in mind how many years he had been around holding various senior Government posts. It was also clear he wasn't going to go quietly. Therefore it would not have made any sense to simply sack him and say bye bye. Clarke could be a very dangerous future enemy if not handled carefully, and everyone knew that. That is why he was given the sinecure position of Minister without Portfolio which guarantees him a continuing seat in the cabinet, judged enough to placate him. All that these recent comments are meaning is that Clarke has accepted his position with bad grace. OK folks, nothing to see here, please move on .... | |
| ID: 1301639 · | |
Why? you thread owner? "On 12 May 2009, The Daily Telegraph reported that Clarke had "flipped" his council tax. He had told the Parliamentary authorities that his main home was in his Rushcliffe constituency, enabling him to claim a second homes allowance on his London home and leaving the taxpayer to foot the bill for the council tax due on that property. However, he told Rushcliffe Borough Council in Nottinghamshire that he spent so little time at his constituency address that his wife Gillian should qualify for a 25% council-tax (single person's) discount, saving the former chancellor around £650 per year. Land registry records showed that Clarke did not have a mortgage on his home in Nottinghamshire, where he has lived since 1987. He instead held a mortgage on his London house, which he had most recently charged to the taxpayer at £480 per month" Yep, nothing new here, so let's move on. Next Baghdad Broadcasting Company's topic is: - How do we exhort more from the serfs - The Licence Payers? ____________ | |
| ID: 1301708 · | |
|
Come-on Sirius, Clarkie is only trying to boost his pension pot. | |
| ID: 1301770 · | |
Come-on Sirius, whey-hay...LOADS-A-MONEEEEEEY.... the secrets they're not divulging is that Harry Enfield was successfully cloned more than once..... ....hence the Loads A Moneeeeeeee muppets in power....... ...they're saying they haven't got enough, so we gotta pay more! ____________ | |
| ID: 1301779 · | |
Come-on Sirius, whey-hay...LOADS-A-MONEEEEEEY.... What!! they want to be able to buy two houses in London at the tax payers expense then? Having all these politicians now has got to be old hat. The local councils should be able to deal with all the paraphernalia that the residence go to see their M.P's about. The old system has been running for too long now so needs an overhaul, a new way. Just like the BBC due for a very long-overdue overhaul. Ban soaps, ban reality shows and ban politicians from ever speaking on the T.V ever again....the tele is for entertainment purposes and politicians are not entertainers. There we go, a new vision for the BBC, to be informative, entertaining and totally independent of view and of any outside influences too....sounds like the BBC of about 50 years ago then. ____________ The Kite Fliers -------------------- Kite fliers: An imaginary club of solo members, those who don't yet belong to a formal team so "fly their own kites" - as the saying goes. | |
| ID: 1301820 · | |
|
Careful there me boy.......you'll have Sir Humphrey on your case about us being in the 21st century...... | |
| ID: 1301835 · | |
Careful there me boy.......you'll have Sir Humphrey on your case about us being in the 21st century...... I think Humpies out for the evening, we'll just have to drag him kicking and screaming into the 21st century. Once settled then he'll encompass all that it has to offer with great joy and pleasure and then relish all the challenges that it presents him. But he will not be allowed to appear on the BBC though!! ____________ The Kite Fliers -------------------- Kite fliers: An imaginary club of solo members, those who don't yet belong to a formal team so "fly their own kites" - as the saying goes. | |
| ID: 1301840 · | |
|
Hi guys & gals, the race is on for this year's Christmas Number one...... | |
| ID: 1302069 · | |
|
Hmmn, attempting to divert attention from your "friends" at the BBC Del-boy? | |
| ID: 1303564 · | |
|
You do wonder then is the investigations getting to close to some of | |
| ID: 1303592 · | |
Message boards : Politics : Time for the BBC to go?
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |