Are Robots taking our jobs?

Message boards : Politics : Are Robots taking our jobs?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Johnney Guinness
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 06
Posts: 3093
Credit: 2,652,287
RAC: 0
Ireland
Message 1287555 - Posted: 25 Sep 2012, 0:43:20 UTC
Last modified: 25 Sep 2012, 0:48:36 UTC

Are Robots taking our jobs?

This is a TED talk with Andrew McAfee;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMF-Z74C1QE (14 minute video)

Every new factory that opens up is full to the brim with automated Robots that make every product under the Sun. But for each new Robot that makes a new product, this takes the jobs of three people. Right now today there are millions of Robots making millions of products.

Are the Robots making everybody unemployed?
Are they taking our jobs?
Maybe its a good thing, maybe we don't want to work as slaves on factory lines?

Watch the robots taking YOUR job;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkNVhtOCcrE

John.
ID: 1287555 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1287578 - Posted: 25 Sep 2012, 3:18:57 UTC - in response to Message 1287555.  

Robots cost less to feed than people and they are more accurate.
ID: 1287578 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19047
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1287592 - Posted: 25 Sep 2012, 4:26:26 UTC - in response to Message 1287555.  

this takes the jobs of three people


Bit optimistic there aren't you. If you do the figures of machine working 24/7/365 and people doing 35/week then there needs to be a min of 5 people working. And that assumes the people work for every one of the 35 hours and is not sick or want holidays etc. etc.

So I would say "this takes the jobs of seven people"

But you would need 7 robot maintenance, repair people at a higher rate of pay.
ID: 1287592 · Report as offensive
Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 12273
Credit: 8,569,109
RAC: 79
United States
Message 1287598 - Posted: 25 Sep 2012, 4:38:17 UTC - in response to Message 1287592.  

this takes the jobs of three people


Bit optimistic there aren't you. If you do the figures of machine working 24/7/365 and people doing 35/week then there needs to be a min of 5 people working. And that assumes the people work for every one of the 35 hours and is not sick or want holidays etc. etc.

So I would say "this takes the jobs of seven people"

But you would need 7 robot maintenance, repair people at a higher rate of pay.


Whichever answer Johnney receives first, he will disagree with and tell us the old book will reveal in a few years how very wrong we are.
ID: 1287598 · Report as offensive
Profile Johnney Guinness
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 06
Posts: 3093
Credit: 2,652,287
RAC: 0
Ireland
Message 1287606 - Posted: 25 Sep 2012, 4:53:24 UTC - in response to Message 1287592.  

this takes the jobs of three people


Bit optimistic there aren't you. If you do the figures of machine working 24/7/365 and people doing 35/week then there needs to be a min of 5 people working. And that assumes the people work for every one of the 35 hours and is not sick or want holidays etc. etc.

So I would say "this takes the jobs of seven people"

But you would need 7 robot maintenance, repair people at a higher rate of pay.

WinterKnight,
I was being conservative. But your right. Robots don't get sick, they don't get hangovers, they don't complain, they won't sue you if their parts break, and they don't want redundancy payment when your finished with them. In fact, when your finished with the robot, your can sell it on. And as you say, they work 24/7/365 and never back answer you.

So 1 robot does the work of many people. Why would anyone employ a human being? If you hire humans, your just drawing trouble on yourself.

John.
ID: 1287606 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19047
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1287616 - Posted: 25 Sep 2012, 5:26:31 UTC - in response to Message 1287606.  

this takes the jobs of three people


Bit optimistic there aren't you. If you do the figures of machine working 24/7/365 and people doing 35/week then there needs to be a min of 5 people working. And that assumes the people work for every one of the 35 hours and is not sick or want holidays etc. etc.

So I would say "this takes the jobs of seven people"

But you would need 7 robot maintenance, repair people at a higher rate of pay.

WinterKnight,
I was being conservative. But your right. Robots don't get sick, they don't get hangovers, they don't complain, they won't sue you if their parts break, and they don't want redundancy payment when your finished with them. In fact, when your finished with the robot, your can sell it on. And as you say, they work 24/7/365 and never back answer you.

So 1 robot does the work of many people. Why would anyone employ a human being? If you hire humans, your just drawing trouble on yourself.

John.

But it just causes management confusion not knowing whether the maintenance people should be idle or working.

They would not like to see people idle, but then would get panicy when the maintenance people were working because an idle robot would mean lack of output and a reduction in profits.
ID: 1287616 · Report as offensive
Profile James Sotherden
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 May 99
Posts: 10436
Credit: 110,373,059
RAC: 54
United States
Message 1287688 - Posted: 25 Sep 2012, 12:24:05 UTC

We have robots at work machineing parts 24/7 Thing is they tried to let the robots run unsupervised. The stupid thing didnt know when to make an offset so it would make many bad parts. They finally took the probes out and now we supervise the robot and make our own offsets.

From what I understand its a program issue. The company didnt want to spend the extra cash for the fully autonomus version.

Like others have said, Somebody has to keep an eye on them and fix them.
[/quote]

Old James
ID: 1287688 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30637
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1287727 - Posted: 25 Sep 2012, 13:48:59 UTC

Robots prevent carpal tunnel injuries. They save humans pain and suffering.

ID: 1287727 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19047
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1287747 - Posted: 25 Sep 2012, 15:04:49 UTC

It's been a complaint throughout history, Luddites, weavers complained about the jacquard loom, farm labourers complained about steam engines, etc etc.
ID: 1287747 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30637
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1287751 - Posted: 25 Sep 2012, 15:20:53 UTC - in response to Message 1287747.  

It's been a complaint throughout history, Luddites, weavers complained about the jacquard loom, farm labourers complained about steam engines, etc etc.

I thought farm laborers complained about the short handled hoe?

ID: 1287751 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1287968 - Posted: 26 Sep 2012, 11:12:20 UTC - in response to Message 1287943.  

What we need is a machine that does the work of ten men but takes twelve men to operate it.
ID: 1287968 · Report as offensive
Profile Ex: "Socialist"
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Mar 12
Posts: 3433
Credit: 2,616,158
RAC: 2
United States
Message 1288125 - Posted: 26 Sep 2012, 16:59:43 UTC

Just wait until machines reproduce themselves... Oh, wait.

Ok, that still takes much human intervention. But wait until they can reproduce by themselves in 100% entirety.
#resist
ID: 1288125 · Report as offensive
Profile Ex: "Socialist"
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Mar 12
Posts: 3433
Credit: 2,616,158
RAC: 2
United States
Message 1288127 - Posted: 26 Sep 2012, 17:00:40 UTC - in response to Message 1287968.  

What we need is a machine that does the work of ten men but takes twelve men to operate it.

Lol, next time you see some construction happening you will see just that.
#resist
ID: 1288127 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24879
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1288192 - Posted: 26 Sep 2012, 19:13:27 UTC - in response to Message 1288125.  

Just wait until machines reproduce themselves... Oh, wait.

Ok, that still takes much human intervention. But wait until they can reproduce by themselves in 100% entirety.


I wouldn't mind if they're anything like this.....


ID: 1288192 · Report as offensive
BarryAZ

Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 01
Posts: 2580
Credit: 16,982,517
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1288694 - Posted: 28 Sep 2012, 5:54:33 UTC

But wait, isn't Romney a robot? <smile> -- Representative of bad code though.
ID: 1288694 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19047
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1293192 - Posted: 9 Oct 2012, 13:25:18 UTC

ID: 1293192 · Report as offensive
Profile Johnney Guinness
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 06
Posts: 3093
Credit: 2,652,287
RAC: 0
Ireland
Message 1293197 - Posted: 9 Oct 2012, 13:53:07 UTC - in response to Message 1293192.  

Just a little more info.

Design World - Success in Industrial Robotics Seen Globally

The article says;
"In 2011, about 165,000 industrial robots were sold worldwide"

Those 165,000 robots probably put a million or more people out of work. And to be honest, i think its an underestimated figure. Many more functions in factories are being automated, removing the need for a person.

Machines themselves do the work of hundreds of people. One human man might hand-carve 20 little wooden toys in a day. But you can make a machine that will automatically produce 50,000 toys a day to feed the whole world with that particular toy. So one automated machine in China or South Korea can make thousands of people unemployed in hundreds of countries all over the world.

John.
ID: 1293197 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Politics : Are Robots taking our jobs?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.