Are Robots taking our jobs? |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : Are Robots taking our jobs?
1 · 2 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Are Robots taking our jobs? | |
| ID: 1287555 · | |
|
Robots cost less to feed than people and they are more accurate. | |
| ID: 1287578 · | |
this takes the jobs of three people Bit optimistic there aren't you. If you do the figures of machine working 24/7/365 and people doing 35/week then there needs to be a min of 5 people working. And that assumes the people work for every one of the 35 hours and is not sick or want holidays etc. etc. So I would say "this takes the jobs of seven people" But you would need 7 robot maintenance, repair people at a higher rate of pay. | |
| ID: 1287592 · | |
this takes the jobs of three people Whichever answer Johnney receives first, he will disagree with and tell us the old book will reveal in a few years how very wrong we are. | |
| ID: 1287598 · | |
this takes the jobs of three people WinterKnight, I was being conservative. But your right. Robots don't get sick, they don't get hangovers, they don't complain, they won't sue you if their parts break, and they don't want redundancy payment when your finished with them. In fact, when your finished with the robot, your can sell it on. And as you say, they work 24/7/365 and never back answer you. So 1 robot does the work of many people. Why would anyone employ a human being? If you hire humans, your just drawing trouble on yourself. John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1287606 · | |
this takes the jobs of three people But it just causes management confusion not knowing whether the maintenance people should be idle or working. They would not like to see people idle, but then would get panicy when the maintenance people were working because an idle robot would mean lack of output and a reduction in profits. | |
| ID: 1287616 · | |
|
Yes robots are taking over the more mundane and repetitive tasks. That leaves Man to concentrate on designing better robots! How much more do you think your family car would cost you if it was all built by hand as in the past? We in the UK had a car industry once that was the envy of the world, the trade unions destroyed it. If we had had robots 50 years ago we might have saved Fords at Dagenham. | |
| ID: 1287639 · | |
|
We have robots at work machineing parts 24/7 Thing is they tried to let the robots run unsupervised. The stupid thing didnt know when to make an offset so it would make many bad parts. They finally took the probes out and now we supervise the robot and make our own offsets. | |
| ID: 1287688 · | |
|
Robots prevent carpal tunnel injuries. They save humans pain and suffering. | |
| ID: 1287727 · | |
|
That may well be so Gary, but I think the OP was more generally commenting upon general mechanization taking away human jobs. But even Ford Model T's were built on a production line with mechanical aids. | |
| ID: 1287733 · | |
|
It's been a complaint throughout history, Luddites, weavers complained about the jacquard loom, farm labourers complained about steam engines, etc etc. | |
| ID: 1287747 · | |
It's been a complaint throughout history, Luddites, weavers complained about the jacquard loom, farm labourers complained about steam engines, etc etc. I thought farm laborers complained about the short handled hoe? ____________ | |
| ID: 1287751 · | |
The human damage caused by long-term use of short-handled hoes, which required the user to bend over from the waist to reach the ground, and caused permanent, crippling lower back pain to farm workers, resulted in the California Supreme Court declaring the short-handled hoe to be an unsafe hand tool that was banned under California law.[citation needed] The short-handled hoe that Governor Jerry Brown gave to César Chávez in 1975 was displayed in the California Hall of Fame in 2006. Throughout history man has invented and used tools and implements to aid him in day to day living. As technology advances so do state of the art tools. I remember the first plugboard capstan lathes in the early 1960's, now we have CNC machining centres. V8 cylinder block from solid I defy anyone to watch that 10 minute video and not be impressed. Yes robots are taking over because they are more efficient BUT, someone has to design them and someone has to maintain them. Mankind isn't totally redundant yet. | |
| ID: 1287943 · | |
|
What we need is a machine that does the work of ten men but takes twelve men to operate it. | |
| ID: 1287968 · | |
|
We have, it's called a Government ..... | |
| ID: 1287980 · | |
|
Just wait until machines reproduce themselves... Oh, wait. | |
| ID: 1288125 · | |
What we need is a machine that does the work of ten men but takes twelve men to operate it. Lol, next time you see some construction happening you will see just that. ____________ -Dave #2 | |
| ID: 1288127 · | |
Just wait until machines reproduce themselves... Oh, wait. I wouldn't mind if they're anything like this..... ____________ | |
| ID: 1288192 · | |
|
But wait, isn't Romney a robot? <smile> -- Representative of bad code though. | |
| ID: 1288694 · | |
|
Just a little more info. | |
| ID: 1293192 · | |
Message boards : Politics : Are Robots taking our jobs?
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |