Message boards :
Politics :
This worries me.......
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
Houston Police shoot a wheelchair bound man with one arm in the head because they felt 'threatened'? OK, he did try to stab the officer with a pen. I can see justifying lethal force now. Oh, the officer was trapped......... "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
Donald L. Johnson Send message Joined: 5 Aug 02 Posts: 8240 Credit: 14,654,533 RAC: 20 |
Houston Police shoot a wheelchair bound man with one arm in the head because they felt 'threatened'? Wish that article had a picture of the guy in his wheelchair. Was it a free-rolling or a power chair? The stupid cop couldn't just tip the chair over, immobilize the guy, and free his partner? Or come up from behind and grab the guy's arm, or maybe whack him with his baton/nightstick? He had to shoot him? Sorry, wrong answer. And yes, I have been there and done that. Donald Infernal Optimist / Submariner, retired |
Uli Send message Joined: 6 Feb 00 Posts: 10923 Credit: 5,996,015 RAC: 1 |
Did I read this right the weapon was a pen? Moving this to reasons known. Pluto will always be a planet to me. Seti Ambassador Not to late to order an Anni Shirt |
Terror Australis Send message Joined: 14 Feb 04 Posts: 1817 Credit: 262,693,308 RAC: 44 |
Did I read this right the weapon was a pen? Well, the pen is mightier than the sword..... Wonder what all the "old style" coppers think of the trigger happiness of the current generation of law enforcement officers ? It's happening in Australia too, particularly in the state of Victoria. The police there are developing a real reputation for trigger happiness. T.A. |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
Did I read this right the weapon was a pen? I dont know about down under, But here in the states we have a lot of former military joining the police forces. Take a combat vet who lives by split seconds decisions, He sees a threat he kills it. His buddys in danger he kills the threat post haste. Also the fact that in the states some police departments think they are the military. The dress the same and carry the same weapon. And I do think some are wannabes. Thats just my observation, I could be way wrong. [/quote] Old James |
Donald L. Johnson Send message Joined: 5 Aug 02 Posts: 8240 Credit: 14,654,533 RAC: 20 |
Did I read this right the weapon was a pen? I think that is part of it. So many Police Academies train to react to a threat, not assess the treat and respond accordingly. I see too many news reports where someone with a knife is shot dead rather than even attempt to disarm or subdue with a baton or tazer. And why so often when there are several officers present, do they ALL empty their weapons into the suspect? How about a designated shooter? Saves ammo, and minimizes the threat of collateral damage and civilian injury. Donald Infernal Optimist / Submariner, retired |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30648 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
Did I read this right the weapon was a pen? Such tactics as you suggest require brain power; something trained out of military forces. |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
Such tactics as you suggest require brain power; something trained out of military forces. I find that really offensive. Our sevice men and woman are not brainless robots. One of the hallmarks of the US armed services has been individual initiative. [/quote] Old James |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30648 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
Such tactics as you suggest require brain power; something trained out of military forces. I don't believe I singled out the US armed services. The entire purpose of basic training is to get the recruit to obey orders, even self destructive stupid ones, to break the recruit so they don't think, they just do. As you know there are only three answers; Yes Sir, No Sir, and No excuse Sir. That is not thinking. Blind obedience prevents thinking. This does not speak to the individual, just the institution. |
Sirius B Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24879 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7 |
Sorry, you're in the wrong here. Basic training is to mould the individual into becoming part of a cohesive team. Once that's done, advanced training is commenced to provide the various trades required for each unit for which thinking is required. At this stage, should one be found to be one or more cans short of a sixpack, either further training is provided or it's bye bye time, you're not wanted! |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
Sirus and Chris S , You said it better than I did. Also if an illegal order is given It is the duty of the soldier to disobey. IE such as I want you to kill all those women because they are hiding the rebels. The Nurenburg trials took away that, I was only doing what I was orderd to do bullcrap. Ask Lt. Calley if it worked for him. [/quote] Old James |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30648 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
Chris, you talk about officers. What is the rank you have at the completion of basic training? As to losing it on the battlefield, the US has some experience in that, Lt. William Calley comes to mind as does Abu Ghraib. Sirius, that advance training is how to operate a complex weapon; it isn't officer candidate school. |
Sirius B Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24879 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7 |
Chris, you talk about officers. What is the rank you have at the completion of basic training? Rank at the end of basic training (at least here in the UK) is Private. Advanced training is learning to use a complex weapon? Really? So a radio is a complex weapon? Oh my! An artillery piece is a complex weapon? Really? So a degree is needed to fire one? Need to qualify as an officer to use one? Didn't realise that the US Army is in such disarray that officers are needed to use common equipment! |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
Guy, you are correct the police vs civilian issue is a symptom of a bigger problem. It extends to the top, the us vs them. The current climate is more polarizing than any thing I've seen. |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30648 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
The issue is the "military style"[1] training of police officers. That they are trained to take any unknown as a threat and immediately kill the threat. Perhaps fine in war, but policing is not war. War on Drugs has given carte blanche for this thinking and need to be terminated as does the thinking. [1]Style as it may not be in current fashion with all military forces worldwide. |
Donald L. Johnson Send message Joined: 5 Aug 02 Posts: 8240 Credit: 14,654,533 RAC: 20 |
The issue is the "military style"[1] training of police officers. That they are trained to take any unknown as a threat and immediately kill the threat. Perhaps fine in war, but policing is not war. On that I can wholeheartedly agree with you. Donald Infernal Optimist / Submariner, retired |
bobby Send message Joined: 22 Mar 02 Posts: 2866 Credit: 17,789,109 RAC: 3 |
I think that police training reflects the type of society that the police have to operate in. If they work in a free for all environment with no gun laws, then they don't have much choice but to shoot first and ask questions afterwards. The American police seem to me to be a para-military force anyway, simply because they have to be. There isn't that need in the UK. Right, unarmed civilians are routinely shot to death on the NYC subway. Such a thing would never happen on the Tube. It's all down to the training and the free for all environment. I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30648 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
I think that police training reflects the type of society that the police have to operate in. If they work in a free for all environment with no gun laws, then they don't have much choice but to shoot first and ask questions afterwards. The American police seem to me to be a para-military force anyway, simply because they have to be. There isn't that need in the UK. I can see how it might appear so to someone who doesn't live here. However nothing in the USA gun laws has suddenly changed since the country was founded. Such shoot to kill a cell phone wielding bystander did not exist until very recently. What did change was a "War on Drugs" was declared. The people do not want this. The police are being forced to enforce it and they derive the majority of their revenue from it. The people have lost all respect for the police because they are enforcing laws the people do not want. Repeal the laws which people do not want and lets get back to enforcing the ones they do and perhaps some respect for authority will return. |
Sirius B Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24879 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7 |
Wow & here I was thinking that I'm the "Sarcasm King" of Seti. So if another 9/11 or 7/7 occurs, the police will have to stop, think..."is this really the guy that orchestrated the bombings?" "Let's get on the radio & find out"..... 5 seconds later, he detonates his bomb...... Sorry, in this case the police just cannot win. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.