Same WU takes more time in Lunatics (ATI) than only CPU ?

Message boards : Number crunching : Same WU takes more time in Lunatics (ATI) than only CPU ?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

AuthorMessage
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1286565 - Posted: 22 Sep 2012, 8:22:02 UTC - in response to Message 1286564.  

Currently this cruncher is only showing you have the lunatics application installed for the CPU, and nothing for the GPU.

How come??? I installed Multibeam for ATI dude.

Perhaps a checkbox was missed when doing the Lunatics installation?
Rerun the installer.....and double check what you have selected.
You should not have to do anything else other than run the installer a second time, should not mess anything up.
Just a suggestion.
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1286565 · Report as offensive
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22184
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1286567 - Posted: 22 Sep 2012, 8:24:21 UTC

Currently this cruncher is only showing you have the lunatics application installed for the CPU, and nothing for the GPU.


How come??? I installed Multibeam for ATI dude.


You did it correctly, I read it wrongly

Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1286567 · Report as offensive
Zapiao
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 29 Oct 01
Posts: 110
Credit: 122,278
RAC: 0
Portugal
Message 1286570 - Posted: 22 Sep 2012, 8:29:22 UTC - in response to Message 1286567.  
Last modified: 22 Sep 2012, 8:32:08 UTC

But no one can explain WHY i am having that error? Its because of being a APU Processor?
By your command !!!
ID: 1286570 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1286572 - Posted: 22 Sep 2012, 8:34:57 UTC

In my experience, and I have no ATI cards here, the ' exited with zero status but no 'finished' file' has been due to a computer being tied tight.
Cannot finish certain Boinc operations before a timeout.

Something is using too many computer resources, the Boinc cache is too large, Boinc set to display all tasks instead of just active tasks, comms problems.

Maybe try idling a cpu.....
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1286572 · Report as offensive
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22184
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1286579 - Posted: 22 Sep 2012, 8:53:55 UTC

There are a few reasons for a computer to give the "can't create output file" type errors - here are a few of them
Disk is full.
User allocation of disk space is consumed.
User does not have create/write permission for the data directory.
The "create file" operation fails due to computer glitch.
Anti-virus software gets in the way

There are more, but these are the most common.

One common problem is that the "user" running BOINC/S@H does not have the correct permissions. This will show up as EVERY task failing with this error message, it can be prevented at installation time by doing the installation "for all users", not jut the one that is doing the installation.
Another one that is quite similar in its appearance is the AV software getting in the way - exclude the BOINC/project directories from the AV checking, and make sure BOINC/S@H applications are allowed to write (some AV software allows stopping applications writing non-temporary files)
User allocation is a funny one, because it can be transient - a user deletes a load of files, they go to the waste bin, but for a short time they appear twice against that user's allocation. (I don't use allocations, to prevent this problem).
Hard disk full - self explanatory really!
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1286579 · Report as offensive
Zapiao
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 29 Oct 01
Posts: 110
Credit: 122,278
RAC: 0
Portugal
Message 1286590 - Posted: 22 Sep 2012, 9:47:07 UTC

I am given up on this pc :(
By your command !!!
ID: 1286590 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1286604 - Posted: 22 Sep 2012, 10:51:44 UTC - in response to Message 1286590.  

I am given up on this pc :(

It's only hardware........

I have found a way to best every single hardware problem ever.
Except a total mobo failure. That cannot be beat.
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1286604 · Report as offensive
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22184
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1286634 - Posted: 22 Sep 2012, 12:58:25 UTC

I have to say expecting a dual 1GHz CPU, with a "built in" ATI HD6290 GPU to be anything other than "prosaic" is being a bit of an optimist.
I'd guess (based on the performance of my 2.7GHz, 6 core AMD) that an astopulse would take about six hours on the CPU, and something similar on the GPU (running Lunatics, not stock).

One question - is this processor being used as an add-on to a bigger system, or is it in a standalone PC?
(Silly me - I've just looked at the AMD website - its a notebook processor, so it certainly won't set the fields ablaze with its performance, indeed the lack of information on the AMD site suggests it has had a "chequered history", unlike its logical predecessor, the C-50, it has vanished from the product schedules)
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1286634 · Report as offensive
Urs Echternacht
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 692
Credit: 135,197,781
RAC: 211
Germany
Message 1286829 - Posted: 22 Sep 2012, 21:52:43 UTC

21-09-2012 01:50:58 | | ATI GPU 0: Loveland (CAL version 1.4.1417, 256MB, 223MB available, 88 GFLOPS peak)
21-09-2012 01:50:58 | | OpenCL: ATI GPU 0: Loveland (driver version CAL 1.4.1417 (VM), device version OpenCL 1.1 AMD-APP-SDK-v2.4 (650.9), 256MB, 223MB available)

Try to update to a newer ATI/AMD GPU driver !
_\|/_
U r s
ID: 1286829 · Report as offensive
Zapiao
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 29 Oct 01
Posts: 110
Credit: 122,278
RAC: 0
Portugal
Message 1286865 - Posted: 23 Sep 2012, 0:02:26 UTC - in response to Message 1286829.  

But this one http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=6755411 has a low GPU and it works o why this one doesnt????
By your command !!!
ID: 1286865 · Report as offensive
Zapiao
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 29 Oct 01
Posts: 110
Credit: 122,278
RAC: 0
Portugal
Message 1286894 - Posted: 23 Sep 2012, 2:26:00 UTC

23-09-2012 03:23:09 | | OpenCL: ATI GPU 0: What this means?

Original line: 23-09-2012 03:23:09 | | OpenCL: ATI GPU 0: Loveland (driver version CAL 1.4.1741 (VM), device version OpenCL 1.1 AMD-APP-SDK-v2.4 (650.9), 256MB, 223MB available)

By your command !!!
ID: 1286894 · Report as offensive
Josef W. Segur
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 4504
Credit: 1,414,761
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1286920 - Posted: 23 Sep 2012, 3:31:11 UTC - in response to Message 1286865.  

But this one http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=6755411 has a low GPU and it works o why this one doesnt????

Possibly because that one has 512MB GPU RAM available while your C-60 system only has 256MB assigned to be used by the GPU, and only 768MB of system RAM left for the OS and other things.

Raistmer's C-60 also only has 256MB assigned to the GPU and runs the OpenCL apps successfully, but it has considerably more system RAM than yours and is running a full version of Win7 rather than the starter edition. I don't know those differences are significant, but they could be.
                                                                    Joe
ID: 1286920 · Report as offensive
Zapiao
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 29 Oct 01
Posts: 110
Credit: 122,278
RAC: 0
Portugal
Message 1286933 - Posted: 23 Sep 2012, 4:22:30 UTC - in response to Message 1286920.  
Last modified: 23 Sep 2012, 4:38:28 UTC

Ok but i cant even install lunatics because of this error. I will install only Boinc. Thanks everyone
Ps: and if i change memory settings?
Ps2: i just found that buffer cache was set to 1000 days WTF.
By your command !!!
ID: 1286933 · Report as offensive
Zapiao
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 29 Oct 01
Posts: 110
Credit: 122,278
RAC: 0
Portugal
Message 1287009 - Posted: 23 Sep 2012, 10:09:44 UTC

The period_interations_num only concerns to GPU?
By your command !!!
ID: 1287009 · Report as offensive
Claggy
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4654
Credit: 47,537,079
RAC: 4
United Kingdom
Message 1287011 - Posted: 23 Sep 2012, 10:49:56 UTC - in response to Message 1287009.  

The period_interations_num only concerns to GPU?

It's only for the r390 ATI OpenCL MB app,

Claggy
ID: 1287011 · Report as offensive
Profile Raistmer
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 01
Posts: 6325
Credit: 106,370,077
RAC: 121
Russia
Message 1287193 - Posted: 23 Sep 2012, 18:59:30 UTC - in response to Message 1287009.  

The period_interations_num only concerns to GPU?


Yes, only to OpenCL MultiBeam app.
ID: 1287193 · Report as offensive
Zapiao
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 29 Oct 01
Posts: 110
Credit: 122,278
RAC: 0
Portugal
Message 1287210 - Posted: 23 Sep 2012, 20:19:36 UTC - in response to Message 1287193.  

Thanks Claggy and Raistmer for your help. It s sad having a GPU that doesnt work :(. I will install lunatics and then use "no gpus" cmd to turn a usable gpu in to a UNSUABLE one!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn
By your command !!!
ID: 1287210 · Report as offensive
Claggy
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4654
Credit: 47,537,079
RAC: 4
United Kingdom
Message 1287252 - Posted: 23 Sep 2012, 23:33:10 UTC - in response to Message 1287210.  

You could upgrade the RAM, 750Mb to run Windows 7 and anything else is not a lot, then you could probably adjust BIOS settings to give the GPU more memory,

Claggy
ID: 1287252 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

Message boards : Number crunching : Same WU takes more time in Lunatics (ATI) than only CPU ?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.