Same WU takes more time in Lunatics (ATI) than only CPU ? |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Same WU takes more time in Lunatics (ATI) than only CPU ?
1 · 2 · 3 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
So whats the point of installing lunatics? | |
| ID: 1284605 · | |
|
First, you must mean "similar" work unit; it's impossible to run the "same" workunit on your system twice. | |
| ID: 1284627 · | |
|
Because the remaining time in CPU was about 10h and with lunatics activated i got WUs of 40h to complete. I thought using my ATI i would have WUs completed in minutes. | |
| ID: 1284630 · | |
Because the remaining time in CPU was about 10h and with lunatics activated i got WUs of 40h to complete. I thought using my ATI i would have WUs completed in minutes. You might have received AP units for your GPU. Those take longer than regular MB units. But any "time" shown is simply a "guess" by BOINC. It would probably be considerably less. It looks like you now have some MB ATI units. Let them run (don't abort them) and then compare them to MB CPU units. And don't even look at the completion time estimates. ____________ | |
| ID: 1284639 · | |
and then compare them to MB CPU units ... with similar angle range, see the line "WU true angle range is" in the std_err. It's pointless to compare an 0.4 WU with a VHAR (AR>1.0). ____________ . | |
| ID: 1284727 · | |
|
I have to assume that he is pointing to his laptop pc. That has a APU where the CPU and GPU are on the same chip and share resources. the GPU will not be very fast. It may be about as fast or as slow as your CPU WU's | |
| ID: 1284799 · | |
I have to assume that he is pointing to his laptop pc. That has a APU where the CPU and GPU are on the same chip and share resources. the GPU will not be very fast. It may be about as fast or as slow as your CPU WU's APU C-60. You can not compaire a core i7-3960X plus a AMD/ATI 7900(Tahiti), with an C-60 APU. Optimized or not. Valid WU, both SETI Enhanced stock app. On your i3- M380 and AMD/ATI 5000 (Cedar) you're running the optimized app for AMD/ATI.
OpenCL Platform Name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
Number of devices: 1
Max compute units: 2
Max work group size: 128
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - State: All (340) · In progress (22) · Pending (5) · Valid (2) · Invalid (0) · Error (311) Application: All (340) · Astropulse v505 (0) · AstroPulse v6 (0) · SETI@home Enhanced (340) · SETI@home v7 (0) I'm guessing both hosts are LapTops, which all have serious problems with heat. And thus power consumption, directly influencing your computing power, R(ecent A(verage) C(redit) or 'throughput'. Mobile versions are also always limited by their battery-life, that's why Desk_tops will out-perform mobile devices, at this time. ____________ Knight Who Says Ni N!, OUT numbered................. | |
| ID: 1284819 · | |
|
I was afraid of that. I thought this ATI was good for crunching but i was wrong. | |
| ID: 1284820 · | |
I was afraid of that. I thought this ATI was good for crunching but i was wrong. Well if they don't get too hot they will work, but always be slower compaired to their desktop families. ____________ Knight Who Says Ni N!, OUT numbered................. | |
| ID: 1284826 · | |
I was afraid of that. I thought this ATI was good for crunching but i was wrong. Now my ATI it s about 68ºC. ____________ By your command !!! | |
| ID: 1284851 · | |
I was afraid of that. I thought this ATI was good for crunching but i was wrong. Did you get some performance per $ invested or some performance per watt estimation or your conclusion based exclusively on BOINC time to complete estimates that have nothing near to reality with first few tasks??? ATi as good crunching device as others are. It can be disputed what better or worser only after comparison measure established. Good in one measure can be bad in some another one, btw. And about 68C - it's quite low temp for C-60. It feels quite good at 80C too. I crunch on C-60 netbook almost year already and can say that this APU device definitely faster than my prev Atom based one. And its GPU part faster in SETI (both AP and MB apps) that it's 2 CPU cores part. In performance per invested $ measure it's better. Would it be better in performance per watt measure? Maybe, but can't give answer cause did not checked it. So, be carefull with conclusions based on quite little experience. | |
| ID: 1284971 · | |
|
Thank you Raistmer. | |
| ID: 1284985 · | |
|
The first AP unit I got for my AMD 6670 1GB card (5 days ago) was puzzling. It ran at ~0% GPU load and took something like 24 hours to finish. The load graph showed bumps up to maybe 10% every few minutes. | |
| ID: 1285320 · | |
|
Can you explain how to do that tweakage? " unroll 8, ffa_block 16384, and ffa_block_fetch 8192 " where i set this? | |
| ID: 1285322 · | |
|
I can tell you what I did, I'm hardly the expert. Raistmer is, he wrote the code in case you didn't know. | |
| ID: 1285332 · | |
|
I dont crunch astropulse, so it will work for seti? | |
| ID: 1285339 · | |
I dont crunch astropulse, so it will work for seti? 1. No, it would not, MB app uses different set of params to tune. 2. C-60 is low end GPU so it should work quite good with stock defaults (for AP). Or you trying to speedup your secondary ATi cruncher, HD5xxx based one ? 3. Cause you said you run not AP but "SETI" (MB, i.e. MultiBeam, perhaps) you running with app_info, not stock. I see no completed GPU tasks for C-60 host but few for HD5xxx host. From stderr: Number of period iterations for PulseFind setted to:20 Number of app instances per device setted to:1 you could try to set number of instances to 2 for app and decrease number of iterations (if not experience GUI lags). All this can be done via <cmdline> field in app_info.xml file for MultiBeam app. <cmdline>-instances_per_device 2 -period_iterations_num 10</cmdline> Also, <count>0.5</count> should be used for r390 of MultiBeam app you running if you want to run 2 instances at once. | |
| ID: 1285553 · | |
I dont crunch astropulse, so it will work for seti? What happens increasing the period iterations? ____________ By your command !!! | |
| ID: 1285617 · | |
What happens increasing the period iterations? One big kernel call divided on few smaller ones. This help to fight with GUI lags but can decrease performance a little, not in big degree actually. | |
| ID: 1285621 · | |
|
How can i configure to use only GPU in the cc_config file? | |
| ID: 1285737 · | |
Message boards : Number crunching : Same WU takes more time in Lunatics (ATI) than only CPU ?
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |