Dark energy is real, say "astronomers"

Dark energy is real, say "astronomers"

News from the Royal Astronomical Society;
Dark energy, a mysterious substance thought to be speeding up the expansion of the Universe is really there, according to a team of astronomers at the University of Portsmouth and LMU University Munich.

After a two-year study the scientists conclude that the likelihood of Dark energy's existence stands at 99.996 per cent. Their findings are published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Watch a Youtube video by astronomer Tony Darnell discussing this news;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpomfWEr5Dk (8 minute video)

Royal Astronomical Society News article;
http://www.ras.org.uk/news-and-press/219-news-2012/2167-dark-energy-is-real-say-portsmouth-astronomers

Science paper;
http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.2125

- - - - - - -
My personal opinion - By Johnney Guinness;
I firmly stand over my claim that there is no Dark energy and there is no Dark matter! I say this with 100% confidence! I have no doubt what so ever!

These guys, these astronomers, have a very big shock coming to them when they find out that all their years of work is proven to be complete rubbish.

I actually can't believe they have the arrogance to claim they are 99.996 per cent sure that Dark energy exists. I mean 99.996% is absolute confidence. They only way you could claim that much confidence is if you had multiple ways of checking your measurements. But they don't! All they are doing is, in simple terms, looking at pictures!

There is a big shock coming.......soon!

John.
____________

Read this;
Dark energy
Tullio

I've had a Revelation.

Amazing insight...

I've just deciphered what Johnney 'means' all along...



He must be swimming and dreaming in the Dark Energy of...


GUINNESS!


(He could sign up for some adverts ;-) )

I'm sure it's all well researched :-)


Cheers,
Martin


... Or is there something there of substance? Is this all viral marketing on the trail to launching his world beater book?...
____________
Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS!
See new freedom Mageia2
The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)

Read this;
Dark energy
Tullio

Ok, i read it. So what? Its more of the same rubbish?

John.

First, it is not rubbish. It is science. Second, why using the double quotes on the 'astronomers' term?. They are doing research, you are only talking.
Tullio

I've had a Revelation.

GUINNESS!

(He could sign up for some adverts ;-) )

I'm sure it's all well researched :-)

Cheers,
Martin

... Or is there something there of substance? Is this all viral marketing on the trail to launching his world beater book?...

Johnney, you cannot qualify other people's research as "rubbish" even if you don't agree with them. You are simply insulting them.
Tullio

I have no knowledge of Johnney's theories since he does not publish them and hence I cannot judge them.
Tullio

Johhney knows that for the most part I agree with his interpretations of both Testaments of the Bible. I agree with previous ET visitations, I agree certain ancient monuments may have been built with alien knowledge although not actual help. But I think he is mistaken about this maths flaw.

Big bang
Dark matter
Dark energy
Black holes
Time travel
Higgs Boson

They are all things that we think may exist, some theoretically, but at our current stage of knowledge we can't prove it. Johnney has looked into things trying to find a clue to understand how it might be proved. In doing so he found this 90% approximation in quantum mechanics relating to orbitals. He thinks he has found a fatal maths flaw, I am convinced he hasn't. I think he has convinced himself though that he is right.

Lets face it for over 100 years since Einstein, there have been very many thousands of PhD scientists all over the world, researching these very conundrums, with the latest equipment, how likely is it that they would have not seen this apparent "flaw". How likely is it that our friend in Ireland has done that without their background and resources. I think he has fallen into the trap of wanting too badly to find answers and grabbed at a straw in the wind.

All scientific experiments are carried out and written up allowing for an element of error. They use the Poisson distribution curve and statistics to state the results within a +/- confidence & probability level.

Instead the diagrams are approximate representations of boundary or contour surfaces where the probability density |ψ(r,θ,φ)|2 has a constant value, chosen so that there is a certain probability (for example 90%) of finding the electron within the contour.

Chris,
Thank you for the vote of confidence. I know it can be difficult to trust some of the things i say, but i do present some very good arguments!

The 2 discoveries are indeed separate;
1. The "Old book".
2. The Maths error.

But there is a connection between the two that i rarely talk about. I have said very little about what connects the two discoveries. When i discuss the maths error, i try to keep the discussion to pure science and nothing else. I try not to mention the old book. People discussing science don't want to hear me blathering on about God.

But Chris, i will tell you the connection between the maths error and the old book because it unavoidable - The front page, or the front cover of the old book has something on it. Whats on the front cover, which i haven't fully decoded yet, is God's name. But its written in code. And God's name also has the maths error contained in his name. Or if i say it more correctly, God's name does NOT have the error that currently exists today in science.

Chris i know i am correct about finding the maths error because its written on the front page of the old book, God's book. In effect, God has told me that i am correct about the maths error. The maths error confirms the old book, and the old book confirms the maths error. They are directly connected!

Or if i say it correctly, God's name does NOT contain the error that currently exists today in science. God got it right, and human scientists got it wrong!

John.
____________

In my mind, there were never been any big bang, no black holes nor white holes, no dark matter but maybe some kind of black energy which should more be called invisible energy :P
____________