Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimize your GPU. Find the value the easy way.
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 13 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
S@NL - eFMer - efmer.com/boinc Send message Joined: 7 Jun 99 Posts: 512 Credit: 148,746,305 RAC: 0 |
V 1.1 will have a lot more diagnostics. The files are copied C:\Users\username\AppData\Roaming\eFMer\SetiPerformance\slotx In that location the exe is started. Is it there? (You have to press start first to copy the files.) TThrottle Control your temperatures. BoincTasks The best way to view BOINC. Anza Borrego Desert hiking. |
S@NL - eFMer - efmer.com/boinc Send message Joined: 7 Jun 99 Posts: 512 Credit: 148,746,305 RAC: 0 |
You can take a look in: C:\Users\username\AppData\Roaming\eFMer\SetiPerformance The applications are in slotx, but are removed after you press cancel. In the slot, check the application log for an error TThrottle Control your temperatures. BoincTasks The best way to view BOINC. Anza Borrego Desert hiking. |
juan BFP Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 9786 Credit: 572,710,851 RAC: 3,799 |
Ok, i´m on XP so the path is little diferent but i foud. WHen runs this is the oputput: Starting automatic test: (lunatics_x41z_win32_cuda42.exe) 26 August 2012 - 09:17:24 Start, devices: 1, device count: 1 26 August 2012 - 09:19:06 Runtime: Device: 0, count: 0, 101 seconds 26 August 2012 - 09:19:06 Device: 0, finished Ready --------------------------------------------------------------------- Results: Device: 0, device count: 1, average time / count: 101, average time on device: 101 Seconds (1 Minutes, 41 Seconds) Next --------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 August 2012 - 09:19:06 Start, devices: 1, device count: 2 26 August 2012 - 09:22:31 Runtime: Device: 0, count: 1, 202 seconds 26 August 2012 - 09:22:31 Runtime: Device: 0, count: 0, 202 seconds 26 August 2012 - 09:22:31 Device: 0, finished 26 August 2012 - 09:22:31 Device: 0, finished Ready --------------------------------------------------------------------- Results: Device: 0, device count: 2, average time / count: 202, average time on device: 101 Seconds (1 Minutes, 41 Seconds) The best average time found: 101 Seconds (1 Minutes, 41 Seconds), with count: 1.00 (1) Then on slot 0 an't open init data file - running in standalone mode Can't open init data file - running in standalone mode setiathome_CUDA: Found 2 CUDA device(s): Device 1: GeForce GTX 590, 1535 MiB, regsPerBlock 32768 computeCap 2.0, multiProcs 16 pciBusID = 3, pciSlotID = 0 clockRate = 1260 MHz Device 2: GeForce GTX 590, 1535 MiB, regsPerBlock 32768 computeCap 2.0, multiProcs 16 pciBusID = 4, pciSlotID = 0 clockRate = 1260 MHz In cudaAcc_initializeDevice(): Boinc passed DevPref 1 setiathome_CUDA: CUDA Device 1 specified, checking... Device 1: GeForce GTX 590 is okay SETI@home using CUDA accelerated device GeForce GTX 590 pulsefind: blocks per SM 4 (Fermi or newer default) pulsefind: periods per launch 100 (default) Priority of process set to BELOW_NORMAL (default) successfully Priority of worker thread set successfully setiathome enhanced x41z, Cuda 4.20 Legacy setiathome_enhanced V6 mode. Work Unit Info: ............... WU true angle range is : 0.775000 VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_cx_DataArray, 1048576x 8bytes = 8388608bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 8388608bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_cx_ChirpDataArray, 1179648x 8bytes = 9437184bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 17825792bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_flag, 1x 8bytes = 8bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 17825800bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_WorkData, 1179648x 8bytes = 9437184bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 27262984bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_PowerSpectrum, 1048576x 4bytes = 4194304bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 31457288bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_t_PowerSpectrum, 1048584x 4bytes = 1048608bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 32505896bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_GaussFitResults, 1048576x 16bytes = 16777216bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 49283112bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_PoT, 1572864x 4bytes = 6291456bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 55574568bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_PoTPrefixSum, 1572864x 4bytes = 6291456bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 61866024bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_NormMaxPower, 16384x 4bytes = 65536bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 61931560bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_flagged, 1048576x 4bytes = 4194304bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 66125864bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_outputposition, 1048576x 4bytes = 4194304bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 70320168bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_PowerSpectrumSumMax, 262144x 12bytes = 3145728bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 73465896bytes VRAM: cudaMallocArray( &dev_gauss_dof_lcgf_cache, 1x 8192bytes = 8192bytes, offs256=184, rtotal= 73474088bytes VRAM: cudaMallocArray( &dev_null_dof_lcgf_cache, 1x 8192bytes = 8192bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 73482280bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_find_pulse_flag, 1x 8bytes = 8bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 73482288bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_t_funct_cache, 1966081x 4bytes = 7864324bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 81346612bytes Thread call stack limit is: 1k cudaAcc_free() called... cudaAcc_free() running... cudaAcc_free() PulseFind freed... cudaAcc_free() Gaussfit freed... cudaAcc_free() AutoCorrelation freed... cudaAcc_free() DONE. Flopcounter: 12287736759182.770000 Spike count: 13 Pulse count: 1 Triplet count: 0 Gaussian count: 0 Worker preemptively acknowledging a normal exit.-> called boinc_finish boinc_exit(): requesting safe worker shutdown -> boinc_exit(): received safe worker shutdown acknowledge -> on slot1 Can't open init data file - running in standalone mode Can't open init data file - running in standalone mode Can't open init data file - running in standalone mode setiathome_CUDA: Found 2 CUDA device(s): Device 1: GeForce GTX 590, 1535 MiB, regsPerBlock 32768 computeCap 2.0, multiProcs 16 pciBusID = 3, pciSlotID = 0 clockRate = 1260 MHz Device 2: GeForce GTX 590, 1535 MiB, regsPerBlock 32768 computeCap 2.0, multiProcs 16 pciBusID = 4, pciSlotID = 0 clockRate = 1260 MHz In cudaAcc_initializeDevice(): Boinc passed DevPref 1 setiathome_CUDA: CUDA Device 1 specified, checking... Device 1: GeForce GTX 590 is okay SETI@home using CUDA accelerated device GeForce GTX 590 pulsefind: blocks per SM 4 (Fermi or newer default) pulsefind: periods per launch 100 (default) Priority of process set to BELOW_NORMAL (default) successfully Priority of worker thread set successfully setiathome enhanced x41z, Cuda 4.20 Legacy setiathome_enhanced V6 mode. Work Unit Info: ............... WU true angle range is : 0.775000 VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_cx_DataArray, 1048576x 8bytes = 8388608bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 8388608bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_cx_ChirpDataArray, 1179648x 8bytes = 9437184bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 17825792bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_flag, 1x 8bytes = 8bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 17825800bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_WorkData, 1179648x 8bytes = 9437184bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 27262984bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_PowerSpectrum, 1048576x 4bytes = 4194304bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 31457288bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_t_PowerSpectrum, 1048584x 4bytes = 1048608bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 32505896bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_GaussFitResults, 1048576x 16bytes = 16777216bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 49283112bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_PoT, 1572864x 4bytes = 6291456bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 55574568bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_PoTPrefixSum, 1572864x 4bytes = 6291456bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 61866024bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_NormMaxPower, 16384x 4bytes = 65536bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 61931560bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_flagged, 1048576x 4bytes = 4194304bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 66125864bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_outputposition, 1048576x 4bytes = 4194304bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 70320168bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_PowerSpectrumSumMax, 262144x 12bytes = 3145728bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 73465896bytes VRAM: cudaMallocArray( &dev_gauss_dof_lcgf_cache, 1x 8192bytes = 8192bytes, offs256=208, rtotal= 73474088bytes VRAM: cudaMallocArray( &dev_null_dof_lcgf_cache, 1x 8192bytes = 8192bytes, offs256=56, rtotal= 73482280bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_find_pulse_flag, 1x 8bytes = 8bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 73482288bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_t_funct_cache, 1966081x 4bytes = 7864324bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 81346612bytes Thread call stack limit is: 1k cudaAcc_free() called... cudaAcc_free() running... cudaAcc_free() PulseFind freed... cudaAcc_free() Gaussfit freed... cudaAcc_free() AutoCorrelation freed... cudaAcc_free() DONE. Flopcounter: 12287736759182.770000 Spike count: 13 Pulse count: 1 Triplet count: 0 Gaussian count: 0 Worker preemptively acknowledging a normal exit.-> called boinc_finish boinc_exit(): requesting safe worker shutdown -> boinc_exit(): received safe worker shutdown acknowledge -> setiathome_CUDA: Found 2 CUDA device(s): Device 1: GeForce GTX 590, 1535 MiB, regsPerBlock 32768 computeCap 2.0, multiProcs 16 pciBusID = 3, pciSlotID = 0 clockRate = 1260 MHz Device 2: GeForce GTX 590, 1535 MiB, regsPerBlock 32768 computeCap 2.0, multiProcs 16 pciBusID = 4, pciSlotID = 0 clockRate = 1260 MHz In cudaAcc_initializeDevice(): Boinc passed DevPref 1 setiathome_CUDA: CUDA Device 1 specified, checking... Device 1: GeForce GTX 590 is okay SETI@home using CUDA accelerated device GeForce GTX 590 pulsefind: blocks per SM 4 (Fermi or newer default) pulsefind: periods per launch 100 (default) Priority of process set to BELOW_NORMAL (default) successfully Priority of worker thread set successfully setiathome enhanced x41z, Cuda 4.20 Legacy setiathome_enhanced V6 mode. Work Unit Info: ............... WU true angle range is : 0.775000 VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_cx_DataArray, 1048576x 8bytes = 8388608bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 8388608bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_cx_ChirpDataArray, 1179648x 8bytes = 9437184bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 17825792bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_flag, 1x 8bytes = 8bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 17825800bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_WorkData, 1179648x 8bytes = 9437184bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 27262984bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_PowerSpectrum, 1048576x 4bytes = 4194304bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 31457288bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_t_PowerSpectrum, 1048584x 4bytes = 1048608bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 32505896bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_GaussFitResults, 1048576x 16bytes = 16777216bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 49283112bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_PoT, 1572864x 4bytes = 6291456bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 55574568bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_PoTPrefixSum, 1572864x 4bytes = 6291456bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 61866024bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_NormMaxPower, 16384x 4bytes = 65536bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 61931560bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_flagged, 1048576x 4bytes = 4194304bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 66125864bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_outputposition, 1048576x 4bytes = 4194304bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 70320168bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_PowerSpectrumSumMax, 262144x 12bytes = 3145728bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 73465896bytes VRAM: cudaMallocArray( &dev_gauss_dof_lcgf_cache, 1x 8192bytes = 8192bytes, offs256=208, rtotal= 73474088bytes VRAM: cudaMallocArray( &dev_null_dof_lcgf_cache, 1x 8192bytes = 8192bytes, offs256=56, rtotal= 73482280bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_find_pulse_flag, 1x 8bytes = 8bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 73482288bytes VRAM: cudaMalloc((void**) &dev_t_funct_cache, 1966081x 4bytes = 7864324bytes, offs256=0, rtotal= 81346612bytes Thread call stack limit is: 1k cudaAcc_free() called... cudaAcc_free() running... cudaAcc_free() PulseFind freed... cudaAcc_free() Gaussfit freed... cudaAcc_free() AutoCorrelation freed... cudaAcc_free() DONE. Flopcounter: 12287736759182.770000 Spike count: 13 Pulse count: 1 Triplet count: 0 Gaussian count: 0 Worker preemptively acknowledging a normal exit.-> called boinc_finish boinc_exit(): requesting safe worker shutdown -> boinc_exit(): received safe worker shutdown acknowledge -> no work was done for the 2 GPU or in the others slots. maybe?: Can't open init data file - running in standalone mode Any clue? Sorry to take your time. |
S@NL - eFMer - efmer.com/boinc Send message Joined: 7 Jun 99 Posts: 512 Credit: 148,746,305 RAC: 0 |
Set devices to 2 and try again. It's one board but with 2 devices. For comparison I like to see the automatic test log. I have a 590 on a Win 7 system. TThrottle Control your temperatures. BoincTasks The best way to view BOINC. Anza Borrego Desert hiking. |
Lint trap Send message Joined: 30 May 03 Posts: 871 Credit: 28,092,319 RAC: 0 |
GTX 460 o/c'd, 1gb, 256-bit. XPP-sp3 32-bit, NV driver 301.42, system idle. Starting test: (lunatics_x41g_win32_cuda32_perf.exe) Device: 0, device count: 1, average time / count: 162, average time on device: 162 Seconds (2 Minutes, 42 Seconds) Device: 0, device count: 2, average time / count: 317, average time on device: 158 Seconds (2 Minutes, 38 Seconds) Device: 0, device count: 3, average time / count: 474, average time on device: 158 Seconds (2 Minutes, 38 Seconds) Device: 0, device count: 4, average time / count: 635, average time on device: 158 Seconds (2 Minutes, 38 Seconds) I was surprised to see the 460/this system 'appears' to have more headroom available after posting identical averages for 2, 3, and 4 counts... Lt |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
Just gotta say....... Fred, you are da man. Thank you for all your efforts indeed. I use your priority tool on all my rigs. I used your rescheduler all the time when it was still appropriate to do so. Now, not so much. I shall have to get my head around this new tool. Thank you again for all your tuning efforts for all on this project, Fred. "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
juan BFP Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 9786 Credit: 572,710,851 RAC: 3,799 |
Hi this is what you need? Starting automatic test: (lunatics_x41z_win32_cuda42.exe) 26 August 2012 - 13:28:26 Start, devices: 2, device count: 1 26 August 2012 - 13:30:23 Runtime: Device: 0, count: 0, 114 seconds 26 August 2012 - 13:30:23 Device: 0, finished 26 August 2012 - 13:30:23 Runtime: Device: 1, count: 0, 114 seconds 26 August 2012 - 13:30:23 Device: 1, finished Ready --------------------------------------------------------------------- Results: Device: 0, device count: 1, average time / count: 114, average time on device: 114 Seconds (1 Minutes, 54 Seconds) Device: 1, device count: 1, average time / count: 114, average time on device: 114 Seconds (1 Minutes, 54 Seconds) Next --------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 August 2012 - 13:30:25 Start, devices: 2, device count: 2 26 August 2012 - 13:33:34 Runtime: Device: 1, count: 1, 184 seconds 26 August 2012 - 13:33:34 Device: 1, finished 26 August 2012 - 13:33:48 Runtime: Device: 1, count: 0, 198 seconds 26 August 2012 - 13:33:48 Device: 1, finished 26 August 2012 - 13:34:02 Runtime: Device: 0, count: 0, 212 seconds 26 August 2012 - 13:34:02 Device: 0, finished 26 August 2012 - 13:34:02 Runtime: Device: 0, count: 1, 212 seconds 26 August 2012 - 13:34:02 Device: 0, finished Ready --------------------------------------------------------------------- Results: Device: 0, device count: 2, average time / count: 212, average time on device: 106 Seconds (1 Minutes, 46 Seconds) Device: 1, device count: 2, average time / count: 191, average time on device: 95 Seconds (1 Minutes, 35 Seconds) Next --------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 August 2012 - 13:34:03 Start, devices: 2, device count: 3 26 August 2012 - 13:34:49 Runtime: Device: 1, count: 2, 38 seconds 26 August 2012 - 13:34:49 ERROR: Device: 1, finished 26 August 2012 - 13:37:57 Runtime: Device: 1, count: 1, 226 seconds 26 August 2012 - 13:37:57 Device: 1, finished 26 August 2012 - 13:37:57 Runtime: Device: 1, count: 0, 226 seconds 26 August 2012 - 13:37:57 Device: 1, finished 26 August 2012 - 13:38:49 Runtime: Device: 0, count: 0, 278 seconds 26 August 2012 - 13:38:49 Device: 0, finished 26 August 2012 - 13:39:17 Runtime: Device: 0, count: 2, 306 seconds 26 August 2012 - 13:39:17 Device: 0, finished 26 August 2012 - 13:39:17 Runtime: Device: 0, count: 1, 306 seconds 26 August 2012 - 13:39:17 Device: 0, finished Ready --------------------------------------------------------------------- Results: Device: 0, device count: 3, average time / count: 296, average time on device: 98 Seconds (1 Minutes, 38 Seconds) Device: 1, device count: 3, average time / count: 163, average time on device: 54 Seconds (0 Minutes, 54 Seconds) Next --------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 August 2012 - 13:39:19 Start, devices: 2, device count: 4 |
S@NL - eFMer - efmer.com/boinc Send message Joined: 7 Jun 99 Posts: 512 Credit: 148,746,305 RAC: 0 |
Yep, just go the 41z running on a 590 as wel, I see a 4% increase. Your last reading is highly suspicious, I expect the card to error out. In 1.1 almost ready, I added an error check on the result. You could check the count 3 and if you see the same difference investigate the stderr.txt to see if there is an overflow error. TThrottle Control your temperatures. BoincTasks The best way to view BOINC. Anza Borrego Desert hiking. |
S@NL - eFMer - efmer.com/boinc Send message Joined: 7 Jun 99 Posts: 512 Credit: 148,746,305 RAC: 0 |
Under some conditions, the program may generate a virus scanner warning. I did sign the programs, if I didn't sign it, the program was shut down by my scanner almost at once. TThrottle Control your temperatures. BoincTasks The best way to view BOINC. Anza Borrego Desert hiking. |
juan BFP Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 9786 Credit: 572,710,851 RAC: 3,799 |
The only thing is because the problem only apears on this host, in all the others i tests runs ok (all runs XP32 but with different GPUs combinations). Just report to you as a contribution in the development, even if is faster i can´t run more than 2WU at a time per GPU because the memory limitation on XP32. |
spitfire_mk_2 Send message Joined: 14 Apr 00 Posts: 563 Credit: 27,306,885 RAC: 0 |
Well, I can't get it to work. I have one NVIDIA GT 520 installed. When I run the program with the default "Devices 1", "Count 0.50", I get this: My guess is that your card has enough video RAM to run only one task. |
BMH Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 419 Credit: 166,294,083 RAC: 125 |
Running the tool alongside GPU-Z gives a nice visual indication of which is best. Although running three tasks on my 460 test system showed slightly more solid GPU usage according to GPU-Z, 2 tasks (as expected) was the optimum. Brian. |
Horacio Send message Joined: 14 Jan 00 Posts: 536 Credit: 75,967,266 RAC: 0 |
First, Thanks Fred, another really good tool! Now, If I set the count to 0.20 for a manual test it doesnt start... It shows a message saying that only valus of 1, 0.5, 0.33 and 0.25 are valid... May be instead of this message you could give a warning saying that it could fail with more than 4 instances per card giving the option to do it anyway or not on user choice... Another suggestion is to anchor the controls so they get resized/relocated when the users resizes the main window... Its just cosmetics anyway... (And I know that while this it's easy on .NET, it may be a lot of work if you are using the native SDK and C++) |
S@NL - eFMer - efmer.com/boinc Send message Joined: 7 Jun 99 Posts: 512 Credit: 148,746,305 RAC: 0 |
The list so far, I hope there is no typo. As you can see the 590 still leads. But with Jason working on the 6xx, this will change soon. x41g 460 158 Sec / Wu Oc 560 150 Sec / Wu 295 130 Sec / Wu 670 129 Sec / Wu 680 107 Sec / Wu 480 100 Sec / Wu 690 58 Sec / Wu 590 53 Sec / Wu x41z 295 Not running stable 480 89 Sec / Wu 680 75 Sec / Wu cuda 5 590 53 Sec / Wu 690 44 Sec / Wu TThrottle Control your temperatures. BoincTasks The best way to view BOINC. Anza Borrego Desert hiking. |
juan BFP Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 9786 Credit: 572,710,851 RAC: 3,799 |
I´m not shure but i think i see in some forum some special build for the 295 with x41z, maybe you could ask Jason about that. About the table, ok i could see lower is better, but what those number realy means? Just curiosity. |
S@NL - eFMer - efmer.com/boinc Send message Joined: 7 Jun 99 Posts: 512 Credit: 148,746,305 RAC: 0 |
I´m not shure but i think i see in some forum some special build for the 295 with x41z, maybe you could ask Jason about that. There is, a cuda 3.2 version, but it errors out -9 overflow on one of them. TThrottle Control your temperatures. BoincTasks The best way to view BOINC. Anza Borrego Desert hiking. |
S@NL - eFMer - efmer.com/boinc Send message Joined: 7 Jun 99 Posts: 512 Credit: 148,746,305 RAC: 0 |
I see, the resize is still on. Will move the buttons to the top, that makes the text resizable. You could move the buttons around as well, but very easy for something to mess things up. And on 125% and 150% this cause other problems. TThrottle Control your temperatures. BoincTasks The best way to view BOINC. Anza Borrego Desert hiking. |
Russ Sheldon Send message Joined: 18 Jan 01 Posts: 382 Credit: 530,470,939 RAC: 0 |
Thanks Fred! Runs great with _g. Won't run with _z. Program failed to start on slot: 0 Proud member of the half bill club! |
Horacio Send message Joined: 14 Jan 00 Posts: 536 Credit: 75,967,266 RAC: 0 |
This are my results: Both tests on Win 7 Pro 32b. I7-3770 (3.5Ghz constant with turbo boosted) on z68 chipset. BOINC full stopped. Driver 301.42 GTX680 Default Clock (core at 1111Mhz -full boost-, Mem at 3004Mhz) Pcie3.016x Device: 0, device count: 1, average time / count: 170, average time on device: 170 Seconds (2 Minutes, 50 Seconds) Device: 0, device count: 2, average time / count: 244, average time on device: 122 Seconds (2 Minutes, 2 Seconds) Device: 0, device count: 3, average time / count: 355, average time on device: 118 Seconds (1 Minutes, 58 Seconds) Device: 0, device count: 4, average time / count: 477, average time on device: 119 Seconds (1 Minutes, 59 Seconds) The best average time found: 118 Seconds (1 Minutes, 58 Seconds), with count: 0.33 (3) GTX680 OC'ed (core at 1215Mhz -full boost-, Mem at 3105Mhz) Pcie3.016x Device: 0, device count: 1, average time / count: 163, average time on device: 163 Seconds (2 Minutes, 43 Seconds) Device: 0, device count: 2, average time / count: 235, average time on device: 117 Seconds (1 Minutes, 57 Seconds) Device: 0, device count: 3, average time / count: 340, average time on device: 113 Seconds (1 Minutes, 53 Seconds) Device: 0, device count: 4, average time / count: 456, average time on device: 114 Seconds (1 Minutes, 54 Seconds) The best average time found: 113 Seconds (1 Minutes, 53 Seconds), with count: 0.33 (3) Weird thing... my gtx680 seems to be slower than others, even OC'ed... And nothing else running on the host other than MSI afterburner and Process Laso to set the apps at normal priority... |
S@NL - eFMer - efmer.com/boinc Send message Joined: 7 Jun 99 Posts: 512 Credit: 148,746,305 RAC: 0 |
Yep seems to be on the low side. NVIDIA 3d setting->power management->max performance. What I've seen so far is that the 6xx series is slower than the 4xx and 5xx series. Probably something to do with optimizing. TThrottle Control your temperatures. BoincTasks The best way to view BOINC. Anza Borrego Desert hiking. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.