Help.... I messed something up.

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Help.... I messed something up.

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 9 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile arkaynProject Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4097
Credit: 51,576,090
RAC: 1,593
United States
Message 1258975 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 17:07:07 UTC - in response to Message 1258973.

I'm not sure I understand what the fuss is all about. This has been a feature for a while now and I've had mine set to only display the last 35 posts for a few years.

Has something other than that been changed or are people just noticing it now?


If you have it set to display the newest posts last, it always loads the top of thread and then you have to scroll down and hit load the next xxx posts several times for longer threads.


ID: 1258975 · Report as offensive
Horacio

Send message
Joined: 14 Jan 00
Posts: 536
Credit: 75,967,266
RAC: 0
Argentina
Message 1258981 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 17:15:26 UTC - in response to Message 1258973.

I'm not sure I understand what the fuss is all about. This has been a feature for a while now and I've had mine set to only display the last 35 posts for a few years.

Has something other than that been changed or are people just noticing it now?


The option to show only some of the last posts is not there anymore, now the threads are paged. That's what changed.

ID: 1258981 · Report as offensive
OzzFan
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15112
Credit: 45,356,064
RAC: 44,099
United States
Message 1258982 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 17:16:17 UTC - in response to Message 1258975.

I'm not sure I understand what the fuss is all about. This has been a feature for a while now and I've had mine set to only display the last 35 posts for a few years.

Has something other than that been changed or are people just noticing it now?


If you have it set to display the newest posts last, it always loads the top of thread and then you have to scroll down and hit load the next xxx posts several times for longer threads.


I do have it set to show newest posts last, and it just worked now when I read your new post to me.


I have, however, noticed a bug in two specific threads (one thread in politics and one in SETI non-science) where a post keeps getting marked as having a new post, but when I click on it, no new posts have been added.

ID: 1258982 · Report as offensive
Profile Link
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 03
Posts: 805
Credit: 1,678,562
RAC: 44
Germany
Message 1258984 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 17:17:28 UTC
Last modified: 11 Jul 2012, 17:19:12 UTC

OK, the whole thing is pretty much unusable on longer threads in combination with some "normal" amout of posts per page (20-40). If you post in such thread, you be redirected to the first page and can click you thru to your post. If that "improvement" was for dial-up users, I'm pretty sure they are the ones, who are pissed off the most now. Let's hope they fix it fast.


.

ID: 1258984 · Report as offensive
OzzFan
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15112
Credit: 45,356,064
RAC: 44,099
United States
Message 1258986 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 17:20:28 UTC - in response to Message 1258981.
Last modified: 11 Jul 2012, 17:21:26 UTC

I'm not sure I understand what the fuss is all about. This has been a feature for a while now and I've had mine set to only display the last 35 posts for a few years.

Has something other than that been changed or are people just noticing it now?


The option to show only some of the last posts is not there anymore, now the threads are paged. That's what changed.


Ah, yes, I see what you mean now.

ID: 1258986 · Report as offensive
Profile arkaynProject Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4097
Credit: 51,576,090
RAC: 1,593
United States
Message 1258993 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 17:28:50 UTC - in response to Message 1258982.

I'm not sure I understand what the fuss is all about. This has been a feature for a while now and I've had mine set to only display the last 35 posts for a few years.

Has something other than that been changed or are people just noticing it now?


If you have it set to display the newest posts last, it always loads the top of thread and then you have to scroll down and hit load the next xxx posts several times for longer threads.


I do have it set to show newest posts last, and it just worked now when I read your new post to me.


I have, however, noticed a bug in two specific threads (one thread in politics and one in SETI non-science) where a post keeps getting marked as having a new post, but when I click on it, no new posts have been added.


Try loading one of the older game threads that still says it has unread messages and it should take you to the first posts and you will have to hit next several times.


ID: 1258993 · Report as offensive
OzzFan
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15112
Credit: 45,356,064
RAC: 44,099
United States
Message 1259009 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 17:39:48 UTC - in response to Message 1258993.

I'm not sure I understand what the fuss is all about. This has been a feature for a while now and I've had mine set to only display the last 35 posts for a few years.

Has something other than that been changed or are people just noticing it now?


If you have it set to display the newest posts last, it always loads the top of thread and then you have to scroll down and hit load the next xxx posts several times for longer threads.


I do have it set to show newest posts last, and it just worked now when I read your new post to me.


I have, however, noticed a bug in two specific threads (one thread in politics and one in SETI non-science) where a post keeps getting marked as having a new post, but when I click on it, no new posts have been added.


Try loading one of the older game threads that still says it has unread messages and it should take you to the first posts and you will have to hit next several times.


Ah, I see now. The number I had listed for "show only the last X posts" is now the number of posts per page.

ID: 1259009 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 33251
Credit: 9,005,142
RAC: 8,765
Belgium
Message 1259021 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 17:54:16 UTC - in response to Message 1258843.

Mine is set at 75?


Mine too I think.

rOZZ
MUSIC

ID: 1259021 · Report as offensive
Tutankhamon "Communist"
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 08
Posts: 6082
Credit: 37,657,579
RAC: 16,688
Sweden
Message 1259025 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 18:00:15 UTC

Oh my, oh my, that was not an improvement. Until it's changed back to the old style, I've set my community prefs to "1000 Display this many messages per page".

Problem gone, until there is a thread with more than 1000 posts.


This is a test of the Emergency Moron System. Had there been a real moron in the room, there would've been a small mushroom cloud in the place where the idiot had been standing.

ID: 1259025 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6089
Credit: 155,122,937
RAC: 49,093
United States
Message 1259033 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 18:17:01 UTC - in response to Message 1258984.

OK, the whole thing is pretty much unusable on longer threads in combination with some "normal" amout of posts per page (20-40). If you post in such thread, you be redirected to the first page and can click you thru to your post. If that "improvement" was for dial-up users, I'm pretty sure they are the ones, who are pissed off the most now. Let's hope they fix it fast.

I wish they didn't have the "instead of rolling back to the last thing that worked, let's spend the next 2 years trying to make the change work" mentality.
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours

Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today!

ID: 1259033 · Report as offensive
Tutankhamon "Communist"
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 08
Posts: 6082
Credit: 37,657,579
RAC: 16,688
Sweden
Message 1259045 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 18:33:22 UTC - in response to Message 1259033.

OK, the whole thing is pretty much unusable on longer threads in combination with some "normal" amout of posts per page (20-40). If you post in such thread, you be redirected to the first page and can click you thru to your post. If that "improvement" was for dial-up users, I'm pretty sure they are the ones, who are pissed off the most now. Let's hope they fix it fast.

I wish they didn't have the "instead of rolling back to the last thing that worked, let's spend the next 2 years trying to make the change work" mentality.


I think the Captain of this ship is the type that can't admit it, when he's done something wrong.
This is a test of the Emergency Moron System. Had there been a real moron in the room, there would've been a small mushroom cloud in the place where the idiot had been standing.

ID: 1259045 · Report as offensive
OzzFan
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15112
Credit: 45,356,064
RAC: 44,099
United States
Message 1259050 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 18:40:14 UTC - in response to Message 1259045.

OK, the whole thing is pretty much unusable on longer threads in combination with some "normal" amout of posts per page (20-40). If you post in such thread, you be redirected to the first page and can click you thru to your post. If that "improvement" was for dial-up users, I'm pretty sure they are the ones, who are pissed off the most now. Let's hope they fix it fast.

I wish they didn't have the "instead of rolling back to the last thing that worked, let's spend the next 2 years trying to make the change work" mentality.


I think the Captain of this ship is the type that can't admit it, when he's done something wrong.


I think that DA was tying to be accommodating to a user request. The way the preference was implemented previously, if you hadn't visited the forums in a week and a particular post had 100 new entries, even if you had the "display only X" set to 35, you would still have to wait for the entire page to load because it would still show all 100 new posts.

With this change, people on slow mobile connections can at least change the number to something meaningful and only have to load X many posts per page without having to wait forever.

With the entire world going increasingly mobile (phones, tablets, netbooks), this change makes sense.

ID: 1259050 · Report as offensive
Profile James SotherdenProject Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 May 99
Posts: 10133
Credit: 65,719,549
RAC: 36,224
United States
Message 1259057 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 18:50:48 UTC

Then It should be an option. Not defacto.


[/quote]

Old James

ID: 1259057 · Report as offensive
Profile Dimly Lit Lightbulb 😀Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 08
Posts: 14363
Credit: 2,923,787
RAC: 4,408
United Kingdom
Message 1259064 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 19:14:05 UTC
Last modified: 11 Jul 2012, 19:27:45 UTC

I was wondering why I couldn't seem to see the new posts in a thread. *clicks next* hehehe :)

[EDIT]OK, not funny, it keeps going back to the first page[/EDIT]


ID: 1259064 · Report as offensive
Sirius B
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 14920
Credit: 2,128,047
RAC: 658
Ireland
Message 1259066 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 19:19:28 UTC - in response to Message 1259025.

Oh my, oh my, that was not an improvement. Until it's changed back to the old style, I've set my community prefs to "1000 Display this many messages per page".

Problem gone, until there is a thread with more than 1000 posts.


you are a true gent...just done that & that "pesky" next 75 posts button has disappeared.... :)

ID: 1259066 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6089
Credit: 155,122,937
RAC: 49,093
United States
Message 1259070 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 19:26:22 UTC - in response to Message 1259066.

Oh my, oh my, that was not an improvement. Until it's changed back to the old style, I've set my community prefs to "1000 Display this many messages per page".

Problem gone, until there is a thread with more than 1000 posts.


you are a true gent...just done that & that "pesky" next 75 posts button has disappeared.... :)

That does seem to be the work around unless they decide to implement the rest of the features that a standard paged message board uses.
for reference
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours

Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today!

ID: 1259070 · Report as offensive
Sirius B
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 14920
Credit: 2,128,047
RAC: 658
Ireland
Message 1259072 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 19:29:30 UTC - in response to Message 1259070.

Oh my, oh my, that was not an improvement. Until it's changed back to the old style, I've set my community prefs to "1000 Display this many messages per page".

Problem gone, until there is a thread with more than 1000 posts.


you are a true gent...just done that & that "pesky" next 75 posts button has disappeared.... :)

That does seem to be the work around unless they decide to implement the rest of the features that a standard paged message board uses.
for reference



Killjoy...... :)

ID: 1259072 · Report as offensive
Sirius B
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 14920
Credit: 2,128,047
RAC: 658
Ireland
Message 1259082 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 19:38:37 UTC - in response to Message 1259025.

snip

Problem gone, until there is a thread with more than 1000 posts.


Not a problem if all OP's have their threads locked between 350 & 500 posts & continue with a second thread etc.

ID: 1259082 · Report as offensive
JohnDKCrowdfunding Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 May 00
Posts: 944
Credit: 87,847,918
RAC: 47,675
Denmark
Message 1259086 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 19:42:41 UTC - in response to Message 1259025.

Oh my, oh my, that was not an improvement. Until it's changed back to the old style, I've set my community prefs to "1000 Display this many messages per page".

Problem gone, until there is a thread with more than 1000 posts.

Might do the same. But will that not mean more work for the servers, loading all posts every time one checks latest posts?

ID: 1259086 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6089
Credit: 155,122,937
RAC: 49,093
United States
Message 1259088 - Posted: 11 Jul 2012, 19:43:49 UTC - in response to Message 1259082.
Last modified: 11 Jul 2012, 19:52:29 UTC

snip

Problem gone, until there is a thread with more than 1000 posts.


Not a problem if all OP's have their threads locked between 350 & 500 posts & continue with a second thread etc.

I actually set mine to 10000. I tried to find a thread with more than 1000 posts to test this, but the max I found was in the 900 range.
EDIT: The Topic page selections just disappear?
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours

Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today!

ID: 1259088 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 9 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Help.... I messed something up.


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.