Help.... I messed something up.


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Help.... I messed something up.

Previous · 1 . . . 6 · 7 · 8 · 9
Author Message
John McLeod VII
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 99
Posts: 24806
Credit: 585,753
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1264814 - Posted: 27 Jul 2012, 11:30:43 UTC

If you post to the thread, you see N posts where N is the number you selected for page size.

If you quote or reply to a post, you see just the single post you are replying to.
____________


BOINC WIKI

Profile UliProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 6 Feb 00
Posts: 10537
Credit: 5,520,866
RAC: 11
Germany
Message 1264830 - Posted: 27 Jul 2012, 12:28:52 UTC - in response to Message 1264814.

Nope John. I think it is settings.
Regardless
Out of our hands.
____________
Pluto will always be a planet to me.

Seti Ambassador

Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 5332
Credit: 144,211,362
RAC: 146,383
United States
Message 1264833 - Posted: 27 Jul 2012, 12:50:12 UTC - in response to Message 1264830.

Nope John. I think it is settings.
Regardless
Out of our hands.

I just get the one message I am replying or quoting when I press those buttons. If it is a setting I don't have it. :(

____________
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours

Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today!

Profile Gary Charpentier
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 14839
Credit: 11,693,776
RAC: 19,297
United States
Message 1264853 - Posted: 27 Jul 2012, 13:59:53 UTC - in response to Message 1264830.

Nope John. I think it is settings.
Regardless
Out of our hands.

Is it because you have the moderator tag? Try with a regular user.

____________

Profile Donald L. JohnsonProject donor
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 02
Posts: 7383
Credit: 1,666,355
RAC: 4,779
United States
Message 1264899 - Posted: 27 Jul 2012, 16:34:49 UTC - in response to Message 1264853.

Nope John. I think it is settings.
Regardless
Out of our hands.

Is it because you have the moderator tag? Try with a regular user.

I am seeing the same things as the others.
I suspect Gary is right, the Moderator flag gives you a different set of options.
____________
Donald
Infernal Optimist / Submariner, retired

Profile JulieProject donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 30867
Credit: 5,036,498
RAC: 3,060
Belgium
Message 1264934 - Posted: 27 Jul 2012, 17:35:52 UTC - in response to Message 1264853.

Nope John. I think it is settings.
Regardless
Out of our hands.

Is it because you have the moderator tag? Try with a regular user.


Same tag here and still a single post. I didn't know there were settings for it though.
____________


rOZZ

Big Bang Corollary.

musicplayer
Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 1570
Credit: 754,172
RAC: 4
Message 1265008 - Posted: 27 Jul 2012, 20:42:34 UTC
Last modified: 27 Jul 2012, 20:56:06 UTC

There is another strange thing visible straight before your eyes.

If you look at one the previous posts, I says Message XXXXX - - Posted: 27 Jul 2012 | XX:XX:XX UTC (- in response to Message YYYYY).

And put your mouse about the document icon, which could show up in a yellowish color. It says "you haven't read this message yet".

Of course, I can click on the web-link for the message and read it individually. But what is the point doing such a thing? The message has been posted in the thread you are visiting and therefore you are supposed to be reading the message when visiting the thread.

My guess is this is something that was originally inherited from before the time of the web, when these message boards were kind of bulletin boards, possibly readable or accessible by some other type of newsreader software.

And now after posting this message, this document icon is gone, it is not visible in the thread anymore.

Profile Zapped SparkyProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 08
Posts: 13372
Credit: 1,548,024
RAC: 1,528
United Kingdom
Message 1265011 - Posted: 27 Jul 2012, 21:07:16 UTC

If I click "reply" or "quote" all I see is the single post. If I click "post to thread" I see all of them.
____________
In an alternate universe, it was a ZX81 that asked for clothes, boots and motorcycle.

Client error 418: I'm a teapot

Tropical Goldfish Fish 15: Squeaky bras 'R us

Illusions of normality sufferer

Profile Gary Charpentier
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 14839
Credit: 11,693,776
RAC: 19,297
United States
Message 1265027 - Posted: 27 Jul 2012, 21:56:49 UTC - in response to Message 1265008.

There is another strange thing visible straight before your eyes.

If you look at one the previous posts, I says Message XXXXX - - Posted: 27 Jul 2012 | XX:XX:XX UTC (- in response to Message YYYYY).

And put your mouse about the document icon, which could show up in a yellowish color. It says "you haven't read this message yet".

Of course, I can click on the web-link for the message and read it individually. But what is the point doing such a thing? The message has been posted in the thread you are visiting and therefore you are supposed to be reading the message when visiting the thread.

My guess is this is something that was originally inherited from before the time of the web, when these message boards were kind of bulletin boards, possibly readable or accessible by some other type of newsreader software.

And now after posting this message, this document icon is gone, it is not visible in the thread anymore.

Been there forever. All the posts in the thread since the last time you read the thread are marked as unread. Hit refresh and since you just read the thread they all reset. Possibly useful if you check active threads on an occasional basis.

____________

Profile Gary Charpentier
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 14839
Credit: 11,693,776
RAC: 19,297
United States
Message 1265670 - Posted: 29 Jul 2012, 23:04:59 UTC

AWOL ability to edit the title of a thread you originated.

Anyone know why this was taken away?

____________

zoom314
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 51293
Credit: 38,409,748
RAC: 7,630
United States
Message 1265689 - Posted: 29 Jul 2012, 23:41:48 UTC - in response to Message 1265670.

AWOL ability to edit the title of a thread you originated.

Anyone know why this was taken away?

It wasn't as I can still do this, on an original post, not on a reply or quote.
____________
UnderDog, Pluto is a Planet to me. Basic Income for all!

Profile JulieProject donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 30867
Credit: 5,036,498
RAC: 3,060
Belgium
Message 1265931 - Posted: 30 Jul 2012, 17:32:17 UTC - in response to Message 1265689.

AWOL ability to edit the title of a thread you originated.

Anyone know why this was taken away?

It wasn't as I can still do this, on an original post, not on a reply or quote.


I thought that was something only mods can do.
____________


rOZZ

Big Bang Corollary.

Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 5332
Credit: 144,211,362
RAC: 146,383
United States
Message 1265961 - Posted: 30 Jul 2012, 18:58:55 UTC - in response to Message 1265931.

AWOL ability to edit the title of a thread you originated.

Anyone know why this was taken away?

It wasn't as I can still do this, on an original post, not on a reply or quote.


I thought that was something only mods can do.

It is convoluted, but normal users have been able to edit the topic of a thread they started.
They just have to post a new message in the thread they authored and then edit that message to get the title option.
____________
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours

Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today!

zoom314
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 51293
Credit: 38,409,748
RAC: 7,630
United States
Message 1265984 - Posted: 30 Jul 2012, 20:31:24 UTC - in response to Message 1265961.

AWOL ability to edit the title of a thread you originated.

Anyone know why this was taken away?

It wasn't as I can still do this, on an original post, not on a reply or quote.


I thought that was something only mods can do.

It is convoluted, but normal users have been able to edit the topic of a thread they started.
They just have to post a new message in the thread they authored and then edit that message to get the title option.

Correct.
____________
UnderDog, Pluto is a Planet to me. Basic Income for all!

Cosmic_Ocean
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Dec 00
Posts: 2532
Credit: 9,577,056
RAC: 4,265
United States
Message 1266279 - Posted: 31 Jul 2012, 22:49:11 UTC

I tried reading through this whole ridiculous thread to see if my complaint has been observed, but there's a lot of posts and I don't have time to read through everything.

My default has always been to display the oldest posts first, so the new ones are at the bottom, and if it is a thread that I have read before, it jumps to the first unread post and then I just read from there.

This works for the most part, until I post a reply in that thread, and then the post order changes to newest first. That's annoying. I have never once in my life read a forum thread backwards like that. I grew up learning to read top-to-bottom.
____________
Linux laptop:
Record uptime: 1484d 22h 42m
Ended due to UPS failure, as discovered 14 hours later

Current run: 1139d 23h 53m (as of 20150727_2050 UTC)

John McLeod VII
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 99
Posts: 24806
Credit: 585,753
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1266299 - Posted: 31 Jul 2012, 23:59:14 UTC - in response to Message 1266279.

I tried reading through this whole ridiculous thread to see if my complaint has been observed, but there's a lot of posts and I don't have time to read through everything.

My default has always been to display the oldest posts first, so the new ones are at the bottom, and if it is a thread that I have read before, it jumps to the first unread post and then I just read from there.

This works for the most part, until I post a reply in that thread, and then the post order changes to newest first. That's annoying. I have never once in my life read a forum thread backwards like that. I grew up learning to read top-to-bottom.

Hit the back button twice. Yes it is annoying.
____________


BOINC WIKI

Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 5332
Credit: 144,211,362
RAC: 146,383
United States
Message 1266408 - Posted: 1 Aug 2012, 13:15:36 UTC - in response to Message 1266279.

I tried reading through this whole ridiculous thread to see if my complaint has been observed, but there's a lot of posts and I don't have time to read through everything.

My default has always been to display the oldest posts first, so the new ones are at the bottom, and if it is a thread that I have read before, it jumps to the first unread post and then I just read from there.

This works for the most part, until I post a reply in that thread, and then the post order changes to newest first. That's annoying. I have never once in my life read a forum thread backwards like that. I grew up learning to read top-to-bottom.

I can't recall any written language where it is read bottom to top. If some people want to read backwards power to them, but as it has been stated. I don't see why I am forced to see posts in that manor when my settings are set otherwise.
____________
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours

Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today!

Profile arkaynProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 3851
Credit: 49,620,369
RAC: 21,742
United States
Message 1266484 - Posted: 1 Aug 2012, 18:06:42 UTC - in response to Message 1266408.
Last modified: 1 Aug 2012, 18:07:17 UTC

I tried reading through this whole ridiculous thread to see if my complaint has been observed, but there's a lot of posts and I don't have time to read through everything.

My default has always been to display the oldest posts first, so the new ones are at the bottom, and if it is a thread that I have read before, it jumps to the first unread post and then I just read from there.

This works for the most part, until I post a reply in that thread, and then the post order changes to newest first. That's annoying. I have never once in my life read a forum thread backwards like that. I grew up learning to read top-to-bottom.

I can't recall any written language where it is read bottom to top. If some people want to read backwards power to them, but as it has been stated. I don't see why I am forced to see posts in that manor when my settings are set otherwise.


DA says he has fixed this issue.

Yep...
____________

.clair.
Send message
Joined: 4 Nov 04
Posts: 1300
Credit: 29,784,666
RAC: 1,209
United Kingdom
Message 1266498 - Posted: 1 Aug 2012, 19:18:48 UTC

I do belive it so,
I have made some postings and they do apear at the bottom as required :¬)
Getting there.

Previous · 1 . . . 6 · 7 · 8 · 9

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Help.... I messed something up.

Copyright © 2015 University of California