Fast and Furious scandal |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : Fast and Furious scandal
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
US House holds Atty General Eric Holder in contempt | |
| ID: 1252935 · | |
|
Mark, actually the TeaPublicans have held Holder in contempt since he took office. | |
| ID: 1252974 · | |
|
Bob Beckel on "the five" says it's no big deal and it doesn't matter. | |
| ID: 1252995 · | |
Bob Beckel on "the five" says it's no big deal and it doesn't matter. I caught that tonight. He is wrong. There will be Some Smite From The Right and Hell Will Break Loose. SoSaysTheFourthAngel ____________ | |
| ID: 1253010 · | |
|
Holder is being disingenuous at best. He was willing to show Issa's committee the documents he said would fulfill the subpoena, as long as the contempt proceedings were stopped (sounds like a bribe), but when Issa didn't take the bait--and I wouldn't have agreed to that deal either, sight unseen--Holder whipped out a letter declaring that the very documents he just been willing to give were now protected by "executive privilege". If nothing is being covered up, then why take such extreme measures to protect documents that you were willing to reveal in one breath, but have to be "protected" in the next breath? | |
| ID: 1253082 · | |
|
Holder and Issa are both being disingenuous at best. Crap happens on both sides of this political equation. Makes it balance. | |
| ID: 1253119 · | |
Holder and Issa are both being disingenuous at best. Crap happens on both sides of this political equation. Makes it balance. I'm sure you can find examples of your claim about Holder being disingenuous, but that is not the point. In this instance, Holder was asked to explain an action by his department (sending a letter that was admitted to be false during a legitimate Congressional investigation) and he refused, relying on executive privilege . . . for documents he once was ready to reveal. One person's bad actions (Issa) do not excuse the actions of another (Holder). But besides that, this claim of privilege just smells like stonewalling. If you have nothing to hide then let the facts come out. It's a little late, after offering to reveal those documents, to then claim that they can't be revealed because they are "privileged". | |
| ID: 1253123 · | |
|
I agree that that Holder's response looks like stonewalling. My understanding though is that in back room discussions Holder offered significantly more (but not all) the documents surrounding this mess. Issa demanded ALL of them, hence the citation. | |
| ID: 1253225 · | |
|
(Reuters) - Perhaps as significant as the contempt citation Congress issued to Attorney General Eric Holder is the likelihood Republicans will also go to court to enforce a congressional demand for documents - a tactic pursued only twice before in U.S. history. | |
| ID: 1253231 · | |
|
Oh no not contempt of Congress!!! Wait they have no means of enforcing the order. Can I have one, too? | |
| ID: 1253243 · | |
|
Darrell Issa Puts Details of Secret Wiretap Applications in Congressional Record | |
| ID: 1253303 · | |
|
Yeah. | |
| ID: 1253316 · | |
|
Indeed, it would be grand if Issa resigns in the coming month. | |
| ID: 1253348 · | |
|
Darrell Edward Issa is the U.S. Representative for California's 49th congressional district, serving since 2001. He is a member of the Republican Party. He was formerly a CEO of Directed Electronics, the Vista, California-based manufacturer of automobile security and convenience products. His district consists of portions of southern Riverside County and northern San Diego County. Since January 2011, he has served as Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Issa is a self-made millionaire with a net worth estimated at as much as $450 million, making him the wealthiest currently-serving member of Congress. | |
| ID: 1253387 · | |
|
Resigning is always an option. | |
| ID: 1253461 · | |
|
Can you say Richard Nixon? Can you say Watergate? Justice Department shields Holder from prosecution after contempt vote My oh my. I bet there are a bunch of lawyers reading up the the cases from then right now. I bet real soon we have a big constitutional crises and SCOTUS will be called upon to settle it. And everything that was done to Nixon is going to be done to Holder and Obama. Payback is a bitch isn't it? Stupid idiot justice dept., just put on a super sloppy job in front of the Grand Jury and let them refuse to indict and it is over with. ____________ | |
| ID: 1253536 · | |
Message boards : Politics : Fast and Furious scandal
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |