The Mount Soledad cross

Message boards : Politics : The Mount Soledad cross

Author	Message
Misfit Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21680 Credit: 2,447,229 RAC: 0	Message 1251831 - Posted: 26 Jun 2012, 21:58:43 UTC
	The longest-running case over the meaning of the Constitution's establishment clause. Click the pic!
	ID: 1251831 ·

Sirius B Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 8807 Credit: 1,332,799 RAC: 223	Message 1251856 - Posted: 26 Jun 2012, 23:18:19 UTC
	I see you got the erosion of christianity there as well This comes to mind & wonder will America allow this occur just because of some "useless" lawyer's view of a point of law? "I remind all "modern" Americans of what your grandparents fought for..... Franklin Delano Roosevelt's annual address to congress 1941 In the future days, which we seek to make secure, we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms. The first is freedom of speech and expression--everywhere in the world. The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way--everywhere in the world. The third is freedom from want--which, translated into world terms, means economic understandings which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants-everywhere in the world. The fourth is freedom from fear--which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor--anywhere in the world". ____________
	ID: 1251856 ·

Sirius B Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 8807 Credit: 1,332,799 RAC: 223	Message 1252401 - Posted: 28 Jun 2012, 0:35:20 UTC
	With several "hot" topics on this board with one discussing God,Law, & the Constitution, totalling approx 40,000 views with several thousand posts, this thread only has 2? Doesn't a "core" issue count for anything over the pond? Or is it that in America, there is only one "deity" - the "Almighty $"? ____________
	ID: 1252401 ·

Gary Charpentier Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 11732 Credit: 5,969,877 RAC: 0	Message 1252431 - Posted: 28 Jun 2012, 1:43:41 UTC
	The deity is: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Unlike your side of the Pond where the head of the government is also the head of the religion. The real question in this case is very simple, should tax dollars be spent on a new coat of paint to keep it from rusting. ____________
	ID: 1252431 ·

Ex Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 12 Mar 12 Posts: 2892 Credit: 1,508,390 RAC: 1,301	Message 1252448 - Posted: 28 Jun 2012, 2:14:38 UTC - in response to Message 1252431.
	Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Well said Gary, and with that, I say the simple answer is NO!, tax dollars should NOT be applied. Tax dollars should never be mixed with anything of religious significance, except to protect rights of any said religion. ____________ -Dave #2 3.2.0-33
	ID: 1252448 ·

James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 7578 Credit: 25,291,457 RAC: 36,951	Message 1252622 - Posted: 28 Jun 2012, 13:15:17 UTC - in response to Message 1252448.
	Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Well said Gary, and with that, I say the simple answer is NO!, tax dollars should NOT be applied. Tax dollars should never be mixed with anything of religious significance, except to protect rights of any said religion. Seems like in public schools around my neck of the woods, they cant celebrate Christmas anymore but all the others including that made up Kwansa from 1966 is ok though. Either celebrate all cultures holidays or none. ____________
	ID: 1252622 ·

bobby Send message Joined: 22 Mar 02 Posts: 1916 Credit: 14,213,754 RAC: 3,177	Message 1252626 - Posted: 28 Jun 2012, 13:33:51 UTC - in response to Message 1252622.
	Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Well said Gary, and with that, I say the simple answer is NO!, tax dollars should NOT be applied. Tax dollars should never be mixed with anything of religious significance, except to protect rights of any said religion. Seems like in public schools around my neck of the woods, they cant celebrate Christmas anymore but all the others including that made up Kwansa from 1966 is ok though. Either celebrate all cultures holidays or none. Not sure how Kwanzaa can be interpreted as sending "a message of government endorsement of religion". The Mount Soledad cross on the other hand certainly appears to. ____________ I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...
	ID: 1252626 ·

James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 7578 Credit: 25,291,457 RAC: 36,951	Message 1252693 - Posted: 28 Jun 2012, 16:35:52 UTC - in response to Message 1252626. Last modified: 28 Jun 2012, 16:36:48 UTC
	Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Well said Gary, and with that, I say the simple answer is NO!, tax dollars should NOT be applied. Tax dollars should never be mixed with anything of religious significance, except to protect rights of any said religion. Seems like in public schools around my neck of the woods, they cant celebrate Christmas anymore but all the others including that made up Kwansa from 1966 is ok though. Either celebrate all cultures holidays or none. Not sure how Kwanzaa can be interpreted as sending "a message of government endorsement of religion". The Mount Soledad cross on the other hand certainly appears to. Sorry my unarticulated point was that public schools can no longer celebrate Christmas , But any other religion and a made up clelebration is OK. Public schools equal tax dolars in my neck of the woods. ____________
	ID: 1252693 ·

bobby Send message Joined: 22 Mar 02 Posts: 1916 Credit: 14,213,754 RAC: 3,177	Message 1253171 - Posted: 29 Jun 2012, 12:46:09 UTC - in response to Message 1252693.
	Sorry my unarticulated point was that public schools can no longer celebrate Christmas , But any other religion and a made up clelebration is OK. Public schools equal tax dolars in my neck of the woods. My taxes also fund public schools. If schools in your locality celebrate other religions holidays then I suspect this is just as much of an endorsement as celebrating Christmas. What happens on or around Sept 19th? ____________ I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...
	ID: 1253171 ·

Ex Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 12 Mar 12 Posts: 2892 Credit: 1,508,390 RAC: 1,301	Message 1253250 - Posted: 29 Jun 2012, 17:01:43 UTC Last modified: 29 Jun 2012, 17:02:09 UTC
	What happens on or around Sept 19th? Talk like a pirate day, duh... :-) ____________ -Dave #2 3.2.0-33
	ID: 1253250 ·

Terror Australis Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 14 Feb 04 Posts: 1588 Credit: 198,367,888 RAC: 22,727	Message 1253679 - Posted: 30 Jun 2012, 9:53:50 UTC
	Too many people with too much time on their hands and lawyers chasing a buck. Whatever happened to "live and let live", or "and the point of it all is ??". This just proves that atheist nutters are as bad as religious nutters and as is happening in many areas, that the US constitution is being abused in ways the Founding Fathers never intended. It's a WAR MEMORIAL for Pete's sake. Why can't it be respected as such and left alone ? T.A.
	ID: 1253679 ·

Sirius B Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 8807 Credit: 1,332,799 RAC: 223	Message 1253682 - Posted: 30 Jun 2012, 9:57:42 UTC - in response to Message 1253679.
	Well said! ____________
	ID: 1253682 ·

Message boards : Politics : The Mount Soledad cross