cumputer 3378825

Message boards : Number crunching : cumputer 3378825

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile androshalforc

Send message
Joined: 15 Jun 12
Posts: 25
Credit: 283,661
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1250015 - Posted: 22 Jun 2012, 17:06:59 UTC
Last modified: 22 Jun 2012, 17:07:31 UTC

still fairly new here and got my first inconclusive report today so i tried to do some investigating.
i found that the person checking has had some 1500 / 147 invalid / valid calculations
is this really helping and is there anything i can do to prevent them from checking files i've checked?

ID: 1250015 · Report as offensive
Profile Link
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 03
Posts: 805
Credit: 1,678,562
RAC: 44
Germany
Message 1250040 - Posted: 22 Jun 2012, 17:35:14 UTC - in response to Message 1250015.

Inconclusive results are nothing unusual and also nothing to care much about. Only if you get some errors or invalids, than it's time to see what needs to be fixed.


.

ID: 1250040 · Report as offensive
KneeDeep

Send message
Joined: 27 Sep 99
Posts: 131
Credit: 4,887,778
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1250071 - Posted: 22 Jun 2012, 18:17:06 UTC

There's an active thread on the recent rash of inconclusives here ...
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=68321

Unless you're the cause of the inconclusive (and it doesn't appear that you are) then, as Link said, there's really nothing you can do. The WU will be sent to another host for validation.

ID: 1250071 · Report as offensive
Profile Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3252
Credit: 31,903,643
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 1250074 - Posted: 22 Jun 2012, 18:32:07 UTC - in response to Message 1250071.
Last modified: 22 Jun 2012, 18:39:39 UTC

There's an active thread on the recent rash of inconclusives here ...
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=68321

Unless you're the cause of the inconclusive (and it doesn't appear that you are) then, as Link said, there's really nothing you can do. The WU will be sent to another host for validation.


Welcome to Number Crunching Forum.....
Yep, I started a thread about hosts, making (too) much inconclusive and
faulty results.
Often anonymous hosts, it'll take quite some time to 'check-out' all your
wingmen ;-)
I don't think it's recent, but don't know if there are more nowadays.
But it's a waste of resources, can overload the servers and bandwidth and
takes an extra host and time.

ID: 1250074 · Report as offensive
Tutankhamon "Communist"
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 08
Posts: 6082
Credit: 37,646,169
RAC: 16,344
Sweden
Message 1250090 - Posted: 22 Jun 2012, 19:58:07 UTC - in response to Message 1250015.
Last modified: 22 Jun 2012, 20:01:58 UTC

still fairly new here and got my first inconclusive report today so i tried to do some investigating.
i found that the person checking has had some 1500 / 147 invalid / valid calculations
is this really helping and is there anything i can do to prevent them from checking files i've checked?



This part of your questions jumped out, and needs to be addressed: is there anything i can do to prevent them from checking files i've checked?

Every WU must be checked by initially two computers, one result is not enough to make good science. Both computer must agree on the result, then and only then are the WU validated.

However it's more than common that the inital two computers does not agree on the result, or one computer errors out on the WU, so another computer will be sent the WU, this goes on for a number of times (I have forgotten the exact number of times), until there is an agreement on the result. When there's finally an agreement, the result is validated and credit is awarded.
This is a test of the Emergency Moron System. Had there been a real moron in the room, there would've been a small mushroom cloud in the place where the idiot had been standing.

ID: 1250090 · Report as offensive
Profile androshalforc

Send message
Joined: 15 Jun 12
Posts: 25
Credit: 283,661
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1250105 - Posted: 22 Jun 2012, 20:42:17 UTC - in response to Message 1250090.

still fairly new here and got my first inconclusive report today so i tried to do some investigating.
i found that the person checking has had some 1500 / 147 invalid / valid calculations
is this really helping and is there anything i can do to prevent them from checking files i've checked?



This part of your questions jumped out, and needs to be addressed: is there anything i can do to prevent them from checking files i've checked?



i meant this particular user since they seem to have a large imbalance in validated and invalidated data

ID: 1250105 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo "Socialist"
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 10511
Credit: 135,252,362
RAC: 36,943
Australia
Message 1250242 - Posted: 23 Jun 2012, 3:22:54 UTC - in response to Message 1250105.

Oh yes, Computer 3378825 (In progress (565) | Pending (15370) | Valid (134) | Invalid (1415) | Error (6) ), is 1 of about a half dozen or so of the worst PC's in a list of over 120 (and growing) of bad hosts that I've been teamed up with so far this month and likely most of those pendings it has will turn out to be invalid as well. :(

Cheers.


ID: 1250242 · Report as offensive
Profile Donald L. Johnson
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 02
Posts: 8205
Credit: 4,342,381
RAC: 5,423
United States
Message 1250301 - Posted: 23 Jun 2012, 6:20:53 UTC - in response to Message 1250105.

still fairly new here and got my first inconclusive report today so i tried to do some investigating.
i found that the person checking has had some 1500 / 147 invalid / valid calculations
is this really helping and is there anything i can do to prevent them from checking files i've checked?


This part of your questions jumped out, and needs to be addressed: is there anything i can do to prevent them from checking files i've checked?


i meant this particular user since they seem to have a large imbalance in validated and invalidated data

No, you have absolutely no control over who gets assigned as your partner/wingman. It is the luck of the draw as to who hits the scheduler with a request at the same time as you do.
Donald
Infernal Optimist / Submariner, retired

ID: 1250301 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : cumputer 3378825


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.