Radioactive fish in the Pacific |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Radioactive fish in the Pacific
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
I happen to have a friend that can arrange a full scale test. Moment magnitude 8.5, 10 KM NNE of Palo Verde. ____________ | |
| ID: 1244267 · | |
|
I think the NYTimes is the best newspaper in the world. Unfortunately, they have restricted me to no more than 10 free articles a month, so I must be careful about what I read. | |
| ID: 1244282 · | |
|
After any kinds of denials, insults it is clear anything plutonium and uranium involved affairs there is always us government trails involved. Japan has long rich military history with america so it is clear to every one that any piece of uranium in japan is always under american watch. That means even tepco messed up the proper handling of uranium facility then it was always known to the original fuel producer. | |
| ID: 1244340 · | |
|
A nuclear reactor cannot explode unless it is a fast breeder, like Phenix and Superphenix in France and Dounreay Fast Reactor in UK, all stopped for safety reasons. In Japan there is one at Tokai Mura, if I remember well, also stopped. The USA had a close call with the Fermi reactor in Detroit. A book was written about this, "The day we almost lost Detroit". | |
| ID: 1244342 · | |
A nuclear reactor cannot explode unless it is a fast breeder, like Phenix and Superphenix in France and Dounreay Fast Reactor in UK, all stopped for safety reasons. In Japan there is one at Tokai Mura, if I remember well, also stopped. The USA had a close call with the Fermi reactor in Detroit. A book was written about this, "The day we almost lost Detroit". If Detroit went, it would have taken out the kitties too.......... ____________ ****** "Ask not, what your kitty can do for you. Ask what you can do for your kitty." As it is kitten, so shall it be done. | |
| ID: 1244344 · | |
|
Depending on your definition of "explosion". | |
| ID: 1244345 · | |
|
Yeah this was definetily nuclear related explosion: | |
| ID: 1244349 · | |
Yeah this was definetily[sic] nuclear related explosion: Wow finally the first true words you have written. Translation there was an chemical explosion at a nuclear facility. Do you know what any of the numbers on those pretty charts mean in terms of human exposure? You should be able to find a bunch of pretty charts saying what level of radiation from which isotope will harm a human or a fish. The data has been out there for a long time. Why don't you make some other pretty charts to show with the levels in the Pacific how many humans will be harmed. You have the raw data already. Sure doesn't seem to be a coverup. Oh, it is safe to live at Hiroshima or Nagasaki today? Those really were what you like to impute Fukushima as. ____________ | |
| ID: 1244386 · | |
Yeah this was definetily[sic] nuclear related explosion: Come on stop being such an ignorant religious fanatics you represent some country that respect some level of common sense if not pure scientific reality. And that hiroshima explosion was tiny stuff compare to todays single nuke reactor nuking capacity. ____________ Mandtugai! | |
| ID: 1244526 · | |
And that hiroshima explosion was tiny stuff compare to todays single nuke reactor nuking capacity. I believe the gentleman has lost all credibility. ____________ | |
| ID: 1244559 · | |
And that hiroshima explosion was tiny stuff compare to todays single nuke reactor nuking capacity. I believe your ignorance and arrogance is really make sense where you originated. ____________ Mandtugai! | |
| ID: 1244569 · | |
|
How to not make a disaster worse. Do you deny its happening or get everyone the hell out of there and do your best to remedy the situation. Disasters do happen. How we deal with them is another thing.
I'd say the Japanese have done a damn fine job of protecting people the best that they could. Let's not forget and I hate repeating myself. The japanese disaster was precipitated by a massive earthquake and then a massive tsunami. Chernobyl was a monumental screw up. No earthquake no tsunami, no Tornado, no Hurricane. A badly designed Nuclear reactor and incompetence killed those people. As far as US military bases in Japan, I don't see what difference it makes. The average soldier doesn't care where their electricity is coming from just as long as they get it. /edit I should have looked this up in the first place but I assumed the poster actually knew what he was talking about. There are no US military bases anywhere near Fukushima. It's pretty easy to find them. Just google US military bases Japan. Please let us know when you are done with your anti US rhetoric. It's just stale. ____________ Proud member of TSWB. End terrorism by building a school | |
| ID: 1245043 · | |
|
Ukraine has beaten Sweden 2-1. I saw tens of thousands of people cheering their players and they looked in perfect health. | |
| ID: 1245050 · | |
|
I guess we have in asia more better type of information about japan and asian nuclear events than westerners do. What else can I say my simplistic scientific facts supported approach is seemingly totally useless against yours ignorant dismissive logics. | |
| ID: 1245230 · | |
|
It seems to me unlikely that the USA would pollute an ocean that washes on the beaches of Hawaii and California. Would they want the bikinis to become as radioactive as Bikini Island? | |
| ID: 1245281 · | |
they have restricted me to no more than 10 free articles a month, Tullio, Check the internet; there is a way around the limit. My wife was reading all she wanted. I will ask her if this is still working and send you a private message. Daddio | |
| ID: 1245284 · | |
Would they want the bikinis to become as radioactive as Bikini Island? Oh I dunno, boobs that glow in the dark, would be useful in power cuts to find your way around (the house). | |
| ID: 1245288 · | |
... I hate repeating myself. The japanese disaster was precipitated by a massive earthquake and then a massive tsunami. ... That is a very lame and pathetic excuse. There were known and reckless design deficiencies that had been highlighted many years before at the Fukushima plant. Worse still, maintenance and safe operation were compromised due to the near end-of-life of the plant and cost cutting... Nuclear plants can be made safe and reliable. The question is always at what cost... The Japanese authorities gambled and lost. They were 'lucky' the disaster hasn't been worse... So how much do you trust your life to 'luck' and the cost cutting imposed by others who live many many miles away and reap all the benefits at your risk? We have a similar situation here in the UK for our own nuclear plants. There is amazing laissez-faire that assumes we will never get earthquakes or tsunamis or rain inundations... The reality is that such events do occur and they will be 'unexpected'. So what is the cost of such unexpectedness?... Cheers, Martin ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3) | |
| ID: 1245316 · | |
|
NPR had an interview with an American worker that was in the facility to make sure it met safety and quality standards. | |
| ID: 1245352 · | |
|
Clearly there is a idiot's game going on. You can build to be safe from things that happen every 100 years on average. You can build to be safe from things that happen every 1000 years on average. You can't build to be safe from everything. What happens when the asteroid hits near the plant? | |
| ID: 1245353 · | |
Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Radioactive fish in the Pacific
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |