Is there any way to discuss racism on these boards without getting banned???/ |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : Is there any way to discuss racism on these boards without getting banned???/
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
While Congress made some moves in the right direction there are laws that are clearly racist in their impact, for example crack vs cocaine sentencing. | |
| ID: 1237403 · | |
|
Oh, the way to go is to couch one's opinions in politically correct terms and avoid saying what you really want to say.....I get it now. | |
| ID: 1237404 · | |
|
No Mark, the way is to take the raw emotion out of it, find and discuss the issue that causes the emotion. Just like any adult conversation. It can't be held at the playground level or all you get is name calling. | |
| ID: 1237430 · | |
Oh, the way to go is to couch one's opinions in politically correct terms and avoid saying what you really want to say.....I get it now. As did Mississippi Burning. Is anybody that disagrees with you going to be labeled "idiot" and "politically correct"? I posted the following to the thread you started last night: http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/dubiousquotes/a/michaelrichards.htm Yet you left in the attribution to Michael Richards here. There's also this, which includes the following: snoozn@snopes wrote: This reminds me of a Jon Stewart clip (I wish I could find it, but my youtube-fu is weak) about congressmen whining about how oppressed Christians are in this country. And Stewart comes back with something like "yes, imagine a time when a Christians could be the majority, perhaps even a 99% majority in our Congress. Imagine a time when a Christian could become president of the United States, perhaps even 43 Christians in a row." One could of course substitute "white" for "Christian" and make the same point. How did I find the links? They are the top 2 returned by a Google search for "And then there are just Americans. You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction". These days vetting is fairly easy. ____________ I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... | |
| ID: 1237442 · | |
|
I left the attribute in the open. | |
| ID: 1237474 · | |
...and start discussing real issues, which mostly will be socioeconomic ones. I would like to emphasize this statement because it is important. I think some racism stems from the belief that certain races are a certain way, when in fact this is just plain FALSE. It's certain socioeconomic groups that are a "certain way". Mainly, the poor, in inner-city drug addicted and prostitute laden neighborhoods. There is no one race that fits into this classification, as if you spent a day in the worst neighborhoods you would find people from black to white to Hispanic to Asian. The real issue, is socioeconomic. End of story. ____________ -Dave #2 | |
| ID: 1237488 · | |
I left the attribute in the open. LOL, which is the whole point. You did say you had not checked out the saying. Yet, they jumped all over you like you had the plague. In effect calling you an idiot. Yet, when you call them out for being--"The Idiot" the backpedaling has yet to stop, so much so the right to free speech, in your case, hampered for their benefit. Same has been done in my case. ;-} Just a different kind of racism, that of thought. | |
| ID: 1237489 · | |
I left the attribute in the open. My post last night was: Vetting is not hard: I know you said you did not vet it. I don't know why you didn't. ____________ I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... | |
| ID: 1237490 · | |
Ya know, Grand Torino had a lot of good points. I really like that movie. ____________ | |
| ID: 1237526 · | |
|
Ever notice? | |
| ID: 1237583 · | |
...and start discussing real issues, which mostly will be socioeconomic ones. Take identical twins. Separate at birth. One grows up in Harlem. One grows up in the Hamptons. Which one graduates Harvard? Which one gets a GED in Sing Sing? DNA plays no role. Socioeconomics is the difference. ____________ | |
| ID: 1237596 · | |
Socioeconomics is the difference. You just shot down all those wonderful rags to riches stories. Now I'm disenchanted. ____________ | |
| ID: 1237607 · | |
Socioeconomics is the difference. I never said who went where, you assumed it. Thus proving we all stereotype based on socioeconomics. Rags to riches can happen, it just isn't the usual thing, so keep believing. ____________ | |
| ID: 1237612 · | |
|
Yep. Poor people from the inner city, can grow up to do amazing things and/or become rich and or famous. It just takes a proper mindset, and requires that the tools be there to teach one that there is a way. It starts with the parents. But changes need to happen in society in general, as well. | |
| ID: 1237616 · | |
It starts with the parents. But changes need to happen in society in general, as well. Who's change? The parents, or what is forced apon them by the government gun? | |
| ID: 1237619 · | |
...and start discussing real issues, which mostly will be socioeconomic ones. Ok, take for example, my never born sister Pissonya..... ____________ ****** "Ask not, what your kitty can do for you. Ask what you can do for your kitty." As it is kitten, so shall it be done. | |
| ID: 1237668 · | |
|
Very clever | |
| ID: 1237671 · | |
Very clever Not really........ ____________ ****** "Ask not, what your kitty can do for you. Ask what you can do for your kitty." As it is kitten, so shall it be done. | |
| ID: 1237673 · | |
|
She never did make it to Hogwarts....... | |
| ID: 1237674 · | |
|
What I don't understand is that you claim you want to have a discussion about racism, yet when people attempt to engage you, all you do is get belligerent, or you think you're being cute and witty. | |
| ID: 1237675 · | |
Message boards : Politics : Is there any way to discuss racism on these boards without getting banned???/
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |