Message boards :
SETI@home Science :
Construction technics over time and 12000 miles apart.
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5
Author | Message |
---|---|
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
It sure is, and I suppose you're going to suggest that such craftsmanship can only come from extraterrestrials. Our ancestors were quite sophisticated, and that device is a perfect example of the capabilities of the human species. |
Larry Monske Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 281 Credit: 554,328 RAC: 0 |
It sure is, and I suppose you're going to suggest that such craftsmanship can only come from extraterrestrials. Our ancestors were quite sophisticated, and that device is a perfect example of the capabilities of the human species. Nope man made clocks that were very reliable for sailors to plot latitude but they came hundreds of years later. If I counted right the antythera device has 27 gears. If any of you have done gear ratios would appreaciate the required mathmatics. It predicted phases of the moon eclispes truely incredibles for its time. The time involved making it has to be admired. |
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 20283 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 |
For a discussion from some time ago, this better more succinct summary I think gives a better summary and even includes the clever 'too close' get-out clause! What is the smallest possible thing in the universe? ... We imagine that we can move any distance we like, no matter how small. This perception was exploited by Zeno in one of his famous paradoxes. Achilles could never actually get anywhere since the distance he would have to cover could be halved an infinite number of times - halfway there, halfway again, and so on. He would have to take an infinite number of ever-smaller steps to reach his goal. Mathematicians have explained this apparent paradox, and are completely comfortable with infinite numbers, as well as infinitely small distances and objects. Their answers are used in physics to describe the world inside the atom. But nature is not so comfortable with this. When we try to describe something as a "point" - an infinitely small object, that throws up some of the most intractable problems in physics. Since all of particle physics relies on "point-like" particles, reacting to forces in tiny spaces, one can anticipate trouble. This duly appears in the form of nonsense answers when the equations are used at the smallest distances. Physicists are therefore increasingly suspicious of points, and asking whether in fact Nature has a limit for the smallest possible object, or even whether there is a smallest possible space. ... The old discussion is quoted below. This should be worth a good few beers to untangle! ;-) Cheers, Martin There is great insight to be gained in why the paradox is a paradox and how the paradox works. Seeing why that particular paradox is a paradox, and what extra detail is needed to unravel that, is very significant for understanding your reality. See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.