Gay Marriage.

Unlocked. Please keep it civil.
____________

Janice

Ah so it is a Barry vs Willard thing -- but which Willard -- Willard 2012 in his TeaPublican guise, or Willard 2006 in his Massachusetts Republican mask -- a major difference between those two different political animals.

And here I thought that if someone was designed gay, it was a function of intelligent design -- silly me.

Barry's second 4 years are shot due to this issue.

And so is the issue.

Unlocked. Please keep it civil.

Prove someone is designed gay.

This science is not accepted by all. No such thing as gay gene.

I posted a while back the people are born with a conscience. I was told not all people who work with genes accept that fact.

Prove someone is designed gay.

This science is not accepted by all. No such thing as gay gene.

I posted a while back the people are born with a conscience. I was told not all people who work with genes accept that fact.

ID -- see the problem is that if one posits ID but then defines ID to fulfill one's own belief and opinion then someone else might well define ID to fulfill their own belief and opinion. You of course seem to take the position for ID but also your own brand of ID. Sadly for all of us, that simply isn't the way it works.

Prove someone is designed gay.

This science is not accepted by all. No such thing as gay gene.

I posted a while back the people are born with a conscience. I was told not all people who work with genes accept that fact.

Bottom line is that people make the life choice. They cannot claim they are being discriminated against.

I don't care what someone does within their home.

A Marriage is a public ceremony is an event of ritual significance, an enactment of law.

We restrict human behaviors everyday of the week all day long. And it is done by consinsous.

Bottom line is that people make the life choice. They cannot claim they are being discriminated against.

I don't care what someone does within their home.

A Marriage is a public ceremony is an event of ritual significance, an enactment of law.

We restrict human behaviors everyday of the week all day long. And it is done by consinsous.

As I have plainly posted here this is not a question of color or single person sex orgens. This is a question of same sex marriage.

First marriage is of God. Regardless is you believe in the Book of not 6,000 years ago [or so] marriage got it's start. It was a man and a woman. In this Book black people married white people. And brown people married yellow people. Green people married purple people. This is not an issue unless people take the Book out of context.

The law has nothing on the books about same sex marriage in the federal laws called the Constitution. Therefore they cannot claim they are being discriminated against. 38 states say it is not allowed. An admendment can be called for and a law can be made to disallow it. In my own home state of Illinois marriage is not allowed but unions are. If there was a full vote of the people not even that would be allowed.

Marriage is for the sake of the children involved. Im sure your chompin at the bit to tell me all about childless couples who have made the choice not to have children. That is their choice and I'll not force anyone to have children nor will anyone else. But the hoi polloi by vote after vote do not want gay marriage. Bottom line...

I have to agree with ID on one thing. The majority of the people do not want gay marriage. And the majority of people should not gay marry. This does not give to them the right to dictate how others must live.

I do not see how their religious views on it should effect those who have no religious nor moral issues with it. Those who believe the predominant science
that indicates sexual preference is nature and not choice should not be over-ruled by those who believe in some books that were highly edited and bound together in a multitude of fashions over thousands of years.

Indeed, there is biblical information indicating that Jesus had a physical relationship with Peter. There is not actual proof of not, since no DNA tests were done.

We are not a country based on one religion. Nor should we be.


____________

Janice

Bobby,

I think I see the thought process as clear as St. Peter does.

You must judge others so that you can do God's work. God's work is vengeance. He must cast the first stone, because Jesus died for him and therefore he is without sin.

My hypothesis could be wrong, but it appears to fit all observed data.

ID -- marriage was for property rights (including woman as property).

The 'hoi palloi' voted for prohibition, then they unvoted it. Times change. This can be unsettling for one so stoked in an absolute, concrete and fixed view of the world.

I have to agree with ID on one thing. The majority of the people do not want gay marriage. And the majority of people should not gay marry. This does not give to them the right to dictate how others must live.

I do not see how their religious views on it should effect those who have no religious nor moral issues with it. Those who believe the predominant science
that indicates sexual preference is nature and not choice should not be over-ruled by those who believe in some books that were highly edited and bound together in a multitude of fashions over thousands of years.

Indeed, there is biblical information indicating that Jesus had a physical relationship with Peter. There is not actual proof of not, since no DNA tests were done.

We are not a country based on one religion. Nor should we be.

??????...biblical information of...physical relationship...??????

Do tell and quote the book fully and to the direct point of the matter at hand. Sources... Theologians.....

In the Greek language there are 4 names for our one word love. I warn you now so we can close this subject just as soon as possible---the word Eros is NOT EVER ONCE USED in the Bible.

Prove you point Ma'am. Or recant your statement.

Im sorry but you are mistaken, there are 4.

C.S. Lewis, 4 kinds of love, perhaps?

You also are mistaken about the word eros it is not used.

Your saying it does not make a thing called, proof.

Would you like a link to the Bible in Greek and then translated to English?

You would not be, apparently, a Theologian, nor very well informed of the Book.

Im sorry but you are mistaken, there are 4.

C.S. Lewis, 4 kinds of love, perhaps?

You also are mistaken about the word eros it is not used.

Your saying it does not make a thing called, proof.

Would you like a link to the Bible in Greek and then translated to English?

You would not be, apparently, a Theologian, nor very well informed of the Book.

Eros is ancient greek.

It is not found in the text. Bottom line.

Please cite your Sources... Theologians.....

Or retract......