Gay Marriage. |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : Gay Marriage.
Previous · 1 . . . 17 · 18 · 19 · 20
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
ID - same sex marriage, or full right civil union is about equal rights -- your 'they' suggests a vantage point -- then again, you have been very open about your vantage point (vantage points). They represent a clear bright line of what you see as right and wrong, good and bad, fortunately, you views are not as widely held as you might believe. What the F--- are you not getting about excluding a group of people whereas it is OK for everyone else is clear-cut discrimination? Who the f--- are you or anyone else to restrict their behavior if it is legal for everyone else? (See? I can add swears to make myself more assertive too!) | |
| ID: 1236794 · | |
We are talking about the public behavior of gay people getting married. It is a public affair, court house for license, new paper report, change of last name for woman and SS#. And a longer list....... Preventing a single group of people from haveing sex with little children is clear-cut regulation of public and private behavior. Equal rights means what is allowed within the country by the people themselves, by good morals---AND ethics. I reject bad ethics and approve of good morals. | |
| ID: 1236796 · | |
It is a public affair, court house for license, new paper report, change of last name for woman and SS#. And a longer list....... Agreed, it is a notice to the state and to our federal government that two people are now joined as one. Excluding a specific group is discrimination. Otherwise it is a private affair. You don't have to be involved. Preventing a single group of people from haveing sex with little children is clear-cut regulation of public and private behavior. Agreed, but we're not talking about those behaviors, remember? Equal rights means what is allowed within the country by the people themselves, by good morals---AND ethics. So all gays are blanket cases of bad morals and ethics? And you're trying to tell me you're not discriminating? | |
| ID: 1236798 · | |
We are talking about the public behavior of gay people getting married. So, in your country the public behavior wasn't allowed, did that stop gay people from having sex with one another in private? Ive not said that you should be affected by the laws of foreign countries... Im saying as It dosnt afected people in my country, then I have to ask what will be the harmful you will suffer if the gay marriage were aproved in your country... And the question was not directed specifically to you or anybody in particular, but you are one of the ones against it, I guess you should have a good reason, so Im curious about it... ____________ | |
| ID: 1236810 · | |
And the question was not directed specifically to you or anybody in particular, but you are one of the ones against it, I guess you should have a good reason, so Im curious about it... Yeah, its called bigotry and self-righteousness. Thought I'm not convinced those are good reasons. | |
| ID: 1236812 · | |
I would prefer the wording of the "Act" to be "of two or more persons", but that's just my preference. Ah HA! So you're admitting there's tyranny of the majority in Canada! (I've been accused of the same thing.) | |
| ID: 1236828 · | |
|
Im discriminating about correct behavior and incorrect behavior. That is determaned by morals and ethics, that is established by the people themselves. | |
| ID: 1236908 · | |
Im discriminating about correct behavior and incorrect behavior. That is determaned by morals and ethics, that is established by the people themselves. Well, now we're getting somewhere. You admit that you're discriminating. The problem is, why do you think its OK for a group, or even a majority to tell people that they can't do something when everyone else is allowed to? That is a double-standard, and that is precisely why it needs to be stopped. Do you actually think that by denying gays the right to marry, that you're going to stop their "immoral" and "unethical" behavior? What gives you or any other group the right to tell people what is moral or ethical if it doesn't harm anyone, doesn't violate anyone's rights, and is fully consensual? What other behaviors would you outlaw that you don't agree with? Would you only stop when the entire world bends to your will and your views? I'd ask what's the problem with you, but I think we already know the answer to that. | |
| ID: 1236946 · | |
Im discriminating about correct behavior and incorrect behavior. That is determaned by morals and ethics, that is established by the people themselves. The same right that gives us the right to tell NAMBLA that they will go to jail for acting on their wishes in THEIR miniorty group. Any more questions? Are you smarter then a 5th grader? Was you in that special class for very special people that just couldn't keep up with the rest of us? | |
| ID: 1236991 · | |
The same right that gives us the right to tell NAMBLA that they will go to jail for acting on their wishes in THEIR miniorty group. But we're not talking about pedophilia, we're talking about consensual adults. Why is it OK for you to tell two adults they cannot marry? | |
| ID: 1237006 · | |
The same right that gives us the right to tell NAMBLA that they will go to jail for acting on their wishes in THEIR miniorty group. Because God and the common consensus agree that they should not. Much alone the laws of simple revolutionary theory. ____________ ****** "Ask not, what your kitty can do for you. Ask what you can do for your kitty." As it is kitten, so shall it be done. | |
| ID: 1237014 · | |
The same right that gives us the right to tell NAMBLA that they will go to jail for acting on their wishes in THEIR miniorty group. Doesn't matter what you think God said, and the "common consensus" doesn't get a say in what other people do so long as it is consensual and doesn't violate anyone else's rights. There are religious organizations out there that are willing to marry same-sex people and disagree with you on what God allegedly said. Much alone the laws of simple revolutionary theory. Gay sex happens in the animal kingdom all the time, regardless of evolution theory. | |
| ID: 1237022 · | |
Message boards : Politics : Gay Marriage.
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |