Panic Mode On (74) Server problems? |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (74) Server problems?
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 . . . 11 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Hmmmm... Well, let's hope so. If you're wrong, we're going down like never before... LOL ____________ /The grumpy old Swede. "I'm so old, that 98% of all trees in the forest, are younger than I am" | |
| ID: 1221734 · | |
Oh no, he mentioned the yellow fellow.... Why did you have to say 'danger zone'? The first thing that instantly popped into my mind was http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2MeX45Kk6Q. ____________ Linux laptop uptime: 1484d 22h 42m Ended due to UPS failure, found 14 hours after the fact | |
| ID: 1221744 · | |
|
| |
| ID: 1221756 · | |
Hmmmm... I think "Cur: nan bits/sec" argues that there is no data coming in from the inr-250 router, and the script which presents those numbers is smart enough not to include those "Not A Number" values in the averages. There's an overall page for the inr-250 router at http://fragment1.berkeley.edu/newcricket/grapher.cgi?target=%2Frouter-interfaces%2Fsum-tier2%2Fsum-tier2-inr-250;ranges=d;view=Octets which is also blank for the same period, and there the averages are shown as zero. Joe | |
| ID: 1221797 · | |
Hmmmm... Looks like they fixed it as I see ink once again. ____________ | |
| ID: 1221802 · | |
|
I'm getting : | |
| ID: 1222387 · | |
|
And half an hour later it's working again. Never mind. | |
| ID: 1222400 · | |
|
And here we go again. status page says everything is back up after the weekly outage, but.. | |
| ID: 1222828 · | |
|
I've got the same problem as Cliff does, can upload, but not report, as to downloading I have no idea yet. | |
| ID: 1222834 · | |
I've got the same problem as Cliff does, can upload, but not report, as to downloading I have no idea yet. No real worries, its nothing a large hammer and some chewing gum wont cure:-) Cheers, ____________ Cliff, Been there, Done that, Still no damm T shirt! | |
| ID: 1222836 · | |
|
Everything works perfectly here. Upload, reporting, getting new work, and downloading. All swift and with a download speed seldom seen. | |
| ID: 1222845 · | |
|
I wonder what happened here? | |
| ID: 1223052 · | |
I wonder what happened here? ....whilst avoiding knocking the power plug out of the wall outlet and thus avoiding an unplanned outage, the cleaner accidentally sucked up a few wu's that were lying around. It'll be in the dust bag ... ;-) More seriously, I can't recall seeing something like this before! Is (was) it one of yours? ____________ | |
| ID: 1223120 · | |
I wonder what happened here? The WU was finished, the record was purged. From the number I judge it was created April 18 or 19. With an average turnaround around 3 days, many WUs will be finished and assimilated in one or two days. The records are purged a day after that. If your host is still doing a task for that WU or something, none of that should have happened yet. What prompted the question? Joe | |
| ID: 1223156 · | |
If your host is still doing a task for that WU or something, none of that should have happened yet. What prompted the question? My GPU processed the WU (only a few hundred seconds of run time), all the other GPUs errored out (similar runtimes). Just curious as to why one was able to run it, all the others errored out. ____________ Grant Darwin NT. | |
| ID: 1223234 · | |
If your host is still doing a task for that WU or something, none of that should have happened yet. What prompted the question? If the others were running stock and got -12 errors, it's probably because the optimized GPU app you're running can handle two triplets in the same array and stock can't. Whatever, I assume the WU has been discarded for too many errors and probably was afflicted with RFI so that's not unreasonable. Joe | |
| ID: 1223245 · | |
|
Are we not validating much atm? My RAC's not rising much. | |
| ID: 1223582 · | |
Are we not validating much atm? My RAC's not rising much. We had a second round of re-estimation this week, which tends to result in over-fetching and tasks being crunched out of order/returned slowly. That leads to increased pending tasks. But RAC is always a blunt, crude, slow measure for assessing performance. Just keep an eye on the counts of the various categories at the top of your task lists, and the ratio between them? | |
| ID: 1223585 · | |
|
Holy bovine, Batman! It's been over 28-3/4 hours since the last post in the Panic Mode thread. Can things possibly be that right with the world??? | |
| ID: 1224069 · | |
Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (74) Server problems?
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |