Message boards :
Number crunching :
Inconclusive Work Units Running AP Ver 6
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 |
Don't know whats wrong with this: It has been Alpha tested, and in is the process of being Beta tested at Seti Beta (on mass by hundreds of computers), Normally the GPU Astropulse apps get tested by a couple of Alpha testers, then maybe a few Beta testers before release, so far more testers have tested it than normal, What is worse, users running Released/Beta apps that do overflow when they shouldn't, causing resends, or running a fixed version that shouldn't? Claggy |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 |
Thats in case of the nvidia bug. ATI version does have the issue, I've had it, and seen other hosts that have it too, there's just less ATI hosts round here, Claggy |
Mike Send message Joined: 17 Feb 01 Posts: 34253 Credit: 79,922,639 RAC: 80 |
Thats in case of the nvidia bug. We should discuss this at Lunatics. With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. |
Mike Send message Joined: 17 Feb 01 Posts: 34253 Credit: 79,922,639 RAC: 80 |
Yes, you are Sten. Its a Lunatics app and we are responsible. We want to get it fixed, same like Eric. So more Info we get the better. With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. |
BilBg Send message Joined: 27 May 07 Posts: 3720 Credit: 9,385,827 RAC: 0 |
I don't think you can access the result files "sent back from the wingman" (you probably can check the stderr but this is useless for validation) And really - if they have known bug in their previous app and already have (supposedly) fixed and "sufficiently" tested new app it will be better for someone that notices errors on his tasks with the old app to: A) change to the new app; or B) stop using the old (any) app until the new app is double or triple "sufficiently" tested  - ALF - "Find out what you don't do well ..... then don't do it!" :)  |
Wembley Send message Joined: 16 Sep 09 Posts: 429 Credit: 1,844,293 RAC: 0 |
Don't know whats wrong with this: I tried to get the new AP app from beta and all I get is this: 2012-05-14 08:04:20 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Started download of astropulse_6.03_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia_100.exe 2012-05-14 08:04:28 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Finished download of astropulse_6.03_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia_100.exe 2012-05-14 08:04:28 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Started download of libfftw3f-3.dll 2012-05-14 08:04:28 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Unable to verify astropulse_6.03_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia_100.exe using certificates 2012-05-14 08:04:28 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Checksum or signature error for astropulse_6.03_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia_100.exe 2012-05-14 08:04:38 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [sched_op] Deferring communication for 1 min 8 sec 2012-05-14 08:04:38 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [sched_op] Reason: Unrecoverable error for task ap_20au10ae_B0_P1_00280_20120514_13983.wu_0 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files:<file_xfer_error> <file_name>astropulse_6.03_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia_100.exe</file_name> <error_code>-123</error_code></file_xfer_error>) 2012-05-14 08:04:43 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Finished download of libfftw3f-3.dll 2012-05-14 08:04:43 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Started download of ap_cmdline_6.03_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia.txt 2012-05-14 08:04:43 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Unable to verify libfftw3f-3.dll using certificates 2012-05-14 08:04:43 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Checksum or signature error for libfftw3f-3.dll 2012-05-14 08:04:44 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Finished download of ap_cmdline_6.03_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia.txt 2012-05-14 08:04:44 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Started download of astropulse_6.03_opencl_nvidia_AUTHORS 2012-05-14 08:04:44 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Unable to verify ap_cmdline_6.03_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia.txt using certificates 2012-05-14 08:04:44 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Checksum or signature error for ap_cmdline_6.03_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia.txt 2012-05-14 08:04:45 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Finished download of astropulse_6.03_opencl_nvidia_AUTHORS 2012-05-14 08:04:45 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Started download of astropulse_6.03_opencl_nvidia_COPYING 2012-05-14 08:04:45 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Unable to verify astropulse_6.03_opencl_nvidia_AUTHORS using certificates 2012-05-14 08:04:45 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Checksum or signature error for astropulse_6.03_opencl_nvidia_AUTHORS 2012-05-14 08:04:46 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Finished download of astropulse_6.03_opencl_nvidia_COPYING 2012-05-14 08:04:46 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Started download of astropulse_6.03_opencl_nvidia_COPYRIGHT 2012-05-14 08:04:46 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Unable to verify astropulse_6.03_opencl_nvidia_COPYING using certificates 2012-05-14 08:04:46 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Checksum or signature error for astropulse_6.03_opencl_nvidia_COPYING 2012-05-14 08:04:47 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Finished download of astropulse_6.03_opencl_nvidia_COPYRIGHT 2012-05-14 08:04:47 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Started download of astropulse_6.03_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia_100.pdb 2012-05-14 08:04:47 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Unable to verify astropulse_6.03_opencl_nvidia_COPYRIGHT using certificates 2012-05-14 08:04:47 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Checksum or signature error for astropulse_6.03_opencl_nvidia_COPYRIGHT 2012-05-14 08:05:23 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Finished download of astropulse_6.03_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia_100.pdb 2012-05-14 08:05:23 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Started download of AstroPulse_Kernels_r1305.cl 2012-05-14 08:05:23 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Unable to verify astropulse_6.03_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia_100.pdb using certificates 2012-05-14 08:05:23 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Checksum or signature error for astropulse_6.03_windows_intelx86__opencl_nvidia_100.pdb 2012-05-14 08:05:25 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Finished download of AstroPulse_Kernels_r1305.cl 2012-05-14 08:05:25 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Started download of ap_20au10ae_B0_P1_00280_20120514_13983.wu 2012-05-14 08:05:25 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Unable to verify AstroPulse_Kernels_r1305.cl using certificates 2012-05-14 08:05:25 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | [error] Checksum or signature error for AstroPulse_Kernels_r1305.cl |
JohnDK Send message Joined: 28 May 00 Posts: 1222 Credit: 451,243,443 RAC: 1,127 |
Try using the r1305 app (aka 6.03) and AstroPulse_Kernels_r1305.cl from Seti Beta, that has the fix. I'm getting some errors using this app, WU completes but there's warnings. I've been running r560 without problems. <core_client_version>6.10.60</core_client_version> http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=2441995069 |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 |
Those aren't problems, they all should be Info Only Messages, Basically Raistmer has used his own device detection, and when the app first runs it needs to compile AstroPulse_Kernels_r1305.cl_GeForceGTX560M.bin_V6 and oclFFTplan_GeForceGTX560M_32768_r1305.bin, once they are compiled they won't need to be compiled again, If you run the latest ATI MBv7 app there are quite a few more oclFFTplans compiled. Claggy |
JohnDK Send message Joined: 28 May 00 Posts: 1222 Credit: 451,243,443 RAC: 1,127 |
Those aren't problems, they all should be Info Only Messages, Basically Raistmer has used his own device detection, OK, but what about this warning: BOINC failed to provide OpenCL device, using own enumeration abilities |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14650 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Those aren't problems, they all should be Info Only Messages, Basically Raistmer has used his own device detection, That's because you're using the outdated BOINC v6.10.60, which doesn't have built-in OpenCL device detection. You need to upgrade to BOINC v7 before BOINC can provide an OpenCL device number. |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 |
Those aren't problems, they all should be Info Only Messages, Basically Raistmer has used his own device detection, You're running Boinc 6.10.60, and this is an OpenCL app, Boinc 6.10.60 has told the app to use a Cuda device when it's expecting to use a OpenCL device, This is what Boinc 7.0.27 on my 9800GTX+ reports: <core_client_version>7.0.27</core_client_version> http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/result.php?resultid=10820754 Claggy |
JohnDK Send message Joined: 28 May 00 Posts: 1222 Credit: 451,243,443 RAC: 1,127 |
OK, just strange I didn't get the warning with r560 which I assume is also an OpenCL app. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14650 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
OK, just strange I didn't get the warning with r560 which I assume is also an OpenCL app. It's a chicken and egg situation. Until there was a version of BOINC which supplies OpenCL device numbers, Raistmer ccouldn't write an application which used the device numbers which BOINC wasn't supplying yet. And if there was no way of getting the right numbers, there wasn't really much point in bellyaching about getting the wrong numbers. Now that there's a way of getting it right (upgrade to BOINC v7.0.27), it's become worth pointing out that it's being done wrong - while at the same time falling back on the workround which allowed it to work before. |
perryjay Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3377 Credit: 20,676,751 RAC: 0 |
Another inconclusive from today... http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=990731598 PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC |
perryjay Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3377 Credit: 20,676,751 RAC: 0 |
Okay, my last inconclusive came in today. All three of us validated. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=990731598 PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19014 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
Just got one, my computer reported minutes ago. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=975800759 |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14650 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Just got one, my computer reported minutes ago. So yours is the one with Jason's r557, against stock? Need to keep an eye on the final outcome of that one. |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19014 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
yesJust got one, my computer reported minutes ago. against stock? Need to keep an eye on the final outcome of that one.Will do. Don't think I am going anywhere in the next two weeks, after that not sure yet, waiting for confirmation of scheduled meeting down south, but don't think other party is ready yet. |
perryjay Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3377 Credit: 20,676,751 RAC: 0 |
Here's another from me... http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=991437515 PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19014 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
yesJust got one, my computer reported minutes ago. That task must have validated, as it no longer on the task list. It was there just before maintenance, but not there now. But I have zero invalid or errors. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.