64KB Output filesize limitation |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : 64KB Output filesize limitation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
This wu is producing large output files. Three pc's, so far, have identical -131 error text.
12-Apr-2012 14:19:22 [SETI@home] Computation for task 29se11aa.21883.2382.12.10.109_2 finished
12-Apr-2012 14:19:22 [SETI@home] Output file 29se11aa.21883.2382.12.10.109_2_0 for task 29se11aa.21883.2382.12.10.109_2 exceeds size limit.
12-Apr-2012 14:19:22 [SETI@home] File size: 68146.000000 bytes. Limit: 65536.000000 bytes
Lt | |
| ID: 1217630 · | |
|
I downloaded the data file, and it's 404 KB in size (compared to the normal 367 KB) | |
| ID: 1217635 · | |
|
I had one from that same 29se11aa.21883 group a few days ago. Which I didn't think much of at the time. Checking the file it was 404KB like the one you checked as well. 04/11/2012 10:15 AM 413,626 29se11aa.21883.2382.12.10.212
04/11/2012 10:15 AM 413,626 29se11aa.21883.2382.12.10.204
04/11/2012 10:15 AM 413,627 29se11aa.21883.2382.12.10.230
04/11/2012 10:15 AM 413,628 29se11aa.21883.2382.12.10.221
04/11/2012 10:15 AM 413,628 29se11aa.21883.2382.12.10.219
04/11/2012 10:15 AM 413,628 29se11aa.21883.2382.12.10.209 Where other tasks in the 29se11aa.21883.10980. & 29se11aa.21883.11798 groups are the normal 375,222 byte size. ____________ SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today! | |
| ID: 1217652 · | |
|
The ones I've found have all been shorties - 14-day deadlines, typical of VHAR. | |
| ID: 1217655 · | |
The ones I've found have all been shorties - 14-day deadlines, typical of VHAR. The current tasks & the one previous one I had are all 55.95. I found one where my wing mate has successfully completed the task. So it looks like at least some of them will be OK. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=968984952 Unless this is one of those cases where it is an issue when using the opt apps. Looking at the 4 that Lint trap had. The stock app seems to have completed the tasks OK & the opt app ended up with the -131. ____________ SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today! | |
| ID: 1217660 · | |
|
Unless this is one of those cases where it is an issue when using the opt apps. Looking at the 4 that Lint trap had. The stock app seems to have completed the tasks OK & the opt app ended up with the -131. By completed OK, you mean the output filesize didn't exceed the limit ? If it's just a case of the Opt-apps being too wordy, perhaps Lunatics could check for that and somehow limit the output text to stay under 64KB, or, the limit could be changed ? Lt | |
| ID: 1217703 · | |
The ones I've found have all been shorties - 14-day deadlines, typical of VHAR. Hmm, for the one HAL9000 linked, the first two coordinate sets are <coordinate_t>
<time>2455834.2627723</time>
<ra>15.211767558555</ra>
<dec>18.111415397339</dec>
</coordinate_t>
<coordinate_t>
<time>2455834.4264586</time>
<ra>19.048461812708</ra>
<dec>17.949663297908</dec>
</coordinate_t> Almost all the AR=56 is in that pair, they're nearly 4 hours apart in both time and ra. The 368 coordinate sets make the header section 58562 bytes, so adding a few signals to that size header can easily make a result file over 65536. Joe | |
| ID: 1217706 · | |
No, it wouldn't help. The wordy Lunatics stuff is in stderr_txt, which gets sent to the server by a different channel when you report the task. The 64KB limit is on the uploaded result file which one would expect to be identical - that's the intention, anyway, otherwise the results won't validate. Unless there's something subtle like the stock app producing a file with Unix-style line endings (CR only), and the Opti apps using Windows line endings (CR-LF). In a file with a lot of short lines, that can make a big difference. | |
| ID: 1217716 · | |
The ones I've found have all been shorties - 14-day deadlines, typical of VHAR. Lt's first report, relating to a 404 KB data file, was only 2.5KB over the limit. So the second set I listed, with 392 KB data files, will almost certainly be OK, unless they find a large number of signals. But we're certainly on the margin. | |
| ID: 1217719 · | |
Thanks for re-explaining that! I always have trouble with the distinctions. It's clearer now. Lt | |
| ID: 1217725 · | |
|
Some extra observations: | |
| ID: 1217755 · | |
If it would help anything. I could setup a system to process the 7 files I saved with each app and then zip up the result files for someone to grab and look over. ____________ SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today! | |
| ID: 1217776 · | |
|
I had a task end in error with a -131. A search brought me here. At least now I know what the error means. If it doesn't reoccur I won't worry about it. Thanks | |
| ID: 1217939 · | |
... I did do an offline comparison run with the 29se11aa.21883.2382.12.10.217 WU. Stock 6.03 produced a 66019 bytes result file, AK_v8b2 65758 bytes. IOW, both would have incurred a -131 error. Both apps produce LF only line endings. The 261 byte difference is because 6.03 was built in 2008 with an older version of the workunit header structure so has a few more lines of header in the result file. That makes the observed cases where stock did not error but optimized did even more puzzling. With the coordinates obviously wrong in some ways, the positions of any found signals wouldn't be known properly. IMO it is preferable to error out the WUs rather than assimilate bad results, but not a big deal since 99.9999...% of the signals in the science database are no more meaningful. Joe | |
| ID: 1217974 · | |
|
| |
| ID: 1218549 · | |
Message boards : Number crunching : 64KB Output filesize limitation
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |