Message boards :
Politics :
Climate Change, 'Greenhouse' effects, Environment, etc part III
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 . . . 27 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Reed Young Send message Joined: 23 Feb 06 Posts: 122 Credit: 81,383 RAC: 0 |
Ridiculous. Charging and discharging batteries is at best only 70% efficient in both directions. It takes electricity to charge a battery, not necessarily an engine. Wow. |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
Ridiculous. To be fair most electricity is generated by some kind of fossil fuel engine. [/quote] Old James |
Reed Young Send message Joined: 23 Feb 06 Posts: 122 Credit: 81,383 RAC: 0 |
FALSE: There isn't a battery operated car out there that get over 100 miles a charge. FACT: Model S has three battery options. (And don't forget that the Chevy Volt's 40 mile all-electric range is equal to or more than ~80% of all daily commutes in the United States.) FUD: Cost is the only factor. FACT: Technologies always cost more when they're new. ANOTHER FACT: Electric motors require far less maintenance even than diesel engines. Total costs of ownership of electric cars and gasoline cars are already much closer than initial purchase price. |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
FALSE: Is that 40 miles one way or round trip? I ask because I dont think many employers would let you charge your car off of thier dime. [/quote] Old James |
soft^spirit Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 6497 Credit: 34,134,168 RAC: 0 |
Ridiculous. To be fair that is incorrect. Janice |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
And to be fair that is for PG&E only. I added up that pie chart for fossil fuel use. Came out to 21.8% But then I see the unspecified sources at 22.9% what is that? Also in the eligible renewal catagory at 15%, 26.6% of that is bio and waste. If you burn it it is fossil fuel. Now how about the mid west where they have those big coal fired plants? Or natural gas. Here in NY we are lucky we have hydro and Nuke power. But we also have coal and natural gas plants. I dont like my power bill now let alone plugging a car in every damn day. [/quote] Old James |
soft^spirit Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 6497 Credit: 34,134,168 RAC: 0 |
Might I suggest going to your local utility website and trying to find the same information. Bio waste is "renewable". It is basically sewage or garbage, from renewable sources and carbon neutral. This is not FOSSIL fuel. I would presume Unspecified is from out of state sources and they do not have specific numbers on it. So electricity from Oregon/Washington would be primarily hydro/nuclear, and from nevada most likely nuclear/solar/hydro. But certainly saying it is primarily fossil is FALSE. Janice |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30593 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
Ridiculous. Sorry to burst your bubble, but even the sun is an engine. May not use a 4 stroke piston in cylinder method, but still an engine. And even a turbine to extract power from flowing water or air is an engine. The definition of engine is much broader than the thing in a car. |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30593 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
Bio waste is "renewable". It is basically sewage or garbage, from renewable sources and carbon neutral. Brilliant. So garbage which requires the extraction of fossil fuel to make because the fossil fuel (oil) is incorporated into the garbage is a renewable source. Never mind the transportation of this garbage or the energy needed to originally make it, or the transportation of the workers to the plants that make it, we will just call it renewable and the world is fine. Brilliant. I just love the thinking of people who just want to feel good, wave their arms and say "make it so". No wonder people refuse to understand the actual situation we find ourselves in, if the models are correct. |
Intelligent Design Send message Joined: 9 Apr 12 Posts: 3626 Credit: 37,520 RAC: 0 |
You two beating each other up isnt solving anything. How about some ideas instaed of bashing each others belife about global warming. You should remove the thread. Just to be fair... ...just sayin. |
Intelligent Design Send message Joined: 9 Apr 12 Posts: 3626 Credit: 37,520 RAC: 0 |
Record high levels of pack ice at the poles this year.! Lovin it! LOL! |
Reed Young Send message Joined: 23 Feb 06 Posts: 122 Credit: 81,383 RAC: 0 |
Ridiculous. I'm familiar with that usage, but then, what was the point of stating the obvious fact that "it takes an engine to charge a battery?" Using "engine" in that broad way, "it takes an engine to charge a battery" becomes batteries can be charged by the Sun or wind. I agree, and that's practical, feasible, zero-pollution, and a significant part of the solution to the global energy problem. |
Intelligent Design Send message Joined: 9 Apr 12 Posts: 3626 Credit: 37,520 RAC: 0 |
Hate mail. Flaming. |
Reed Young Send message Joined: 23 Feb 06 Posts: 122 Credit: 81,383 RAC: 0 |
Is that 40 miles one way or round trip? I ask because I dont think many employers would let you charge your car off of thier dime. That's round trip. About 80% of commuters live within 20 miles of where they work, many within just a few miles, so whether their "employers would let you charge your car off of thier dime" isn't even an issue for the vast majority of people. I'm sure we all agree, 80% of auto commuters emitting zero pollution would be a huge step in the right direction. Anybody with a longer commute could put some gas in a Chevy Volt, or find a true all-electric vehicle with sufficient range (more battery, no gas tank). Based on the Tesla Model S range of 300 miles per charge on an 85kW battery (driving 55mph with ideal conditions the entire time), on a full charge the 80kW battery in the Nissan Leaf should be able to comfortably take it 100 miles each way without needing to recharge. Maybe a bit more, but who wants to commute more than 100 miles anyway? |
Reed Young Send message Joined: 23 Feb 06 Posts: 122 Credit: 81,383 RAC: 0 |
I challenge that assertion. Voltaic cells... have only just got past the point were they generate more power over their lifetime than it took to produce them... Do you have a source for that claim? |
soft^spirit Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 6497 Credit: 34,134,168 RAC: 0 |
Bio waste is "renewable". It is basically sewage or garbage, from renewable sources and carbon neutral. Until we stop making garbage(and this board is an excellent indication we will not) it is not only a renewable, but a renewed source. Shall we haul it a bit further to dump in our rivers/lakes and oceans? Shall we land fill it and let produce untaped methane to be released constantly? I am trying to understand the attempted bait and switches.. You said it is a "fossil fuel". I said it is not. Now you are suggesting in a round about way that some fossil fuels may have been used to produce it in the first place. This is really reaching and seems awfully desperate. Please show some respect for those that read this drivel?? Is it a perfect fuel? Of course not. But to suggest it is the same as digging dinosaur remains up from millions of years ago is simply not true. And before it was being used as a sizable slice of our energy mix the question was "well where are we going to dump it?" Janice |
Reed Young Send message Joined: 23 Feb 06 Posts: 122 Credit: 81,383 RAC: 0 |
Ridiculous. If you burn it it is fossil fuel. We only call it "fossil fuel" if it hasn't been biomass for millions of years. "How renewable are biofuels, really?" is a legitimate question, and they indisputably put CO2 in the atmosphere. But they are also indisputably not the same thing as fossil fuels. |
Reed Young Send message Joined: 23 Feb 06 Posts: 122 Credit: 81,383 RAC: 0 |
Oops. I used the wrong units for the Nissan Leaf's battery. That should be 80kWh, and 85kWh for the longest-lasting battery available in the Tesla Model S, not kW, but you knew that already. ;^) |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30593 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
Plastic "most commonly derived from petrochemicals." A lot ends up as garbage. It is fossil oil. Fuel, well, I suppose it wasn't burned so you get a half point. |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30593 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
http://www.livescience.com/25793-changing-environment-human-evolution.html Erratic Environment May Be Key to Human Evolution At Olduvai Gorge, where excavations helped to confirm Africa was the cradle of humanity, scientists now find the landscape once fluctuated rapidly, likely guiding early human evolution.These findings suggest that key mental developments within the human lineage may have been linked with a highly variable environment, researchers added. To learn more about the roots of humanity, scientists analyzed samples of leaf waxes preserved in lake sediments at Olduvai Gorge, identifying which plants dominated the local environment around 2 million years ago. This was about when Homo erectus, a direct ancestor of modern humans who used relatively advanced stone tools, appeared. Scientists had long thought Africa went through a period of gradually increasing dryness — called the Great Drying — over 3 million years, or perhaps one big change in climate that favored the expansion of grasslands across the continent, influencing human evolution. However, the new research instead revealed "strong evidence for dramatic ecosystem changes across the African savanna, in which open grassland landscapes transitioned to closed forests over just hundreds to several thousands of years," researcher Clayton Magill, a biogeochemist at Pennsylvania State University, told LiveScience. "I was surprised by the magnitude of changes and the rapid pace of the changes we found," Freeman told LiveScience. "There was a complete restructuring of the ecosystem from grassland to forest and back again, at least based on how we interpret the data. I've worked on carbon isotopes my whole career, and I've never seen anything like this before." The team also found links between changes at Olduvai Gorge and sea-surface temperatures in the tropics. "Early humans went from having trees available to having only grasses available in just 10 to 100 generations, and their diets would have had to change in response," Magill said in a statement. "Changes in food availability, food type, or the way you get food can trigger evolutionary mechanisms to deal with those changes. The result can be increased brain size and cognition, changes in locomotion and even social changes — how you interact with others in a group." Is it counterproductive to humans on a long term basis to attempt to stop global warming? @Martin, no where does this post take a position for or against the reality or falisity of global warming or its possible causes. If you attack it on that basis you are a fool. A valid question to ask is are the models being used today able to predict the rapid climate changes observed there in the past. The answer is important if you realize that to stop warming we must deny industrialization to over 75% of the worlds population of humans, something not to be taken lightly. China's explosive CO2 growth showing that it is impossible to industrialize and control with technology we have today, so denial becomes the only option. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.