Panic Mode On (72) Server problems?

Author	Message
Dave Send message Joined: 29 Mar 02 Posts: 778 Credit: 25,001,396 RAC: 0	Message 1209641 - Posted: 24 Mar 2012, 13:37:16 UTC 6.10.60 it is then :). However I am going to pioneer having both BOINCs going at once so I get some 6.x.x productivity whilst NNT-ing the 7.0.23. ID: 1209641 ·

Dave Send message Joined: 29 Mar 02 Posts: 778 Credit: 25,001,396 RAC: 0	Message 1209644 - Posted: 24 Mar 2012, 13:46:25 UTC Ok it just replaces the existing version. Can't get any tasks anyway. Just 7.0.23 NNT. ID: 1209644 ·

Khangollo Send message Joined: 1 Aug 00 Posts: 245 Credit: 36,410,524 RAC: 0	Message 1209776 - Posted: 24 Mar 2012, 19:53:49 UTC Whoa. From shortie straight to vlar storm. I do wish they had some kind of "smarter" splitters that would shuffle tasks more. ID: 1209776 ·

Dave Send message Joined: 29 Mar 02 Posts: 778 Credit: 25,001,396 RAC: 0	Message 1209791 - Posted: 24 Mar 2012, 21:05:01 UTC Sounds like HT or app_info.xml is a bad idea in that scenario. Swings & roundabouts overall. I'm still burning off my 7.0.23 tasks before I get with you lot on proper food... ID: 1209791 ·

kittyman Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004	Message 1209820 - Posted: 24 Mar 2012, 22:32:01 UTC Holey smoley...... Better turn the cooling fans on high before I go to Lori's for the evening. Out of about 1500 MB GPU tasks cached on my top rig the Frozen 920, over 1000 are shorties now. It's gonna be a hard crunching night for the ol' beastie. "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster ID: 1209820 ·

Grant (SSSF) Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13731 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304	Message 1209822 - Posted: 24 Mar 2012, 22:34:52 UTC - in response to Message 1209778. Well, I did get a ton of shorties/VHAR's, and all of them for my poor Q8200 CPU, which hates to do them. On the Q8200 CPU, a shortie becomes the longest running WU available, especially if you run four of them at the same time. If you run only one at a time on the CPU, it'll take 50 minutes or less. If you run 4 of those buggers, they can take 5 to six hours. Odd. I'm running the Lunatics applications. My E8400 does 2 shorties at a time in about 40min. VLARs take about 3hrs 2 at a time. I wouldn't have thought 333MHz would make that much difference. Grant Darwin NT ID: 1209822 ·

Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14650 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874	Message 1209896 - Posted: 25 Mar 2012, 0:58:52 UTC - in response to Message 1209827. Well, I did get a ton of shorties/VHAR's, and all of them for my poor Q8200 CPU, which hates to do them. On the Q8200 CPU, a shortie becomes the longest running WU available, especially if you run four of them at the same time. If you run only one at a time on the CPU, it'll take 50 minutes or less. If you run 4 of those buggers, they can take 5 to six hours. Odd. I'm running the Lunatics applications. My E8400 does 2 shorties at a time in about 40min. VLARs take about 3hrs 2 at a time. I wouldn't have thought 333MHz would make that much difference. It's not about the Mhz, it's about how the Q8200 handles the memory sub system I think. It's only the VHARs that behaves like this. VLAR's and normal AR's are done in around 3 hours give or take 30 minutes, depending upon the AR's. I'm not the only one here, who have seen this behaviour from the Q type CPU's, where they really struggles with VHAR's. Agreed. I've seen this effect ever since I first got my dual E5320 octo-core - that predates the consumer Qs by about 9 months, but is very similar core2 technology. It's specific to the VHAR tasks, but I've never seen it to anything like the degree that Sten is reporting. An increase from 30 minutes to 50 minutes (double that - those are the old-style tasks), maybe - with 8-way contention on the bus. But six or seven times the runtime? No way. You have some other problem there, or simply not enough memory. ID: 1209896 ·

Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489	Message 1209949 - Posted: 25 Mar 2012, 4:23:16 UTC - in response to Message 1209946. My i5 2500K @ stock does a VHAR in 20mins and VLARs take no longer than 1hr 15mins, regular units take about 50mins. :) Cheers. ID: 1209949 ·

Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489	Message 1209959 - Posted: 25 Mar 2012, 4:59:46 UTC - in response to Message 1209956. Its running stock so far with turbo boost off. ;) Cheers. ID: 1209959 ·

Dave Send message Joined: 29 Mar 02 Posts: 778 Credit: 25,001,396 RAC: 0	Message 1210119 - Posted: 25 Mar 2012, 19:15:06 UTC Well I've just loaded the GPUs up with PrimeGrid while I'm waiting to burn off these 7.x.x CPU MBs & I got one eorld record prime unit that's been round the world 21 times, so I'll be busy elsewhere for a bit. ID: 1210119 ·

Jord Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3	Message 1210154 - Posted: 25 Mar 2012, 21:14:56 UTC - in response to Message 1209959. I thought mine was as well, but apparently it's not. According to Intel's Turbo Boost Technology Monitor, it runs at 3.40Ghz, not the stock 3.30GHz. ID: 1210154 ·

Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489	Message 1210167 - Posted: 25 Mar 2012, 22:06:04 UTC - in response to Message 1210154. I thought mine was as well, but apparently it's not. According to Intel's Turbo Boost Technology Monitor, it runs at 3.40Ghz, not the stock 3.30GHz. Yes you're right, it does run a 100MHz overclock with those settings, but once I get it in a HAF-X I'll turn that up by around 1GHz which should make an even bigger difference. Cheers. ID: 1210167 ·

Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489	Message 1210216 - Posted: 26 Mar 2012, 4:06:58 UTC - in response to Message 1210167. Last modified: 26 Mar 2012, 4:08:23 UTC I thought mine was as well, but apparently it's not. According to Intel's Turbo Boost Technology Monitor, it runs at 3.40Ghz, not the stock 3.30GHz. Yes you're right, it does run a 100MHz overclock with those settings, but once I get it in a HAF-X I'll turn that up by around 1GHz which should make an even bigger difference. Cheers. But then again with those settings that I have that is still considered as stock. Cheers. ID: 1210216 ·

Keith T. Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Aug 99 Posts: 962 Credit: 537,293 RAC: 9	Message 1210258 - Posted: 26 Mar 2012, 11:15:01 UTC Last modified: 26 Mar 2012, 11:17:21 UTC 26/03/2012 12:05:47 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 26/03/2012 12:05:47 SETI@home Requesting new tasks 26/03/2012 12:05:55 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/03/2012 12:05:55 SETI@home Message from server: Project has no tasks available 26/03/2012 12:11:01 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 26/03/2012 12:11:01 SETI@home Requesting new tasks 26/03/2012 12:11:04 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/03/2012 12:11:04 SETI@home Message from server: Project has no tasks available SETI@home server status information is also available in XML. [As of 26 Mar 2012 \| 11:00:04 UTC] Results ready to send 241,023 My local TZ is UTC+1, BST (UK daylight savig time) ID: 1210258 ·

Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489	Message 1210263 - Posted: 26 Mar 2012, 11:49:49 UTC - in response to Message 1210258. 26/03/2012 12:05:47 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 26/03/2012 12:05:47 SETI@home Requesting new tasks 26/03/2012 12:05:55 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/03/2012 12:05:55 SETI@home Message from server: Project has no tasks available 26/03/2012 12:11:01 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 26/03/2012 12:11:01 SETI@home Requesting new tasks 26/03/2012 12:11:04 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/03/2012 12:11:04 SETI@home Message from server: Project has no tasks available SETI@home server status information is also available in XML. [As of 26 Mar 2012 \| 11:00:04 UTC] Results ready to send 241,023 My local TZ is UTC+1, BST (UK daylight savig time) You're likely be missing out as I'm sucking them down. :D Cheers. ID: 1210263 ·

zoom3+1=4 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65738 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49	Message 1210265 - Posted: 26 Mar 2012, 11:54:32 UTC - in response to Message 1210263. 26/03/2012 12:05:47 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 26/03/2012 12:05:47 SETI@home Requesting new tasks 26/03/2012 12:05:55 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/03/2012 12:05:55 SETI@home Message from server: Project has no tasks available 26/03/2012 12:11:01 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 26/03/2012 12:11:01 SETI@home Requesting new tasks 26/03/2012 12:11:04 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/03/2012 12:11:04 SETI@home Message from server: Project has no tasks available SETI@home server status information is also available in XML. [As of 26 Mar 2012 \| 11:00:04 UTC] Results ready to send 241,023 My local TZ is UTC+1, BST (UK daylight savig time) You're likely be missing out as I'm sucking them down. :D Cheers. Well Ya missed 14, don't worry I got them. :D The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's ID: 1210265 ·

Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489	Message 1210266 - Posted: 26 Mar 2012, 11:56:53 UTC - in response to Message 1210265. Mine are back on the dreaded limits now so go for your life before I need some more. ;) Cheers. ID: 1210266 ·

zoom3+1=4 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65738 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49	Message 1210274 - Posted: 26 Mar 2012, 12:41:53 UTC - in response to Message 1210266. Mine are back on the dreaded limits now so go for your life before I need some more. ;) Cheers. The 590 is always near the limits. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's ID: 1210274 ·

Keith T. Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Aug 99 Posts: 962 Credit: 537,293 RAC: 9	Message 1210378 - Posted: 26 Mar 2012, 17:51:00 UTC - in response to Message 1210258. 26/03/2012 12:05:47 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 26/03/2012 12:05:47 SETI@home Requesting new tasks 26/03/2012 12:05:55 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/03/2012 12:05:55 SETI@home Message from server: Project has no tasks available 26/03/2012 12:11:01 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 26/03/2012 12:11:01 SETI@home Requesting new tasks 26/03/2012 12:11:04 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26/03/2012 12:11:04 SETI@home Message from server: Project has no tasks available SETI@home server status information is also available in XML. [As of 26 Mar 2012 \| 11:00:04 UTC] Results ready to send 241,023 My local TZ is UTC+1, BST (UK daylight savig time) I continued to get failed requests until one of my 2 running tasks was about 3 minutes to go. I tried [ipconfig/flushdns] and got 3 new tasks at the next request. ID: 1210378 ·

shizaru Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 14 Jun 04 Posts: 1130 Credit: 1,967,904 RAC: 0	Message 1210671 - Posted: 27 Mar 2012, 12:31:34 UTC My netbook got this msg a minute ago: 27/03/2012 15:13:24 SETI@home Requesting new tasks for CPU 27/03/2012 15:13:34 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 27/03/2012 15:13:34 SETI@home Message from server: No tasks sent 27/03/2012 15:13:34 SETI@home Message from server: This computer has reached a limit on tasks in progress Daddy is sooooo proud of you, little one!:D ID: 1210671 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.