Message boards :
Number crunching :
SETI@home preferences page
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 |
Can we please have a "Use ATI GPU" box on the pref page? It's a choice on Beta's pref page, but not here. That's because there's an ATI application listed on Beta's application page, but there isn't one here. Oh yea, +1 here too. Claggy |
Mike Send message Joined: 17 Feb 01 Posts: 34257 Credit: 79,922,639 RAC: 80 |
Agreed, would be much easier for us ATI guys. With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Can we please have a "Use ATI GPU" box on the pref page? It's a choice on Beta's pref page, but not here. I was thinking the other day when they added the "SETI@home v7:" option last week that they should have added the ATI GPU option as well. As the logic of "no options unless there is a stock app" isn't being applied any longer. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
Unfortunately it's a completely different situation. SETI@home v7 is just an empty holder. To get the ATI GPU option on the BOINC global preferences there must be an app_version with an ATI plan_class. It could be done, but would be messy. They could add another app called e.g. Ectoplasm and then install in it a do-nothing app_version called BustTheGhost v1 with an ATI plan_class. Then the ATI GPU option would show, but also Ectoplasm would be splashed around the same places SETI@home v7 is now showing. As long as they never created any work for that app, no harm would be done (though they might possibly need to have a dummy assimilator program too). Joe |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Wow I didn't think they had to do all of that since it has existed at beta for a while. In that they had already created everything, but just needed to turn it on. I had figured the apps were just a sub-component of the larger type, like SETI@home Enhanced or Astropulse. That plan class bit throws me off all the time. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.