Message boards :
Number crunching :
team ranking
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
646 Send message Joined: 20 Aug 00 Posts: 7 Credit: 168,834 RAC: 0 |
inside the teams themselves, how is the raking of users determined? andrew velker <a href="http://andrewvelker.com"><br /> <img src="http://seti2.mundayweb.com/stats.php?userID=523"><br /> _____________________________________ www.andrewvelker.com |
Toby Send message Joined: 26 Oct 00 Posts: 1005 Credit: 6,366,949 RAC: 0 |
They are currently unsorted which means it spits them out in whatever order the database returns. I know on our team, it looked like it was ordered but total credit under seti@home classic. This is probably just a result of how they imported the classic accounts into the BOINC tables. If you want to be able to sort team members, you will have to go to 3rd party stats sites such as my own or the SS stats that you seem to have found for your sig graphic. A member of The Knights Who Say NI! For rankings, history graphs and more, check out: My BOINC stats site |
Doomlord Send message Joined: 3 May 01 Posts: 21 Credit: 2,821,336 RAC: 1 |
> inside the teams themselves, how is the raking of users determined? > It is sorted by Account Number. That is determined by: Seti@Home accounts sorted by number of WUs processed at the time of the first data splurge.. followed by New Accounts sequencially as created. Thats why it often looks like number of results, because the hi-powered S@H users are often the hi-powered BOINC users. <img src="http://www.boincstats.com/stats/banner.php?cpid=f098ec1961b5cdf855cbac04a444071f"> |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.