Parents role in Education ? |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : Parents role in Education ?
Previous · 1 . . . 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 . . . 21 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Gary!! no-no-no...the 70's was brilliant for it's disco music and has never IIRC it did get radio air play and that would put it "on the charts" and into a compilation. ____________ | |
| ID: 1301043 · | |
|
In Message 1300198 I expressed the view that I didn't like course work because there could be manipulation by the teachers. Well the latest from Ofqual (the office that supervises education standards in the UK) on the fiasco about the English results agrees. Teachers are today accused of perpetrating a widespread abuse of the exams system by bumping up the marks of their pupils to get them top-grade GCSE passes. In a report, the exams watchdog Ofqual claims that a widespread loss of integrity in the profession has led many teachers to deliberately inflate coursework marks. Guardian - English GCSEs overmarked by teachers pushed to limit, says regulator Children have been let down by an exam system that was open to abuse by teachers under pressure to achieve good grades. BBC - Pressurised teachers 'marked GCSE too generously' Too much pressure on schools in England to get good GCSE grades led to over-generous marking of coursework by teachers, the exams watchdog concludes. | |
| ID: 1301150 · | |
In Message 1300198 I expressed the view that I didn't like course work because there could be manipulation by the teachers. Well the latest from Ofqual (the office that supervises education standards in the UK) on the fiasco about the English results agrees. I guess those league tables, performance pay and bullying by heads really paid off then. ____________ In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams | |
| ID: 1301157 · | |
|
Did you really expect anything different? | |
| ID: 1301159 · | |
Speaking to BBC Radio Four's Today programme, Ms Stacey added she believed teachers had marked the test "optimistically", rather than with a deliberate intention to inflate grades. School funding depends upon exam results and Ofsted inspection grading. This is wrong. Schools should be given the funding that they need. If anything poorly performing schools should be given more money to sort it out, not less! I only have FE experience here. But Colleges are only allowed to mark internally and grade pupils as pass or fail, provided that regular inspections by the awarding body, show that there is a robust enough QA system in place, to maintain proper standards. When that is not the case then coursework and exams have to be externally moderated. But money talks in education. Every Ofsted inspection we were told about a certain sixth form college in a stockbroker belt of southern england, that was regularly marked as "outstanding". Of course they were! Just look at their catchment area, most of their pupils came from a private education background, and were well above average ability. With their level of fees they could afford to hire the best teachers. You can't compare that with inner city life. The way forward is to take money out of the equation, have sensible exams, with no pressure to over mark, and stop this dumbing down. I think Gove may be on the right track. | |
| ID: 1301217 · | |
Ms Stacey added she believed teachers had marked the test "optimistically", rather than with a deliberate intention to inflate grades. But that doesn't quite agree with what teacher Aa said in the Independents version. We have to cheat': Aa teacher confesses Which basically is what I suspected all along with teacher assessments, is that once somebody see's there is a method to inflate the results then everybody assumes everybody else is and so they also do it. Result, grade inflation, the very thing that most politicians and teachers have said is not happening. | |
| ID: 1301224 · | |
Ms Stacey added she believed teachers had marked the test "optimistically", rather than with a deliberate intention to inflate grades. All I know is that in my early years of teaching I gave honest reports and grades to my classes. I got abuse at parents evening from a parent that left me in tears and the headtecher instead of backing me up also laid into me. I learned never to do that again. I got told that all the other teachers had given good reports to the same kids so I must be wrong, but I knew from staffroom discussion that the other teachers had exactly the same issues with exactly the same kids. My conclusion was that the other teachers had learned to lie on their reports to protect themselves from the parents and head. Later when performance pay came in I can only imagine the situation got worse. Add to that more frequent OFSTED inspections, terrible behaviour of the pupils and it always being the teachers fault no matter what, it's no wonder I never want to teach in the UK again and still have nightmares about it. Do you know that the average career of a teacher in inner cities in 4 years before they quit? There is reason for that. It's the only job I've ever worked in where management feel it is ok to scream at a teacher as if they were a disobedient child. I was so shocked when I first saw it happen. Now I am just disgusted at the culture of bullying in UK schools. The teachers get bullied by the parents, the management, the media and the government, yet all they want to do is what is best for the kids they teach. I don't think the overall standard of the actual exams of courses has changed, I could be wrong, I do know that I always taught to the correct standard. I do completely believe that teachers are bullied into over inflating their marks. However, it would be a slight effect, in science the coursework is only worth 20%. The rest is national exam. All coursework is moderated by other teachers to ensure that it is being marked properly, also some is chosen by the exam board to be moderated independently. If the marks are glaringly inconsistent coming from one school then the all the coursework from that school is inspected. Any over marking should be picked up before final marks are awarded. I can't comment on other exams because I am not sure what the component of coursework is, by I do now that they also put in safeguards to moderate their coursework. ____________ In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams | |
| ID: 1301295 · | |
|
ES | |
| ID: 1301302 · | |
|
I also fully endorse Es's remarks. I think it may not be as bad in the year 1-6 age groups, but certainly the year 7-11's are a total nightmare. I taught a year 11 all girls IT class for one term, then told the Dean that he had to find someone else, as it was a total waste of everybody's time. They just saw it as a way to skive off from school for a day and mess around. | |
| ID: 1301312 · | |
|
There are some more teachers comments in a follow up in the Telegragh 'We have to cheat, nanny and fiddle', teachers say I feel I am being made to cheat. I've taught the kids and then let them do the tasks - we have to do them in the classrooms, except for those who need access arrangements, who are under the beady eye of external invigilators. I taught my kids, gave them the opportunity to make notes, and then did the damned things like an exam. Result? Lots of them underperformed against their targets. Not good enough. This work, I am told, is really coursework, and has to be at target grade, or they will not reach their targets at the end of the course. Others in the department have done marked drafts. I'm now feeling pressured to get some of mine to redo various pieces. I've voiced my objections, but have been told that the long and the short of it is that they have to be nannied through at every stage - there is disbelief when I say that some schools are doing the CAs as exams. I resent the implication that I am failing my kids, when actually what they produce is probably more accurate as an indication of their abilities than their target grades are. The sooner this nonsense is stopped and we go back to 100 per cent exams, the better. | |
| ID: 1302021 · | |
|
Yes, these days its all about meeting target grades to survive in league tables. The profession seems to have forgotten that along the way, you're actually supposed to teach the kids something. But, there are increasing numbers of teachers that are now speaking up and making their views known. And in far too many cases the grades "achieved" do not match the actual abilities of the pupils. | |
| ID: 1302027 · | |
All I know is that in my early years of teaching I gave honest reports and grades to my classes. I got abuse at parents evening from a parent that left me in tears and the headtecher instead of backing me up also laid into me. I learned never to do that again. You must have missed the part of your liberal indoctrination that discriminating against equal outcome for any kid was wrong to begin with. It took this event to teach you that you must have been born a racist/bigotted/homophobe. I don't blame you for being a liberal, I blame the hippie movement of the 60's. | |
| ID: 1302041 · | |
|
Qbert - I do hope that was not a personal attack upon ES99. | |
| ID: 1302049 · | |
Qbert - I do hope that was not a personal attack upon ES99. ABSOLUTELY NOT! I'm just pointing out what modern liberalism is. Modern liberalism is the problem in public education. Public education has been indoctrinating liberals since the hippie movement of the 60s. Liberalism teaches discrimination is wrong. Wrong in ALL cases. You see, to discriminate is to say someone is right and someone is wrong. To say someone is right or wrong is what's been happening in human civilization for the past 50,000 years. Since nothing in recent human history has rid us of war, crime and poverty, everything in recent human history is wrong. What we've been doing for the past 50,000 years is judging people. Therefore, judging people is the problem as defined by modern liberal philosophy. If we quit judging people, we'll get rid of all war, poverty and crime. That's what modern liberalism is. | |
| ID: 1302055 · | |
Qbert - I do hope that was not a personal attack upon ES99. Wow, from a retired "educator" telling another poster "Well why mess about, go and join the National Front or the BNP". If that's not a racist remark then neither is Qberts post a personal attack. For those who don't know what the NF or BNP is - check for yourselves: - National Front BNP Stop being a hypocrite! ____________ | |
| ID: 1302061 · | |
All I know is that in my early years of teaching I gave honest reports and grades to my classes. I got abuse at parents evening from a parent that left me in tears and the headtecher instead of backing me up also laid into me. I learned never to do that again. Sorry Qbert, I never got that memo. I guess you don't really know what happened during my liberal brainwashing indoctrination after all. ____________ In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams | |
| ID: 1302208 · | |
Qbert - I do hope that was not a personal attack upon ES99. Discrimination is wrong. You see, to discriminate is to say someone is right and someone is wrong. This is not discrimination. You are incorrect, you also know that I am definitely at the very least a liberal and have no compunction about telling anyone at all when I think they are wrong. To say someone is right or wrong is what's been happening in human civilization for the past 50,000 years. Since nothing in recent human history has rid us of war, crime and poverty, everything in recent human history is wrong. What we've been doing for the past 50,000 years is judging people. Therefore, judging people is the problem as defined by modern liberal philosophy. If we quit judging people, we'll get rid of all war, poverty and crime. Wars, crime, murder etc are actually on the decline and are at lower rates than they have ever been in history. It's still not good enough, but as long as we keep getting more liberal things will continue to improve. Good old liberalism. Helping civilisation to progress for thousands of years. ____________ In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams | |
| ID: 1302211 · | |
Qbert - I do hope that was not a personal attack upon ES99. There's more than one meaning of the word discriminate: verb (used without object) From what I understand, liberalism (and a few other "isms") believe the first meaning to be "wrong", if you do not, please explain why. As for the second meaning, I'm not sure I know of any "ism" that is against that. As for the history of saying someone is right or wrong, you may well be correct in your estimation of its heritage, though saying something is so, does not make it so, for that it helps to have evidence. You say you are "just pointing out what modern liberalism is" though provide no evidence in support of what you say. Why should anybody believe you? ____________ I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... | |
| ID: 1302307 · | |
|
bobby, | |
| ID: 1302351 · | |
Public education has been indoctrinating liberals since the hippie movement of the 60s. Liberalism teaches discrimination is wrong. Wrong in ALL cases. You see, to discriminate is ... Dang dem Libs (that came in with Dewey, about 3-4 decades before the hippy 60s)! I sure hope dem Libs don't mess mah kids up on dat Quadratic Equation ... err, Formula (1). Cuz I done heard you can duhstinguish a difference between 2 real solutions (and wedder they be integers, rationals or irr-LIBBER-asstional), a single real solution (repeated, hens Mikey Keaton "Multiplicity") or 2 complex solutions (eye hates those imaginary nummers!). No how they does it? By using a thingy called a DISCRIMINANT. BTW, the floor needs worshed in here. | |
| ID: 1302370 · | |
Message boards : Politics : Parents role in Education ?
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |