x38g vs x41g on an i5 750 w/3 GTX295 cards or whatever

Message boards : Number crunching : x38g vs x41g on an i5 750 w/3 GTX295 cards or whatever
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65745
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 1179595 - Posted: 20 Dec 2011, 22:16:43 UTC
Last modified: 20 Dec 2011, 22:17:52 UTC

You have Mail Jason, As I suspected I was able to install 285.79 without too many problems, update and physics would not install for some unknown reason, but other than that 285.79 works and for the moment is the end of the line, unless I go the route of renaming Drive D: to C: and then doing a lot of tedious work replacing D:\ with C:\ in the registry and I'd rather not, as once was enough under XP Pro x64. I also ran the test over again this time in a copy of the test folder with all the old results deleted.
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 1179595 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1179599 - Posted: 20 Dec 2011, 22:23:34 UTC

I wonder what it would think of my Intel computer, the "C" drive has linux installed on it currently.

"D" is the Windows drive.

ID: 1179599 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65745
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 1179603 - Posted: 20 Dec 2011, 22:33:17 UTC - in response to Message 1179599.  

I wonder what it would think of my Intel computer, the "C" drive has linux installed on it currently.

"D" is the Windows drive.

I'd not touch 290.36 as It will leave orphan files and cause reboot issues cause of someone at nvidia who made an error in one file as where to install at, It took Me hours of rebooting and restoring to try and work My way out of It, only the driver I'd had installed before trying to install 290.36 worked right.

So My recommendation and advice is that If Your Windows Drive is not in C:\ to stay away from 290.36, If It is, then go ahead and install 290.36.

Victor
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 1179603 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1179609 - Posted: 20 Dec 2011, 23:09:50 UTC - in response to Message 1179603.  

I wonder what it would think of my Intel computer, the "C" drive has linux installed on it currently.

"D" is the Windows drive.

I'd not touch 290.36 as It will leave orphan files and cause reboot issues cause of someone at nvidia who made an error in one file as where to install at, It took Me hours of rebooting and restoring to try and work My way out of It, only the driver I'd had installed before trying to install 290.36 worked right.

So My recommendation and advice is that If Your Windows Drive is not in C:\ to stay away from 290.36, If It is, then go ahead and install 290.36.

Victor


That machine will stay on 266.58 anyway as it also crunches AP on the GTX460.

I have 290.36 installed on my GTX560 machine as I am running a CUDA 4.1rc build.

ID: 1179609 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : x38g vs x41g on an i5 750 w/3 GTX295 cards or whatever


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.