Co-ordination with Kepler planet finder |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : Co-ordination with Kepler planet finder
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
I think searching should be co-ordinated with the Kepler planet finder results. So as soon as Earth like planets are discovered, we should immediatly search that area of space for radio transmissions. Results of new planets found aroung other stars are prolific enough now that this would end a lot of wasted number crunching for not knowing where to look. | |
| ID: 1179072 · | |
|
seti@home is allowed to collect data piggyback style. When someone is working with the dish seti records as well. We don't really have a choice in the matter. Though in the past they have been able to dedicate some time listening to previous candidate sites | |
| ID: 1179145 · | |
|
When more planets like this are confirmed in the future, other frequencies should be examined besides what SETI monitors. I forget what it is, or if there are more than one. It's certainly possible that extraterrestrials are using other frequencies. It shouldn't be difficult to continuously scan all radio frequencies from just one source like this. If I had money I'd certainly have an observatory or two. | |
| ID: 1179171 · | |
|
No our search is in the "quiet" 1420 Mhz level. searching other areas would force the team to really dig deep since there is so much terrestrial noise being produced at other frequencies | |
| ID: 1179193 · | |
|
Don't know what "Gaussian" means in the context of SETI. A gaussian (Bell shaped) curve implies a random process. A random process would tend to rule out intelligence in the signal. | |
| ID: 1179347 · | |
Don't know what "Gaussian" means in the context of SETI. ... A Gaussian signal strength profile is what is expected if the field of view for the receiving radio dish scans across a continuous transmission. This can be expected to happen for example when Arecibo is 'idle' and the Earth's rotation causes the reception field of view to scan across the sky. You will get smaller width Gaussians if the radio telescope is being swept across the sky for positioning to a target or if scanning following a survey pattern for example. Keep searchin', Martin ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3) | |
| ID: 1179354 · | |
|
A strong signal yes. But, also some modulation either on-off, phase, frequency or amplitude modulation counting out the prime numbers or the first 50 digits of pi for example. | |
| ID: 1179392 · | |
|
They won't know who "Us" is until possibly hundreds or thousands of years later or at least 8 years later than they originally sent the message since the nearest star is four light-years away. They are not likely to keep beaming at a far distant planet for this period of time unless they have previously received a signal from us telling them where we are. If they heard our spurious signals then we would have heard them also by now in all likelyhood if they were as far along in technology as we were 100 years ago. Remember there are relatively few stars out to 100 light years from the Earth. | |
| ID: 1179408 · | |
|
Unfortunately, it's unlikely our random radio signals (TV, radio, etc.) will ever be detected by an alien civilization on their planet. After a few light-years they become indistinguishable from background radiation left over from the Big Bang. We need to intentionally sent an immensely strong signal into space in order for an alien civilization to detect it (to overcome the inverse square law). The same is true on their part in order for us to detect their signals, assuming their regular transmissions aren't much stronger than ours. | |
| ID: 1179446 · | |
|
Duane, it brings home to you the thought of how remote our chances | |
| ID: 1179744 · | |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : Co-ordination with Kepler planet finder
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |