"Cloaked" object near Mercury? |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : "Cloaked" object near Mercury?
1 · 2 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
OK, I'm looking for a plausible explanation here. This showed up on Yahoo News earlier this evening. As a CME was passing Mercury it apparently lit up an object in the vicinity. UFO advocates are claiming it is a cloaked space ship. | |
| ID: 1176424 · | |
|
It's a function from how the software creates the image. | |
| ID: 1176425 · | |
|
I read the explanation but it made about as much sense to me as the UFO hunter's and I'm not one to promote conspiracy theories. | |
| ID: 1176431 · | |
|
Even some the digital cameras (that are on the market) have that function for long exposures noise cancelation. It is usually called dark-frame substraction or long time noise reduction. | |
| ID: 1176490 · | |
|
they basically do image averaging, which eliminates objects that are being viewed. So you don't see Mercury but you do see its ghost being hit by the CME. Once again it's interesting to see someone use their imagination instead of actually using science | |
| ID: 1176511 · | |
they basically do image averaging, which eliminates objects that are being viewed. So you don't see Mercury but you do see its ghost being hit by the CME. Once again it's interesting to see someone use their imagination instead of actually using science People want to believe. There's no arguing against it. Sort of like trying to argue with someone with strong religious beliefs. Point out the facts and move on is about all you can do. :| ____________ | |
| ID: 1176568 · | |
|
Yep, that video is proof aliens are cloaking themselves and hiding behind Mercury. | |
| ID: 1176635 · | |
|
Johnney, I would suggest that we need rather more scientific proof than that to take it any further. It is pretty hot in Mercury's area, I would doubt ET would sensibly be there if they didn't need to. But it is up to you of course. | |
| ID: 1176636 · | |
Johnney, I would suggest that we need rather more scientific proof than that to take it any further. It is pretty hot in Mercury's area, I would doubt ET would sensibly be there if they didn't need to. But it is up to you of course. Ahhhhh Chris, Don't be a spoil-sport, tell the White house about the video! They deserve to know! Anyway, they could be hot little aliens that like the warm climate near Mercury. You get a really great Sun Tan there, really quick too!! Full body Tan in 3.1 seconds! John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1176640 · | |
|
I think Knut should volunteer to contact the White House with this information | |
| ID: 1176790 · | |
|
there is occasionally a thing called humour injected into these threads. | |
| ID: 1176820 · | |
|
Music, I am sure there are some posters in this forum who hear alien voices. | |
| ID: 1176894 · | |
|
It's just my opinion of course, but I think this "news" got way too much attention. The source of that glow is definitely known to be an artifact of the method used to eliminate noise, but people are still posting this around claiming a cloaked ship exists. | |
| ID: 1177362 · | |
It's just my opinion of course, but I think this "news" got way too much attention. The source of that glow is definitely known to be an artifact of the method used to eliminate noise, but people are still posting this around claiming a cloaked ship exists. Amazing, everyone screams photoshop when they see real unaltered picture, yet when they see a photoshopped picture they scream it is real. Follow the money. ____________ | |
| ID: 1177368 · | |
It's just my opinion of course, but I think this "news" got way too much attention. The source of that glow is definitely known to be an artifact of the method used to eliminate noise, but people are still posting this around claiming a cloaked ship exists. They like conspiracies. If something is explained then their conspiracy crumbles. Therefore, they reject it and label it a coverup. I, however, am a believer of Occam's Razor. | |
| ID: 1177371 · | |
|
Just to be sure you all understand my opinion here I trust the explanation given by NASA, I just don't quite understand it, not being a photoshop expert. What got me was that news agencies actually gave the wild explanation air time. | |
| ID: 1177405 · | |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : "Cloaked" object near Mercury?
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |