Kepler-22b: The new Earth? |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : Kepler-22b: The new Earth?
1 · 2 · 3 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
NASA scientists with the Kepler program have confirmed, for the first time, a planet in the 'habitable zone' in an other solar system. | |
| ID: 1175908 · | |
|
I wonder if the aliens we are searching for are going to come and give us the technology to go to a planet this far away. | |
| ID: 1175911 · | |
|
Dr. Jill Tarter of the SETI Institute announced that Kepler 22b and other promising planets discovered by the Kepler Project will soon be monitored for intelligent radio signals at the newly reopened Allen Telescope Array. IF this planet is inhabited, and *if* its inhabitants had the ability and inclination to send a strong radio beam our way 600 years ago, we may not have to wait too long for confirmation of life on the planet. | |
| ID: 1175938 · | |
|
Actually 600 light years is in close. We might be able to hear spurious radiation from radio/tv or radar at this distance if it exists. What else do we know about this planet. What does a spectrometer show for atmosphere. | |
| ID: 1175940 · | |
|
The composition of the planet and its atmosphere are not known. Knowing its size, its density and so its composition can be inferred, once its mass is learned. Kepler can't provide that information, but ground-based telescopes can. They will look for tiny wobbles in the star, caused by the gravity of the planet. Such observations are contemplated for the middle of 2012. It's my impression that spectroscopic work on the atmosphere of a planet 600 light years distant may still be beyond our current capabilities. If someone knows something to the contrary, I'd be interested to hear it. If the planet proves to be of the terrestrial sort, with a solid surface, rather than a smaller version of Neptune, it's not unreasonable to think that it might have an atmosphere similar to Earth's. | |
| ID: 1176111 · | |
|
the planet is estimated to have a 290 day year so hopefully we can learn more as time goes on | |
| ID: 1176139 · | |
the planet is estimated to have a 290 day year so hopefully we can learn more as time goes on We will have to find a name for this planet, does Kepler sound OK ? or would it require something more imaginative? ____________ The Kite Fliers -------------------- Kite fliers: An imaginary club of solo members, those who don't yet belong to a formal team so "fly their own kites" - as the saying goes. | |
| ID: 1176142 · | |
or would it require something more imaginative? Perhaps we should call it what the inhabitants do .... if there are any of course. Otherwise any arbitrary name we may give it is merely incongruous. | |
| ID: 1176345 · | |
or would it require something more imaginative? Bit strange if we found that it was inhabited and they also call their planet "Earth"? ____________ The Kite Fliers -------------------- Kite fliers: An imaginary club of solo members, those who don't yet belong to a formal team so "fly their own kites" - as the saying goes. | |
| ID: 1176370 · | |
|
I'd be much more excited if they had located planets around a star say 5 to 10 LY away. At 600 LY it's like holding a lolly pop just outside the reach of a baby. | |
| ID: 1176387 · | |
|
Kepler-22b: At 2.4 times Earth's radius, and if of similar composition, wouldn't that put it's surface gravity at about 7 or 8 G? | |
| ID: 1176388 · | |
|
1.6G I thought. | |
| ID: 1176596 · | |
|
Kepler-22b does sound like an interesting find. | |
| ID: 1176638 · | |
|
UPDATE: Is the New planet Kepler 22b discovered by NASA super earth? | |
| ID: 1177156 · | |
Dr. Jill Tarter of the SETI Institute announced that Kepler 22b and other promising planets discovered by the Kepler Project will soon be monitored for intelligent radio signals at the newly reopened Allen Telescope Array. IF this planet is inhabited, and *if* its inhabitants had the ability and inclination to send a strong radio beam our way 600 years ago, we may not have to wait too long for confirmation of life on the planet. They don't even have to be sending it to us. Just in our general direction. Would be nice if they were sending constant signals much like TV and radio on earth do here. But if we don't find those transmissions, that doesn't mean there are no human like beings on the planet, they just might not yet have the capabilities to send such signals. There was a time when we had no clue what radio even was much less signals from space. ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1177157 · | |
ability and inclination to send a strong radio beam our way 600 years ago Presumably then it would take another 600 years for us to reply, then another 600 for a response back from them to confirm it wasn't a once off. Rather impractical to wait 1200 years for definite proof .... | |
| ID: 1177223 · | |
|
The general idea seems to be that the original signal should persist long enough to be independently verified, and contain enough information to establish that it came from an extraterrestrial civilization. A simple 'one shot' signal, such as they sent into space from Arecibo years ago, is less than adequate. An exception to this could a beamed signal that sweeps by fairly rapidly, but contains enough information to direct us to another frequency where a continuous, omnidirectional signal could be found. We might have to 'sharpen our ears' to get this message, by building larger antennas. | |
| ID: 1177261 · | |
|
Let me see it would take 73000 years to nearest star which is about 4.5 ly away. This star is over 300 lightyears away. A mear six and half million years one way. A fuel tank as big as the earth is needed and lots of patient crew members. Just think if the atmosphere isnt fit for habitation. Maybe too high a concentration of oxygen just as toxic as any other gas in hevey concentration. | |
| ID: 1177954 · | |
Let me see it would take 73000 years to nearest star which is about 4.5 ly away. This star is over 300 lightyears away. A mear six and half million years one way. A fuel tank as big as the earth is needed and lots of patient crew members. Just think if the atmosphere isnt fit for habitation. Maybe too high a concentration of oxygen just as toxic as any other gas in hevey concentration. Where did you get these numbers from? | |
| ID: 1178406 · | |
|
If, with current technology a ship could be built to achieve an average speed of 100,000 mph I calculate it would take 30,132 years to go 4.5 ly. | |
| ID: 1178424 · | |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : Kepler-22b: The new Earth?
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |