They haven't landed yet! |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : They haven't landed yet!
1 · 2 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
From https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#%21/response/searching-et-no-evidence-yet, yes, it's official: Official White House Response to formally acknowledge an extraterrestrial presence engaging the human race - Disclosure. and 1 other petition. ____________ Jord - BOINC FAQ Service - BOINC User Wiki Real is just a matter of perception. | |
| ID: 1169031 · | |
|
Interesting Jord, | |
| ID: 1169047 · | |
Interesting Jord, I agree completely! Steve ____________ Warning, addicted to SETI crunching! Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group. GPUUG Website | |
| ID: 1169048 · | |
Many have also noted, however, that the odds of us making contact with any of them—especially any intelligent ones—are extremely small, given the distances involved. ummmm, what was the other Option?? Making contact with UNintelligent aliens!! I'm sorry, But I'll need something more Authoritative than a statement from anyone on the WH Payroll before I believe it, Hook, Line and Sinker... Lt | |
| ID: 1169052 · | |
|
The statement is accurate. | |
| ID: 1169385 · | |
|
I have to agree. | |
| ID: 1169591 · | |
|
What? No conspiracy? I think the statement is honest and concise. | |
| ID: 1169981 · | |
|
| |
| ID: 1170281 · | |
|
Well I have to agree...at least about 80%. I still think they know a lot more about the possibility or existence of another species, intelligent or not, than what they are telling us. NASA has at least 2 cards left to play: 1) Announce they have found life, microbial or mammal, on another planet (most likely place is one of several moons in our own solar system) or 2) Announce they have found proof of an intelligent alien species that existed in the past or present and have made or intend to make contact with said species (NASA has that second card to play assuming they discover a signal or etc. before any other agency or citizen etc.). Once those cards are played the only real thing left is getting to those places if not in our own backyard and frankly light speed or getting anything near it is not as fascinating as talking to another alien. So once one of those two things happen, then what...you know? So for them its like 'meh.' If you ask me they have a lot of hard evidence to say there may very well mammal life in oceans under the ice surfaces of at least one of Jupiter's and Saturn's moons, but are stalling announcing it. I always asked the question: Why have they paid much less attention to these moons? Why haven't they really planned on sending probes or rovers or etc. to these things? Well i pretty much answered those questions... | |
| ID: 1170589 · | |
|
As much as I would like to learn of alien beings or life somewhere besides earth I think there is no reason to believe the US government or any other for that matter has proof positive of such matters. | |
| ID: 1170676 · | |
As much as I would like to learn of alien beings or life somewhere besides earth I think there is no reason to believe the US government or any other for that matter has proof positive of such matters. I would broadly agree. But I am sure that every major world power also has sightinga and other anomolies that just cannot be explained by todays knowlege. I reckon they are 99.9% sure there is no ET, but are privately keeping their options open on the 0.1%. | |
| ID: 1170714 · | |
|
Where would they come from and how would they get here ?? | |
| ID: 1170730 · | |
Where would they come from and how would they get here ?? Ah, well that is the enigma isn't it :-) If they are there, and if they did, or do come, where from indeed? We either have a secret planet in the solar system not yet discovered, or they have faster than light drives from the nearest stars. I doubt if you or I will know in our lifetimes .... | |
| ID: 1170735 · | |
Where would they come from and how would they get here ?? Thats where your wrong Chris, You haven't lost faith in the things i have said here in the last few months, have you? Even if its just a slim possibility that i have been speaking the truth about my investigation, leave the possibility open. Yes, its possible that old Johnney Guinness here was telling you all a pack of lies. But maybe i really do have something. My research continues, i'm now in the 11th month of my research. You will all see and hear great things in the next few years, i promise you! John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1170895 · | |
Thats where your wrong Chris, You haven't lost faith in the things i have said here in the last few months, have you? Nothing to do with losing faith Johnney. I have always been open to hear your theories, and in time the things you say you have discovered. You will all see and hear great things in the next few years, i promise you! Well, earlier this year you did indicate that the future publication of these findings of yours might be measured in months. Now you are saying in a few years time? This is not to decry your work, but I and others had thought this information to be rather more imminent than that. | |
| ID: 1170951 · | |
Thats where your wrong Chris, You haven't lost faith in the things i have said here in the last few months, have you? Chris, I made the first major break-through on December 29th 2010. I didn't say anything to anyone until roughly around April this year when i first started chatting about it on these SETI science forums. But the one thing i said all along Chris was that i did not know how long it was going to take to decode the information i had. I need to be sure, 100% sure, scientifically sure before i go public. My initial time estimate was somewhere between a few weeks, to anything up to a year. This is November and i'm 10 months into decoding the information. Now at this stage i can give you a more accurate time scale. Initially i thought i could decode the information much faster. But 10 months into the decoding, i now know its going to take more time to be 100% sure about what i have. At this stage, i have built up a massive bank of data and information that will assist me in decoding the information i have. The single biggest impediment to progress at the moment is the speed of my own personal ability to learn very advanced degree level science. I have to learn nuclear physics, chemical engineering, genetic engineering and a pile of other very difficult scientific topics. Thats not easy Chris, its like going to collage and doing 3 separate degree courses all at the one time. So even when i have parts of the information decoded, i still have to hold off until i have sufficient scientific evidence built up to convince even the most hardened skeptics like Ozzfan. Once i go public, there will be a thousand people just like Ozzfan ready and waiting to knock my theory and evidence on the head. So i need to be ready for them, and have the scientific answers to back-up my evidence. My evidence needs to be 100% concrete scientific evidence, otherwise its not worth publishing. Its all or nothing! So my current estimate is sometime near the end of next year, the end of 2012 for a publication. Quality science takes time! John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1171079 · | |
|
I can hardly wait. Johnny, you better have it ready before Dec. 21, 2012 or else there won't be anybody here to tell you research to. | |
| ID: 1171358 · | |
I can hardly wait. Johnny, you better have it ready before Dec. 21, 2012 or else there won't be anybody here to tell you research to. LOL... thats a good point Taggart! John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1171392 · | |
|
What would be useful at this stage would be a precis or synopsis. The sort of thing that an author would send to a publisher seeking an advance towards a final manuscript. Enough substance to whet the appetite so to speak ..... | |
| ID: 1171465 · | |
What would be useful at this stage would be a precis or synopsis. The sort of thing that an author would send to a publisher seeking an advance towards a final manuscript. Enough substance to whet the appetite so to speak ..... You got that Chris. For a month or two i chatted here about what i'm doing. Some people were interested, some people were not. So you know exactly what i'm doing, the work still continues. I got the feedback i needed so now i'm just quietly working away in the background. No point in annoying people here if they are not interested. I could post updates but i would just get abused for not revealing the complete set of scientific evidence. And thats not going to happen until i'm 100% ready. John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1171517 · | |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : They haven't landed yet!
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |