as the heading implies ....

---

The kitties would like a bit more kibble in the bowls too!

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

The kitties would like a bit more kibble in the bowls too!

No chance!

I installed a new video card yesterday afternoon.

The kitties would like a bit more kibble in the bowls too!

No chance!

I installed a new video card yesterday afternoon.

I brought 7 more machines online yesterday as well. Mostly all dual socket Xeons. :/

---

SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[

The kitties would like a bit more kibble in the bowls too!

No chance!

I installed a new video card yesterday afternoon.

I brought 7 more machines online yesterday as well. Mostly all dual socket Xeons. :/

We're doomed.

I just checked, and I have 1 more task than the previous limit. That hadn't happened before, so I am guessing the limits have been increased. With 6 cores, and 2 GPU's, my limit was 1100 tasks. Now I have 1101 tasks.

Steve

---

Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

I think you might just have a ghost Steve. I'm still limited to 50/400...

---

I think you might just have a ghost Steve. I'm still limited to 50/400...

Rats!

Steve

---

Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

I've got over 100 ghosts over my three machines...

---

I think you might just have a ghost Steve. I'm still limited to 50/400...

I think so as well. My HTPC is still limited to 302 tasks. :(

Edit: Double checking I only have 200 tasks on the box. So I do seem to have 102 ghosts that are not getting resent. At least it is 50 tasks per CPU core instead of 50 CPU tasks total now.

---

SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[

210 ghosts on this machine.

---

Kevin

I think you might just have a ghost Steve. I'm still limited to 50/400...

Rats!

Steve

I have 336 MB and 59 AP ready to run on my single GPU machine.

I have 761 MB ready to run on my double GPU machine. Nice part here is that only one of the cards actually runs SETI.

---

Fortunately I have been able to keep close to my limits lately, but I really wish I could build a cache. 400 wu per GPU is only 1 days worth. I have a few days of CPU work, including AP units, but my GPU's are quite the work hogs.

Steve

---

Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

I just checked, and I have 1 more task than the previous limit. That hadn't happened before, so I am guessing the limits have been increased. With 6 cores, and 2 GPU's, my limit was 1100 tasks. Now I have 1101 tasks.

Steve

Kind sir, may I please borrow about 100 GPU tasks for one of my computers?

Please send them in an unmarked envelope.

I have this "new build" (newly built from old parts) that's capable of 15k+/day and I keep an In Progress list in the single digits and it's only turning-in 3k/day because it's starving for work.

I know it'll iron itself out in time, so I'm not worried. I even approve of the reason you don't overwhelm a new system with work.

Still, it's hurting my feelings.

i think when the new generation of graphic cards arrive we will need a new limits or 10 day cache will be a lot lower than in the real world.

---

Fortunately I have been able to keep close to my limits lately, but I really wish I could build a cache. 400 wu per GPU is only 1 days worth. I have a few days of CPU work, including AP units, but my GPU's are quite the work hogs.

Steve

Haven't checked this, had about 20 AstroPulse WUs, done in 2 to 5 hours,
2 per (ATI 5870) GPU, but I noticed too often 1 is running on 0.5 GPU, if there's
not enough work, so I better set this to 1 per GPU.

In a previous post, in this thread, you said, I'm using 6 cores (CPU) and 4 on
GPUs, when you use HyperThreading, are you experiencing too long
computation times, doubled or another reason, keeping you from using HTT?

I get the best times with HTT on, only a real (SSSE3x) Floating Point
Benchmark, I can see, the I7-2600, is faster, whithout HTT.
But the i7-2600, ups the frequency, from 3.4 to 3.8GHz., if 1 or 2 cores are used, whitout HTT. (Also with HTT on, but slightly lower frequencies).

I'd like more AstroPulse work.... And, too often, the slowest host gets them.

---

My Badger is still hungry. More popcorn please!!

And yes, they seem to have a changed formula for restrictions at the moment..
Badger tops out around 1300(slightly more, but close.

That is with 16 "cores", and 2(1 double) GPU's.

---

Janice

Haven't checked this, had about 20 AstroPulse WUs, done in 2 to 5 hours,
2 per (ATI 5870) GPU, but I noticed too often 1 is running on 0.5 GPU, if there's
not enough work, so I better set this to 1 per GPU.

In a previous post, in this thread, you said, I'm using 6 cores (CPU) and 4 on
GPUs, when you use HyperThreading, are you experiencing too long
computation times, doubled or another reason, keeping you from using HTT?

I get the best times with HTT on, only a real (SSSE3x) Floating Point
Benchmark, I can see, the I7-2600, is faster, whithout HTT.
But the i7-2600, ups the frequency, from 3.4 to 3.8GHz., if 1 or 2 cores are used, whitout HTT. (Also with HTT on, but slightly lower frequencies).

I'd like more AstroPulse work.... And, too often, the slowest host gets them.

For my particular rig, just cruching Seti, I get jagged GPU output when using hyperthreading, and hence reduced output with hyperthreading on. With hyperthreading off, the GPU output is very smooth, and loaded at 98-99%. Once I get back around 80,000 RAC, I will experiment with hyperthreading again.

On Einstein it is a different story. Hyperthreading works very well there, as the project is using different strengths than Seti.

My CPU speed is at 4.2 GHz, and my GPU's are running at 871 MHz

Your mileage may vary.

Steve

---

Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

The kitties would like a bit more kibble in the bowls too!

Yeah yeah, and I would like One of these

There's plenty of things we'd "like" to have Mark :-)

True, but more kibble in the kitty bowls is achievable.....LOL.
Release the Kraken.

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

The kitties would like a bit more kibble in the bowls too!

Yeah yeah, and I would like One of these

There's plenty of things we'd "like" to have Mark :-)

True, but more kibble in the kitty bowls is achievable.....LOL.
Release the Kraken.

Oh no, he said "Release the Kraken". If the Cricket Graph takes a dive soon, at least we know who to blame....

The Kraken. Not the d..d..d..d......little yellow one who's name shall not be spoken.

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster