Seti recognizes Tibet as part of China, what do you think? |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : Seti recognizes Tibet as part of China, what do you think?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Well, the title pretty much sums up my question, but I'll elaborate a little here... | |
| ID: 1156692 · | |
|
China set out to ruthlessly destroy everything of Tibetan culture. The Tibetan people are being badly overrun and left as an impoverished underclass. | |
| ID: 1156705 · | |
|
After reviewing my post I realize that my communication leaves room for unintentional harm. I do not mean to say that the Seti Project should recognize Tibet as an independent nation. I am but a cruncher - one of many. I have nothing to do with what the Project does/decides. Forgive me if any of my comments came off as "They should do this or that", that was not my intent, and I apologize in advance to whomever my original post may possibly offend. My curiosity simply gave birth to the desire to pose the question to my fellow crunchers as to their opinions on Tibet as an independent nation, and *not* whether the Seti Project should or should not recognize it as such. | |
| ID: 1156714 · | |
|
Seti@Home is initiated and dominated with americans. But today americans owe to china close to 2 trillion dollars. In the last decade all those proud american media almost stopped of broadcasting about chinese ethnic clensing of tibetans and shinjan-uighurs. | |
| ID: 1156748 · | |
|
I don't think that we should see China as Reds under the bed quite just yet, but their inexorable advance is becoming at least to me, a tad worrying. | |
| ID: 1156788 · | |
|
If western hemisphere truly that self proclaiming leading civilization what ever democracy practitioner etc things they must not cooperate with modern day mass ethnic clenser plus human rights violator. That is the ground condition. But the reality is majorly turning the other way. | |
| ID: 1156808 · | |
I don't think that we should see China as Reds under the bed quite just yet, but their inexorable advance is becoming at least to me, a tad worrying. Phew! Indeed “outrageous and disgraceful”. So the Chinese are actually 'legislating' to proscribe what the Chinese want for the Tibetan culture and beliefs! I rather like the response from the Dalai Lama. The Chinese attempt to legislate to audaciously try to control 'reincarnation'. Meanwhile, the Dalai Lama notes that he is free to emanate his good spirit. Which religion will the Chinese try to rewrite next?! Perhaps the Chinese authorities have no concept of hearts and minds? All very sad and unnecessary on many levels. All our only world? Martin ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3) | |
| ID: 1156832 · | |
|
It's the same old thing. One country kicking out another. It's been going on since Man plagued this planet. Not all Man of course. I don't think Tibet declared war on any other country or did any kicking out. Unless Tibet can kick China out it's going to have to rely on appealing to the world. | |
| ID: 1156987 · | |
|
The sad about Tibet, is that this situation will be maintained for a very long time. China is now one of the fast growing economies in the world, Europe and US are dependent on their cheap labour. | |
| ID: 1157031 · | |
Tibet is the same, they all receive the Dalai Lama and smile to him and agree about the human rights violations that are occurring in Tibet, but on the other hand they just don’t take an official position against china, because Tibet is not interesting either economically or strategically to Europe or the US. Dr Imaginario: I disagree with the assumption that the US in not getting involved because Tibet has nothing to offer (China has found many natural resources that they are now in the process of exploiting from the mountains of Tibet). Human rights violations are enough for the US to get involved, it's the sheer fact of taking a stand against China that muddles any thoughts about doing the right thing. ____________ | |
| ID: 1157212 · | |
Seti@Home is initiated and dominated with americans. But today americans owe to china close to 2 trillion dollars. In the last decade all those proud american media almost stopped of broadcasting about chinese ethnic clensing of tibetans and shinjan-uighurs. With the notable exceptions of the BBC in the UK and to a lesser degree NPR in the US, most media comment is the West is not state sponsored. There have been issues in the past establishing the veracity of news from communist nations, and unfortunately China's well known internet monitoring continues to hamper the free flow of information. Having said that, the July 2009 Ürümqi riots and some of the events that transpired later in that year were covered by media in the West (e.g. this article in the New York Times). ____________ I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... | |
| ID: 1157293 · | |
Message boards : Politics : Seti recognizes Tibet as part of China, what do you think?
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |