NASA to Announce Kepler Discovery |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : NASA to Announce Kepler Discovery
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
NASA to Announce Kepler Discovery at Media Briefing | |
| ID: 1152199 · | |
|
They announced the discovery of a planet orbiting 2 stars. Kepler16B. The LucasFilm person was invited because the Star Wars film had shown a similar 3-body system. But they are cold stars, smaller than the Sun. | |
| ID: 1152545 · | |
|
I watched it...well the first few minutes of it. I then realized how disappointed I was in the entire thing. I guess this has to be expected of NASA as of lately though. I mean the discovery is cool, but the Lucas Arts/films guy or whoever seemed to be there just so they could use the Star Wars names and etc. Cool discovery, but one of NASA's worst press conferences on the books. | |
| ID: 1152626 · | |
|
NASA Discovers Tatooine-Like Planet | |
| ID: 1152672 · | |
I watched it...well the first few minutes of it. I then realized how disappointed I was in the entire thing. I guess this has to be expected of NASA as of lately though. I mean the discovery is cool, but the Lucas Arts/films guy or whoever seemed to be there just so they could use the Star Wars names and etc. Cool discovery, but one of NASA's worst press conferences on the books. It is a cool discovery though Jason! I suppose we all get excited when NASA hold press conferences and say they have some "BIG" announcement about Exoplanets. Really, we're all kinda hoping that some day NASA will tell us the big one......That they found and confirmed life somewhere else. Then its a let-down if they don't announce that. What we are confirming with the Kepler telescope is that other solar systems are similar to our own, and sometimes other solar systems will have strange and wonderful stuff that we don't have. It is very cool to imagine two Sun's crossing the sky every day. What a wonderful thought......and now we know that it really does happen in other places! John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1152673 · | |
|
I've read that Kepler has problems in finding planets by the eclipsing method since stars are often more variable than our Sun and its takes a longer time of observation to determine if the dimming of a given star is due to an orbiting planet.But the Kepler people are really cool. | |
| ID: 1152678 · | |
|
The question is ; | |
| ID: 1152688 · | |
|
I don't know.What I know is that the First Kepler Science Conference will be held in December 2011. Maybe this will answer your questions. | |
| ID: 1152692 · | |
The question is ; Yes, Earth-size planets can be detected, and the orbital period coupled with the type of star allow determining whether it's in the habitable zone. Note that it takes three transits to be reasonably sure of the orbital period, IOW three years for a planet very like Earth. The "nearly circular" question could be answered if the times when the planet goes behind the sun provides enough drop in luminosity to detect, unlikely for an Earth-size planet. Joe | |
| ID: 1152790 · | |
I watched it...well the first few minutes of it. I then realized how disappointed I was in the entire thing. I guess this has to be expected of NASA as of lately though. I mean the discovery is cool, but the Lucas Arts/films guy or whoever seemed to be there just so they could use the Star Wars names and etc. Cool discovery, but one of NASA's worst press conferences on the books. I guess that's true and will agree to an extent because when they do announce life on other planets, what could really trump that? But It just seems they hype it up too much all the time. It is a cool discovery. But I don't like the idea of a scientific discovery being made into a commercial. This is awesome stuff we are dealing with and NASA treats it like a movie...I am surprised they don't do a "this press conference brought to you by..." ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1152857 · | |
|
Joe, Thank you for the reply. I am eager to see more results, one way or the other. It would be great to send a probe that would report back in my lifetime if we find a promising target near in. | |
| ID: 1152878 · | |
Behind or in front of? Cannot understand. Tullio ____________ | |
| ID: 1153008 · | |
As a planet crosses in front of its star, there's a drop in brightness because the planet blocks some of the star's light output. But as a planet goes behind the star, there's also a much smaller drop in brightness because the light reflected from the planet is blocked by the star. That effect has been seen for some of the very large planets in close orbit around a star, and if the orbit is nearly circular the spacing of those lesser drops is halfway between the larger drops. Joe | |
| ID: 1153024 · | |
|
Any probe we could send now would not be able to report back for several hundreds of years. | |
| ID: 1153493 · | |
|
Planets could form. Jupiter would be a sun if it were somewhat bigger. The orbits might be erratic or unstable and therefore not conducive to life formation. | |
| ID: 1153529 · | |
Joe, Thank you for the reply. I am eager to see more results, one way or the other. It would be great to send a probe that would report back in my lifetime if we find a promising target near in. I think if we want to find definitive life on other planets/moons other than earth, we need to send probes to the likes of Jupiter's moon Europa, Saturn's Enceladus and Titan...any of these three are the best candidates for bacterial life or even mammals. If Europa or Enceladus have liquid water under their surfaces, there could be an entire ecosystem on these moons. We already know Cassini discovered "organic" material as well as water spewing from geysers on Enceladus, so that moon would be my first choice. As much as I love Mars and hope we find something big there, NASA has several other better candidates for mammal life right under their noses, but avoid landing on these moons. If life is what they are seeking, they are looking in the wrong places so to speak. ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1153624 · | |
|
Two NASA space telescopes have helped solve some of the most enduring mysteries of the first documented report of star explosion — an ancient supernova spotted nearly 2,000 years ago, scientists say. | |
| ID: 1165216 · | |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : NASA to Announce Kepler Discovery
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |