Message boards :
Number crunching :
Not complaining but...........
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Geek@Play Send message Joined: 31 Jul 01 Posts: 2467 Credit: 86,146,931 RAC: 0 |
Our wonderful "credit new" system at work....... http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=812011258 Boinc....Boinc....Boinc....Boinc.... |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
Our wonderful "credit new" system at work....... LOL.... I should have such fine wingmen. "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
Space Cowboy Send message Joined: 24 Apr 00 Posts: 43 Credit: 1,730,621 RAC: 0 |
Our wonderful "credit new" system at work....... Any more of these floating around - could do with a boost to my RAC |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
|
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Well....glory be! I'll see your task 808370172 and raise you task 809970830 :) SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
.clair. Send message Joined: 4 Nov 04 Posts: 1300 Credit: 55,390,408 RAC: 69 |
Some of those process times make me want to plug in my K6-2 550 again, Just for fun :¬) Though it is overclocked to 605Mhz and runs MMX optimized app`s . . . |
Brkovip Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 274 Credit: 144,414,367 RAC: 0 |
I think if you can't complete a single task within 30 days you shouldn't be sent those tasks. If that means you have to retire your machine then so be it. |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
Some of those process times make me want to plug in my K6-2 550 again, I really wish I could afford the electricity to turn on my museum computers. I would love to run SETI on my old K6-II 550 and K5-3 450, as well as my many other systems! :-) |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
I think if you can't complete a single task within 30 days you shouldn't be sent those tasks. If that means you have to retire your machine then so be it. I'm curious what caused that comment. The AP task noted in the first post took 1.7 days on the slower host. The K6 belonging to clive G1FYE had an average turnaround of 7.1 days when it was active. Joe |
AI4FR Send message Joined: 13 Apr 11 Posts: 57 Credit: 23,590,991 RAC: 0 |
|
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22199 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
There can be legitimate reasons why a task, or a group of tasks is not completed in a given deadline. For example one of my older crunchers died while I was away from it. It was a couple of weeks before was in back at its side, by which time it had finished reciting the dead parrot sketch, and wasn't even twitching, its hard drive totally beyond redemption. And so a pile of tasks of unknown size were abandoned to the pit of no results possible. Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.