latest greatest Telescope for the low low price

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : latest greatest Telescope for the low low price

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9529
Credit: 44,436,740
RAC: 24
Burma
Message 1144183 - Posted: 23 Aug 2011, 3:45:53 UTC

JWST price tag now put at over $8bn

Nasa says it will now cost $8.7bn to launch the James Webb Space Telescope in 2018 and operate it for five years.

The assessment - some $2bn higher than previous estimates - has emerged from documents sent to the US Congress.

James Webb is regarded as the successor to Hubble and will carry technologies capable of detecting the light from the first stars to shine in the Universe.

That actually seems reasonable to me. At the cost of 1 month of a war in Afghanistan of Iraq we can have the latest greatest space telescope. Now if the penny pinchers would unclench their cheeks it can be done. Seriously, unless the $8 billions is connected to killing people we hear screams of how expensive it is. $8 billion is the cost of 8 B2 bombers. I call it a deal if they just stop flying 8 B2's
In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 1144183 · Report as offensive
Profile Make Science GREAT Again. STOP dA FAKE Science of Political Bias; Agendas; Hoaxs; Scams; Schemes of Money Granting. All To Perpetuate An Indocrination of FAKE Science fostering FAKE Policies Thieving from TaxPayers.
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 02
Posts: 3214
Credit: 4,935,772
RAC: 6,802
Russia
Message 1144202 - Posted: 23 Aug 2011, 4:48:06 UTC

$8 billion is the cost of 8 B2 bombers. I call it a deal if they just stop flying 8 B2's

If The B2s did not exist, The 8 Billion would not exist.

And if The 8 Billion did exist, there would be 1000s of competing interests for it.

Why would the 8 Billion be used for a telescope?

And if The 8 Billion was used for a Telescope, people would be saying, "if These Expensive Telescopes Didn't Exist we could buy......".

Yep, that $3000 toilet seat-if it did not exist-could feed 10 People in Appalachia for a month(substitute some African Country if you like and get 1000 people).

Fly me To The Moon, let us Dance Among The Stars. Let's see what Life is Like on Jupiter and Mars. In Other Words-Kiss Me Baby. In Other Words-Hold my hand.

LaDaDaDaDaDa La La Lalalalala.

I am Null and Void and a Darwin Barnacle

ID: 1144202 · Report as offensive
Profile Robert Waite
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Oct 07
Posts: 2276
Credit: 8,431,811
RAC: 5,035
Canada
Message 1144213 - Posted: 23 Aug 2011, 5:46:05 UTC - in response to Message 1144202.  



If The B2s did not exist, The 8 Billion would not exist.



I'm always forced to laugh at this type of logic. It's as if the writer believes these planes drop gold bars or endless supplies of food instead of death.





I do not fight fascists because I think I can win.
I fight them because they are fascists.
Chris Hedges

A riot is the language of the unheard. -Martin Luther King, Jr.
ID: 1144213 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3253
Credit: 1,297,254
RAC: 351
United States
Message 1144258 - Posted: 23 Aug 2011, 11:06:08 UTC - in response to Message 1144213.  

I would like to bid on that job
ID: 1144258 · Report as offensive
Profile Chris SCrowdfunding Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 38550
Credit: 23,905,812
RAC: 38,992
United Kingdom
Message 1144263 - Posted: 23 Aug 2011, 11:23:51 UTC

As far as I can see, the Hubble space telescope is still doing a fantastic job, although of course a more powerfull successor would be nice.

Why didn't they spend the 8 billion keeping the Shuttles flying and build an International Moon Base ???
ID: 1144263 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9529
Credit: 44,436,740
RAC: 24
Burma
Message 1144587 - Posted: 24 Aug 2011, 15:29:57 UTC - in response to Message 1144263.  

bureaucratic bs that keeps things from being accomplished. Small minded congressmen that can't see the money to be made for all the lobbyists tossing more money their way
In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 1144587 · Report as offensive
Profile Davoud

Send message
Joined: 10 Oct 11
Posts: 13
Credit: 208,301
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1161990 - Posted: 13 Oct 2011, 21:41:27 UTC

Hmm, I thought that telescope would be up in the air by 2014. What happend? :)
ID: 1161990 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary CharpentierCrowdfunding Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 19216
Credit: 22,927,930
RAC: 23,280
United States
Message 1162010 - Posted: 13 Oct 2011, 23:08:09 UTC - in response to Message 1161990.  

Hmm, I thought that telescope would be up in the air by 2014. What happend? :)

Politics in the USA.

ID: 1162010 · Report as offensive
Profile Davoud

Send message
Joined: 10 Oct 11
Posts: 13
Credit: 208,301
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1162034 - Posted: 13 Oct 2011, 23:45:29 UTC - in response to Message 1162010.  
Last modified: 13 Oct 2011, 23:45:44 UTC

Hmm, I thought that telescope would be up in the air by 2014. What happend? :)

Politics in the USA.


Thats shame beyond words. I was so looking forward to seeing pictures taken by the telescope. Now I have to wait 4! more years! :/

Well hopefully Chinas engagement to space science will fuel the west's fire for it.
ID: 1162034 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 5889
Credit: 1,205,803
RAC: 1,325
Italy
Message 1162049 - Posted: 14 Oct 2011, 0:50:00 UTC

It's a very advanced telescope, to be put in high orbit, not serviceable by any manned mission. It must work with no error.So the testing is very important, not to repeat the story of Hubble which went to orbit with a flawed optical system.
Tullio

ID: 1162049 · Report as offensive
Profile Orgil

Send message
Joined: 3 Aug 05
Posts: 979
Credit: 103,527
RAC: 0
Mongolia
Message 1162144 - Posted: 14 Oct 2011, 9:41:24 UTC
Last modified: 14 Oct 2011, 9:59:13 UTC

I guess Lockheed Martin corp is building that or at least supplying majority parts of that next human brain marvel. The thing is those defense contractors all the time extending deadlines plus worstly add the cost. For the majorly short public budget and bottomless traditional budget swallower LM and others I cannot imagine where the public fate heads.
Mandtugai!
ID: 1162144 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : latest greatest Telescope for the low low price


 
©2017 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.