Message boards :
SETI@home Science :
'What-if' an advanced ET were to notice Earth?...
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 20289 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 |
A group in NASA have been brain-stormin' over how an intelligent ET encounter might develop: Aliens may destroy humanity to protect other civilisations, say scientists Rising greenhouse emissions may tip off aliens that we are a rapidly expanding threat, warns a report for Nasa It may not rank as the most compelling reason to curb greenhouse gases, but reducing our emissions might just save humanity from a pre-emptive alien attack, scientists claim. Watching from afar, extraterrestrial beings might view changes in Earth's atmosphere as symptomatic of a civilisation growing out of control – and take drastic action to keep us from becoming a more serious threat, the researchers explain. This highly speculative scenario is one of several described by scientists at Nasa and Pennsylvania State University that, while considered unlikely, they say could play out were humans and alien life to make contact at some point in the future. ... Curious stuff!... But plausible? Keep searchin', Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
musicplayer Send message Joined: 17 May 10 Posts: 2430 Credit: 926,046 RAC: 0 |
Yes. Five or so people feeding the download server with new tasks for us to process and me to post rubbish stuff back in return. Well. The problem earlier posted here regarding the problem I had regarding the presence of triplets in the graphics of opened windows appear to have been mostly solved. From my account, I chose "Preferences for this project" (Seti@home Preferences) from the box or paragraph labeled Preferences. From there I edited the Preferences. Rather than the pre-set "Seti@home classic" in the pull-down menu "Graphics preferences", I chose "Minimalist". I also tried out "Panels", but "Minimalist" is definitely the better one of the two. Without altering or changing the other parameters available to me there, I also tried out "Custom". As of now, I am a little uncertain regarding this choice. I have not yet tried going back to "Seti@home Classic", but otherwise I really do not remember if this choice ran as "Minimalist", "Panels" or something else. Probably I did not have any triplets running in my tasks at that moment and therefore did not get that annoying blue screen error. In any case, the problem appears to have been solved for now when choosing either "Minimalist" or "Panels", at least. |
musicplayer Send message Joined: 17 May 10 Posts: 2430 Credit: 926,046 RAC: 0 |
"nr","date","result_name","cpu","start_ra","start_dec","end_ra","end_dec", "angle_range","time_recorded","bs_score","bs_power","spike_count","bg_score", "bg_power","bg_chisq","gaussian_count","bp_score","bp_power","bp_period", "pulse_count","bt_score","bt_power","bt_period","triplet_count" "1","2005.11.09 17:33:02","23my04aa.20947.25280.915908.38_3_0","05:21:16","4.3732217822157", "13.611955989316","4.4088969433804","13.444092686005","0.55911518292217", "2453149.2226852","-0.086921","32.744562516381","4","4.494930", "1.8917645215988","0.42086625099182","0","0.959449","0.45254981517792", "0.0755968","0",,,,"0" In fact. I like this one. You do not. Yes. You have seen it before, you certainly have. Any other ways you might like to have it. A kiss perhaps? But why does an "intelligent" number have to be "higher" than (the) others? Certainly this one was thrown away. Seti@home has still to find something / anything. Nothing as yet. I rather watch some UFO movies on Youtube for the rest of the evening. |
Lint trap Send message Joined: 30 May 03 Posts: 871 Credit: 28,092,319 RAC: 0 |
So, the Sci-Fi movie "Skyline" is a possible scenario? That's scary. As far as detecting ET, I think we might be looking in the wrong place. I believe ET could be broadcasting in the noise. Why? The advanced ET's don't want to be bothered with rabble that are still living in caves and digging in the dirt, from their point of view. They've all been where we are now, searching in the quiet band and finding nothing. As time passed, their science and knowledge flourished until they discovered the 'key'. A relationship, a ratio, the unification theory, something that gave them the ability to distinguish order from the chaos of background noise. The noise isn't all just noise. We're not there, yet. Hey, this was supposed to be Sci-Fi, right?? :) Lt |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
I think it is just as plausible that if ET were to notice our existence they would make a log entry, verify that we can barely get ourselves into orbit, notice we are on the brink of our own demise and make a note to check back later. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
We have well-known signal processing techniques that will bring a signal up out of the noise. Noise is random but follows a well known Gaussian curve. When a signal is auto correlated or cross correlated it will jump up out of the Noise. Noise will appear on any band. Thermal noise in the receiver as well as background radiation. |
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 20289 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 |
I think it is just as plausible that if ET were to notice our existence they would make a log entry, verify that we can barely get ourselves into orbit, notice we are on the brink of our own demise and make a note to check back later. OK, I think that fits Douglas Adams' summary of "Mostly harmless". (See also: the guide) Keep searchin', Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
musicplayer Send message Joined: 17 May 10 Posts: 2430 Credit: 926,046 RAC: 0 |
When do you know a gaussian is "intelligent" in nature? Is it only the numbers in it (power, fit and score) - or should it be the carrier of information (meaning a possible message)? Example from my logs (intentionally not the highest score I have): "nr","date","result_name","cpu","start_ra","start_dec","end_ra","end_dec", "angle_range","time_recorded","bs_score","bs_power","spike_count","bg_score", "bg_power","bg_chisq","gaussian_count","bp_score","bp_power","bp_period", "pulse_count","bt_score","bt_power","bt_period","triplet_count" "437","2008.07.04 04:00:49","06mr08ai.27497.5798.7.8.105_0_0","05:26:08","8.2951838591858", "29.389450848964","8.3250610886358","29.389465778551","0.39048229654371", "2454532.5720297","-0.274240","21.272566387096","1","1.799584","-1","-1","0", "0.973752","7.1012926101685","3.4078719615936","4",,,,"0" "494","2008.09.09 06:06:04","14au08ad.3459.4162.11.8.216_0_0","05:31:39","1.9137821662778", "7.4828898535863","1.9436682616439","7.4828918762916","0.44447368909481", "2454692.8674851",,,"6","4.614378","-1.#IND","-1.#IND","0","0.970055", "1.5307371616364","0.34897920489311","0","11.795743","11.795742988586", "2.0185089111328","1" And finally "success": "41","2007.05.16 21:24:55","11fe05aa.24379.13488.59646.3.71_4_0","06:44:12","6.9473398369349", "20.950847567101","6.9766895673976","20.944727513729","0.42131509130686", "2453413.5506943","-0.224609","23.847964298289","0","3.746632", "2.0965366363525","1.3347446918488","1","0.978729","9.1351528167725", "5.4525952339172","0",,,,"0" In the first example you may be able to see that the gaussian score is here 1.799584, but gaussian count is 0. Also there is no power and fit (both numbers are -1, respectively). In the second example, gaussian score is thought to be 4.614378, but also here power and fit only lists as -1.#IND, respectively. Because you think it is an error (or maybe perhaps the opposite - "intelligent")? Regardless of whether gaussian count is 0 or not, you need a corresponding gaussian curve for a given gaussian score. But none of these three examples make it to the list of Seti@home candidates. Should I make a check of my logs and try to find out whether gaussian count is 30 at some place. In fact, I can not remember exactly that. Would an intelligent signal be gaussian only (or something else -the rest does not count)? Maybe I am making to much out of the gaussian score and forgetting the rest? |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
A transmission from ET does not have to be 'intelligent' in nature, or even translatable in any form. The simple recognition that such a transmission did come from some life form above the simple level of a microbe would be enough to validate the search for life outside of our planet. Don't matter if it was morse code or bursts of noise. If it was generated by anything other than spontaneous conditions........that is what we search for, my friends. "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
Lint trap Send message Joined: 30 May 03 Posts: 871 Credit: 28,092,319 RAC: 0 |
If it was generated by anything other than spontaneous conditions........that is what we search for, my friends. Certainly. A sort of "Blind Man's Bluff" in space, but not the Star Trek version. Lt |
musicplayer Send message Joined: 17 May 10 Posts: 2430 Credit: 926,046 RAC: 0 |
Like the WOW signal perhaps, which was detected as a wave and possibly being a scrambled signal. What does 'intelligence' really mean (not just thinking about an 'intelligent' signal)? Comparing with Albert Einstein. He was thought of as being intelligent. In some cases such people are regarded as geniuses as well. Some people are being discovered having such capabilities already in childhood. In others similar or other capabilities may well go undetected or unused. I do regard myself as being well educated and quite experienced in what I am doing, but I do not think I belong in the above-mentioned category of people. Anyway, perhaps I should refresh the page before (re-)posting? I noticed Lint trap's posting after re-posting myself. |
C Olival Send message Joined: 6 Sep 10 Posts: 209 Credit: 10,675 RAC: 0 |
Is the Hubble telescope, Keppler and other telescopes fit with radio receivers, if yes, could these telescopes detect a non-Earth signal? |
tullio Send message Joined: 9 Apr 04 Posts: 8797 Credit: 2,930,782 RAC: 1 |
Is the Hubble telescope, Keppler and other telescopes fit with radio receivers, if yes, could these telescopes detect a non-Earth signal? No, they are not able to receive radio waves. The Russian radiotelescope recently put in orbit might do it. Tullio |
Michael Watson Send message Joined: 7 Feb 08 Posts: 1384 Credit: 2,098,506 RAC: 5 |
The following article makes the situation with this new paper clearer. One of the authors, and not the main one, has an academic affiliation with the NASA. He did not help write the paper as part of his work there. The report was not commissioned, sanctioned or endorsed by the NASA. The news media mistakenly made it seem otherwise. http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/08/19/7419399-what-if-et-thinks-were-evil |
Lint trap Send message Joined: 30 May 03 Posts: 871 Credit: 28,092,319 RAC: 0 |
|
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
Isn't this "what if" thread supposed to be about ET detecting us? Our detection capabilities have nothing to do with an ET civilization detecting our presence on earth. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
They wouldn't notice much. Or, would they ? They might see that there is oxygen here so that there almost certainly is some form of life. They might detect coherent and radar type emissions and conclude that there were creatures, possibly similar to themselves. Since we are not broadcasting a beacon they would have to be in close in relative terms. If they could decode our Television signals they would know pretty much how we looked and what life was like here on earth. I believe they would have to be well within 100 light years and I don't believe that there is a high probability that there is other intelligent (like us ) life within this radius? Would they come to conquer us ? They would be too far away. |
Allie in Vancouver Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 3949 Credit: 1,604,668 RAC: 0 |
"What if . . ." If they have any interest in self-preservation, they'll run the other way just as fast as they possibly can. Pure mathematics is, in its way, the poetry of logical ideas. Albert Einstein |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30651 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
"What if ..." Isn't that why Nibiru is on a collision course? |
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 20289 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 |
OK, give me all your money, then start praying ..... Hasn't that American "Rapture" preacher already done that? Do you not suspect that not even the Americans would be fooled twice so soon? ;-) Keep searchin', Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.