S&P Under investigation bu US authorities |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : S&P Under investigation bu US authorities
1 · 2 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
New york Post just released the news that the S&P rating company is under investigation by the US Department of Justice. | |
| ID: 1142006 · | |
|
It's to do with the mortgage ratings. S&P and other ratings agencies reaped record profits as they bestowed their highest ratings on bundles of troubled mortgage loans, which made the mortgages appear less risky and thus more valuable. They failed to anticipate the deterioration that would come in the housing market and devastate the financial system. S&P | |
| ID: 1142009 · | |
For me this is pure and simple retaliation. Is the way of Obama's saying don't mess with me... Funny how we see two seemingly related topics and tie them together to draw a conclusion without proof. Personally, I don't see the need for Obama to retaliate against S&P by bringing them to court. If Obama were such a retaliatory President, then he would have brought slander/libel cases against the entire "birther" movement (those claiming he wasn't a natural born citizen). I also don't think Obama has that much pull to send the entire US Department of Justice after S&P. I think the more likely conclusion to draw from this is that because of the credit rating downgrade, which is just an extension of the US economy going into the crapper, fingers will be pointed in every direction so that people/corporations have someone to blame for their failures. In this case, I think the US DoJ is rightly looking into S&P's conflicting business model. One very important part that needs to come to light is that S&P has a policy of sovereignty which states that no company can have a higher credit rating than the nation they reside in, yet S&P rates 4 US companies with a AAA rating while the US sits with a AA+. In fact, they have made 109 exceptions in the past decade or less during this financial crisis - whatsupwithdat? No retaliation here. S&P are just getting themselves into hot water because they seem to make up the rules as they go along, so long as it favors themselves or seemingly the companies that have paid them out. | |
| ID: 1142060 · | |
|
I don't have proof, as I'm just expressing an opinion which of course you have the right to disagree. | |
| ID: 1142065 · | |
but all organizations have dirt under their carpets, and S&P is not an exception, the question is if someone is willing to dig enough Good point, and it certainly suggests some relation to current events (i.e. the downgrading of the US credit rating). Though I still think it has more to do with the inevitable finger pointing, and S&P's recent actions simply put them into the "hot" seat faster than anyone else. | |
| ID: 1142067 · | |
|
This all has to do with one thing. It is much easier for the DOJ to take one corporation into court rather than millions of liars for the fraud they did when they signed the loan papers. | |
| ID: 1142112 · | |
|
It just seems to me that in recession, upturn, bust or boom, the only people consistently making money are the lawyers. Gotta be a message there somewhere. | |
| ID: 1142155 · | |
This all has to do with one thing. It is much easier for the DOJ to take one corporation into court rather than millions of liars for the fraud they did when they signed the loan papers. It should have never gotten to a point where people that were clearly not eligible were allowed to sign anything. Banks and mortgage institutions need to only look at themselves when they make paper that is worthless and they know it going into the sale. Remember they are the ones that are guarantying that the individual was cleared to get a loan. ____________ Proud member of TSWB. End terrorism by building a school | |
| ID: 1142223 · | |
It should have never gotten to a point where people that were clearly not eligible were allowed to sign anything. It's called commission. | |
| ID: 1142226 · | |
|
just remember the song from the movie.... | |
| ID: 1142295 · | |
|
And money stutters <g> just remember the song from the movie.... ____________ | |
| ID: 1142296 · | |
|
No, no - put the millions in jails -- gets us out of the unemployment slump <smile>. This all has to do with one thing. It is much easier for the DOJ to take one corporation into court rather than millions of liars for the fraud they did when they signed the loan papers. ____________ | |
| ID: 1142298 · | |
This all has to do with one thing. It is much easier for the DOJ to take one corporation into court rather than millions of liars for the fraud they did when they signed the loan papers. Banks??? What part of a mortgage broker is a bank? Why do you think they were called sub-prime. No part of a bank ever saw them! It was a wall street firm, now defunct, that should have caught on but "it was our most profitable line of business." They were making too damn much money to look at the total risk they were taking on. Since they were wall street they didn't have to prepare a risk report and pass it on to a regulator like a bank. Greed meet stupidity. The other people who should have caught on were a couple of Government chartered loan companies, but they were forced by law to buy even junk. Nice social engineering law that was and still is. Oh I suppose S&P should have caught on if it wasn't lied to, but that now defunct wall street firm was the one paying S&P's invoice. Radio commercials here are touting option ARM Super Jumbo's again, so it begins again as the laws still haven't been changed. SIGH! I thought there was supposed to be "Change." ____________ | |
| ID: 1142312 · | |
|
By this investigation US government only blocking or warning two other rating agencies Moody's and other to rate down them. In complicated legal society this is most possible way of civilized tyrannical move. | |
| ID: 1142429 · | |
|
Of course the problem with the European rating agencies is that Euro zone finances are not exactly AAA either.
____________ | |
| ID: 1142441 · | |
Of course the problem with the European rating agencies is that Euro zone finances are not exactly AAA either. That is true I'd say in realistic rating all G8 countries today either might BBB or BB status given their constant unstabilities and budget status in the past 24 months. But according to S&P, Moody's and Fitch in their own words they are pretty much equal to God himself that they able to rate anything on this planet on their own ways. But current events proving otherwise. ____________ Mandtugai! | |
| ID: 1142529 · | |
|
The Eurozone has the finance capability of paying the debt. | |
| ID: 1142625 · | |
|
As does the US -- but both entities have political problems. For the Eurozone not only do you have a number of countries with very real debt issues, but also, because of the structure of the EU, the ability to deal with the problems is constrained by the requirement of multi country consensus. You can add to that the issue of an aging population which requires an increasing proportion of the various national budgets to support that population. It would be far worse in the EU if they had the vastly more expensive and less effective for profit health care industry that mars the US financial picture. The Eurozone has the finance capability of paying the debt. ____________ | |
| ID: 1142629 · | |
|
s&p gave Countrywide a AAA rating months before the subprime market inploded | |
| ID: 1142640 · | |
|
Hum... | |
| ID: 1142645 · | |
Message boards : Politics : S&P Under investigation bu US authorities
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |