Please help building my new main cruncher |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Please help building my new main cruncher
1 · 2 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Hi there, Motherboard: My core questions are: Are there better CPUs/GPUs at around the same price? Of the offered RAM modules, which one is the best offer? What do the numbers mean? Are there many situations where 8GB RAM is not enough? I'm not doing HD video editing or anything like that... There is a large price difference between the two motherboards, but I think the cheaper one should be enough for the system I want. Is it correct that the leftmost PCIe bus is a PCIe x1 bus (for my sound card) and the two blue PCIe buses are the ones for the GPUs? Is the space between the to PCIe buses large enough for these two GPUs? If I understand it correctly, SLI is a technology to "combine" the processing power of two GPUs with a special cable. This is certainly useful for video games who can only use one GPU at once, but it is useful for crunching too? Or is BOINC processing faster if the two GPUs remain seperated? The retailer I order at may be unable to install a second GPU (the order mask has no field for 2nd GPU and I must probably order it seperately) and I may have to install it myself. This is not a problem, but could it happen that there is actually not enough space left to install it if the rest of the computer is already assembled? I found no data on the GPUs power usage, how much power must the power supply probably supply at least? Are there any special precautions I must take regarding cooling? The CPU, power supply and GPUs surely come with appropriate coolers, but the system as a whole will probably get very hot, won't it? Sorry for asking so many questions, but the store doesn't offer any customer service except assembling what I order (the components are cheaper than elsewhere, though) and since it's going to cost quite much, I want to be happy after my purchase. Kind regards and thanks in advance, Helsionium ____________ | |
| ID: 1135133 · | |
|
I can comment on the RAM. Id go with the 12GB. yes it costs more ,but if you are going to do 3D gaming and development you will use it. I have 12GB in my I7 920. I do photo editing and watch videos and I never have run out of memory. And I let SETI run while im doing all of the above. | |
| ID: 1135158 · | |
|
Yes, these are all DDR3 modules. | |
| ID: 1135168 · | |
Using SLI does not help with crunching.
That will depend on the case and the length of the card. I do have some cases that can not be used with a second GPU as the drive cage is too close to the motherboard.
The 560Ti is rated at 170W max power and nVidia recommends a PSU of 500W or more for the system (with 1 GPU). The MSI is slightly overclocked so the power draw will be more. I ran an i7 920 with 2pc GTX260 (180W max power) on a 750W PSU without problems so I would go for 750W-850W.
Make sure you have sufficient air flow in the case. Normally, the processor is located above the GPU's and it will use part of the hot air rising from the GPU's for cooling. ____________ | |
| ID: 1135182 · | |
|
Unless you feel you really need 6 cores, I'd say you could save some money and get almost the same level of performance by switching to an i7 2600 (or 2600K if you fell like you will want to overclock). The chip will be significantly cheaper, I would guess (though I don't know your country's pricing) that the motherboard would end up around the same price level, and you could use dual channel RAM instead of triple channel. It's not clear from what you spec'd out below, but are you thinking of using a dual channel kit on an X58 board (since that's what an 8G kit would be)? If that's the case, then you wouldn't be saving any money there, but still, the overall cost would be significantly less. Just something to think about. | |
| ID: 1135215 · | |
Unless you feel you really need 6 cores, I'd say you could save some money and get almost the same level of performance by switching to an i7 2600 (or 2600K if you fell like you will want to overclock). The chip will be significantly cheaper, I would guess (though I don't know your country's pricing) that the motherboard would end up around the same price level, and you could use dual channel RAM instead of triple channel. It's not clear from what you spec'd out below, but are you thinking of using a dual channel kit on an X58 board (since that's what an 8G kit would be)? If that's the case, then you wouldn't be saving any money there, but still, the overall cost would be significantly less. Just something to think about. Thank you for your suggestions, I completely missed that CPU. It's only half the price of the i7-970 and CPU crunching is probably pretty much pointless anyway with these two GPUs. Four cores should be enough for my server and development processes. Also, thanks John van Gorsel for your answers. ____________ | |
| ID: 1135218 · | |
|
I too would recommend the skt.1155 "sandybridge" CPUs, either 2500K (4 cores/4 threads) or 2600K (4 cores/8 threads), and suitable motherboard. | |
| ID: 1135228 · | |
|
You do realize that the Sandy Bridge motherboards have a lot less PCIE lanes so that you can't use as many video cards as you could with say an i7 970. | |
| ID: 1135243 · | |
|
"Dual channel" and (I assume) "triple channel" is marketing-speak for two (three)physically and electrically identical modules. There's no need to buy "special" dual/triple channel modules as long as the ones you get are identical (i.e., same model/part number). | |
| ID: 1135283 · | |
|
If you do go with the current board options you would not need a sound card as both boards have digital out on them. | |
| ID: 1135294 · | |
"Dual channel" and (I assume) "triple channel" is marketing-speak for two (three)physically and electrically identical modules. There's no need to buy "special" dual/triple channel modules as long as the ones you get are identical (i.e., same model/part number). That's correct. I've even seen cases where non-identical memory chips can run in dual-channel or triple-channel configurations providing they fully support the same speed at the same timings as specified by JEDEC and properly programmed into the RAM stick's SPD. | |
| ID: 1135306 · | |
|
I'd really consider getting a solid state drive to boot from. That alone will knock your socks off. Time to load programs and system bootups will be dramatically reduced. As for SSD recommendations I personally use an Intel 510 drive attached to a sata3 capable system board. | |
| ID: 1135375 · | |
|
I'll just chime in here if I may. :D | |
| ID: 1135426 · | |
You do realize that the Sandy Bridge motherboards have a lot less PCIE lanes so that you can't use as many video cards as you could with say an i7 970. The motherboard for my next build has three PCI Express slots - it did did take some searching to find. The first two slots are 16x and the third, provided by a separate chip, is 8x. I've not tried crunching yet with three graphics cards. However I have heard of some people experiencing problems with using four graphics cards, especially dual-chip cards like the 290s. "Dual channel" and (I assume) "triple channel" is marketing-speak for two (three)physically and electrically identical modules. There's no need to buy "special" dual/triple channel modules as long as the ones you get are identical (i.e., same model/part number). It is recommended that you buy the matching RAM as a kit. Sometimes RAM of different makes and speeds will work OK together (they'll all run at the frequencies of the slowest module), other times you may run into problems. I've had problems with seemingly identical RAM modules that were purchased individually. ____________ Brian. | |
| ID: 1135472 · | |
|
Thank you for all your suggestions. | |
| ID: 1135497 · | |
Thank you for all your suggestions. It just so happens that Tom's Hardware tested GPU scaling. It looks like for dual cards the P67 is the way to go. In many cases the P67 at x8/x8 was better or close to the X58 at x16/x16. ____________ SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today! | |
| ID: 1135521 · | |
|
For GPU computing, the # of lanes shouldn't matter very much, as almost all the computing is done onboard the GPU and its memory; at least for the NVIDIA apps, they only use main memory to load the WU data at the start and maybe when checkpointing (?). And that's a small percent of the overall time for any WU. Thus mainboard memory speed doesn't affect them that much either. | |
| ID: 1136148 · | |
For GPU computing, the # of lanes shouldn't matter very much, as almost all the computing is done onboard the GPU and its memory; at least for the NVIDIA apps, they only use main memory to load the WU data at the start and maybe when checkpointing (?). And that's a small percent of the overall time for any WU. Thus mainboard memory speed doesn't affect them that much either. I think you might have missed the part in their initial post about this being a gaming dev machine & not a dedicated cruncher. However, with so many boards that can run 4, or more, x8 slots these days I so think that is sound advice for a dedicated cruncher. A year or so ago I recall someone was doing testing with cards in their 3rd or 4th PCIe slot that was only x4. I think some slowdown was noted, but not that much. It would be interesting to see how the newer cards of today benchmarked in this configuration. With them being so fast a larger porting of their time would be loading data in and out of the card & the difference might be more significant. ____________ SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today! | |
| ID: 1136234 · | |
Thanks for catching my error. My bad. ____________ | |
| ID: 1136271 · | |
|
Well thanks to all of your suggestions, I was able to cut costs while improving performance. | |
| ID: 1136324 · | |
Message boards : Number crunching : Please help building my new main cruncher
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |