I hate those guys :-)


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : I hate those guys :-)

Author Message
Profile Tim
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 19 May 99
Posts: 209
Credit: 267,162,727
RAC: 88,637
Greece
Message 1131632 - Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 8:28:52 UTC

I have 23 AP tasks pending, and all my wingman's stop their computers for so long.
Now i must wait, so those tasks will be assign to another computer.

And if this happen again?

____________

Profile S@NL - XP_Freak
Send message
Joined: 10 Jul 99
Posts: 99
Credit: 5,156,733
RAC: 781
Netherlands
Message 1131743 - Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 16:07:59 UTC - in response to Message 1131632.


And if this happen again?

Then you'll have to wait a bit longer. :)

____________

Goodbye Seti Classic

Profile James Sotherden
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 16 May 99
Posts: 9479
Credit: 43,686,646
RAC: 41,253
United States
Message 1131749 - Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 16:18:28 UTC - in response to Message 1131743.


And if this happen again?

Then you'll have to wait a bit longer. :)


Better Yet, Buy your wingman or woman an I7 980 :)
____________

Old James

Sirius B
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 13085
Credit: 1,878,024
RAC: 423
Message 1131751 - Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 16:19:27 UTC - in response to Message 1131749.


And if this happen again?

Then you'll have to wait a bit longer. :)


Better Yet, Buy your wingman or woman an I7 980 :)



or even better, fed-ex it to me & I'll become your permanent wingman...lol
____________

Profile BMH
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 May 99
Posts: 340
Credit: 104,619,348
RAC: 9,955
United Kingdom
Message 1131757 - Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 16:27:27 UTC

Just wondering, can you be your own wingman if you have more than one computer?

I guess it's not really optional but more theoretically possible?
____________
Brian.

msattlerProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 40914
Credit: 666,530,601
RAC: 364,694
United States
Message 1131763 - Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 16:32:19 UTC - in response to Message 1131757.

Just wondering, can you be your own wingman if you have more than one computer?

I guess it's not really optional but more theoretically possible?

I suspect so, although I can't say that I have seen anybody post such an occurrence. I think the scheduler doles work out keeping track of individual hosts without concern for the master account they are attached to.
So I don't see why it could not happen.

As to the odds.......
____________
*********************************************
Behold the power of kitty!!

I have met a few friends in my life.
Most were cats.

Profile Donald L. JohnsonProject donor
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 02
Posts: 7034
Credit: 1,353,845
RAC: 4,680
United States
Message 1131804 - Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 17:37:31 UTC - in response to Message 1131763.

Just wondering, can you be your own wingman if you have more than one computer?

I guess it's not really optional but more theoretically possible?

I suspect so, although I can't say that I have seen anybody post such an occurrence. I think the scheduler doles work out keeping track of individual hosts without concern for the master account they are attached to.
So I don't see why it could not happen.

As to the odds.......

Yeah, both of your machines would have to hit the scheduler at pretty much the exact same time...
Tough to do even with simultaneous manual update requests.
____________
Donald
Infernal Optimist / Submariner, retired

Josef W. SegurProject donor
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 4461
Credit: 1,312,549
RAC: 54
United States
Message 1131835 - Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 18:19:20 UTC - in response to Message 1131763.

Just wondering, can you be your own wingman if you have more than one computer?

I guess it's not really optional but more theoretically possible?

I suspect so, although I can't say that I have seen anybody post such an occurrence. I think the scheduler doles work out keeping track of individual hosts without concern for the master account they are attached to.
So I don't see why it could not happen.

As to the odds.......

This project uses the project configuration setting <one_result_per_user_per_wu/>, so one account should never get two tasks for the same WU. Without that or the similar <one_result_per_host_per_wu/> a single work request would often get both of the tasks for a single WU because the initial replication puts the two tasks adjacent in the "Results ready to send" queue.
Joe

1mp0£173
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1131838 - Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 18:26:15 UTC - in response to Message 1131632.
Last modified: 25 Jul 2011, 18:26:38 UTC

I have 23 AP tasks pending, and all my wingman's stop their computers for so long.
Now i must wait, so those tasks will be assign to another computer.

And if this happen again?

It's called Volunteer Computing and dedication varies -- a lot.

If you want to eliminate things like late (or lost) work, you simply have to limit the project to the most reliable volunteers and most reliable computers.

Once you do that (and eliminate the vast majority of the volunteers) then these sorts of events will be quite rare.

But that's not reality. We should be saying "look how well all this stuff works with random hardware and casual volunteers!"

Waiting is.

-BeNt-
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 99
Posts: 1234
Credit: 10,116,112
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1132113 - Posted: 26 Jul 2011, 4:37:25 UTC

Guess we know who's not in it for the science lol.
____________
Traveling through space at ~67,000mph!

Message boards : Number crunching : I hate those guys :-)

Copyright © 2015 University of California