Prez is Good, Real Good. You've Won. Time to Get 'er Done. |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : Prez is Good, Real Good. You've Won. Time to Get 'er Done.
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 33 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Just listened to his Speech. The Kid can kick butt. | |
| ID: 1130747 · | |
|
Unfortunately, the president would not take yes for an answer...You know, | |
| ID: 1132123 · | |
|
The Bonehead has it wrong because the government IS the people. | |
| ID: 1132340 · | |
|
The Right is Right on this one. Cut, Cap and Balance. Makes Perfect Sense. | |
| ID: 1132397 · | |
Government is the only vehicle through which the people can express their will. It's also the only method which one can force one's will and views upon another and get away with it legally. Anti-gay marriage rights, mixture of church and state, censorship of freedom of expression all come to mind as examples. Why do so many rightists hate government so much, yet spend their lives in government? Not that I consider myself a right-wing at all, but I'd hazard a guess that they get into government to keep it from getting too big to the point where it doesn't need to answer to the people like many leftists seem to want. But then there's the problem of forcing religious conservative views upon the nation through the use of government force in the form of laws. Both sides have axes to grind, we all know this. The trick is to not get too drawn into either side so as to start believing their lies. | |
| ID: 1132543 · | |
iWorm 'em. I take it this is Darwins Worm posting under an alias. If not, gawd help us, we have two of 'em! | |
| ID: 1132545 · | |
|
no he just changed his name. It's still the devils advocate running amuck | |
| ID: 1132956 · | |
|
If Speeches were Dollars, I wouldn't worry anymore. From the song by Don Henley-If Dirt were Dollars. | |
| ID: 1133471 · | |
|
unfortunately for everyone that isn't elected in the US this is a political ploy on both parts. Congress works on Negotiated plans. this congress is dealing with a split Republican party where at least 100 will not vote for an increase in the debt ceiling no matter what. That leaves boehner as a powerless leader of a divided party. | |
| ID: 1133543 · | |
|
All spending bills must start in the House. So the majority party in the House is fractured and can't get a plan passed to start the process. The Senate plan doesn't cut as much as S&P says is required to keep a AAA credit rating, yet Obama warns about a downgrade and says pass a plan that will result in a credit rating cut. I don't get this crap at all. Does he really want the IMF to have to bail out America? | |
| ID: 1133578 · | |
|
What we might see is Boehner resigning and then -- since the Republican party is so fractured into Republicans and Norquistican/Tea Party folks, perhaps the next speaker will be a compromise candidate - a Blue Dog *Democrat*. Just a thought, since the Norquistican/Tea Party is not a majority of the Republican party and has demonstrated that they are not really a part of the Republican party. They have no inclination of governance -- which is in fact (though they don't realize it) what they are paid good money to do. | |
| ID: 1133583 · | |
|
Sorry -- the Boehner bill can't pass the House, he doesn't have the votes or loyalty of the third party (Tea Party) in his Republican coalition majority.
____________ | |
| ID: 1133586 · | |
|
One man out of 307 Million People is Stopping it. | |
| ID: 1134245 · | |
|
[/quote]I would REALLY like to see the Norquistican/Tea Party form itself formally as a third party and then run a full slate of candidates, along side Republican and Democrat candidates in the coming election.[/quote] | |
| ID: 1134255 · | |
|
The Pres now says that whether or not he wins a second term depends entirely on him and not who the Republicans choose. Well, duhhh. A President who runs for a second term and looses or decides not to run has always had only himself to blame. | |
| ID: 1135094 · | |
If Speeches were Dollars, I wouldn't worry anymore. From the song by Don Henley-If Dirt were Dollars. 365 * 3 = 1095. Now, yes, we're a few months away from him being in office for 3 years. So, if he has given a speech a day, then we barely get into the "thousand" range. But, you have pluralized thousand, to make it thousands. And you get made when others exaggerate. Shame, shame, SHAME! Ya shoulda known better ... than to exaggerate to me. Shame, SHAME, *SHAME*! Now it don't matta! | |
| ID: 1137755 · | |
The Pres now says that whether or not he wins a second term depends entirely on him and not who the Republicans choose. Well, duhhh. A President who runs for a second term and looses or decides not to run has always had only himself to blame. Looses? What is he loosening? The knot on his tie? If he's not re-elected, he LOSES, not LOOSES. For something-or-other's sake or lack of sake, SPELL IT RIGHT. | |
| ID: 1137756 · | |
|
Ah, you saw right through that didn't you <smile> -- makes you perhaps smarter and less doctrinaire than the average Norquistican/Tea Party faithful.
____________ | |
| ID: 1137759 · | |
One man out of 307 Million People is Stopping it. Ha. Ha ha. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. OMG, you're ramblings would make me roll on the floor, but I was never told to roll on floors in the speeches, so I can't!!! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! I'd keep on typing "HA"s, but besides the fact that I wasn't told to in speeches, well, even most of people across the spectrum realize how ridiculously you make your points ... when you make a point, that is. | |
| ID: 1137760 · | |
|
I would REALLY like to see the Norquistican/Tea Party form itself formally as a third party and then run a full slate of candidates, along side Republican and Democrat candidates in the coming election.[/quote] That would assure the re-election of the president. The 40% who don't pay taxes and/or the 44% who get a check from the government would vote Democratic, Moderates and right wingers would split the Republican vote. We would have to allow all the states to split the electoral vote and then have a runoff among the top two. As of now it's winner-take-all in most states. Technically, the electors are not bound to vote for the plurality winner but so far as I know they do.[/quote] Most states? What state does NOT use Plurality? (And, I think if we looked, we might find rare instances where the elector did not vote in the direction of the Plurality winner of the popular vote.) | |
| ID: 1137761 · | |
Message boards : Politics : Prez is Good, Real Good. You've Won. Time to Get 'er Done.
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |