Are Galaxies Polarized?

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Are Galaxies Polarized?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile hiamps
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 May 99
Posts: 4292
Credit: 72,971,319
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1127798 - Posted: 15 Jul 2011, 9:49:52 UTC
Last modified: 15 Jul 2011, 10:00:27 UTC

If each Galaxy has it's own Polariztion then they would seperate faster and faster without dark matter...just a thought.

EDIT: I don't know if Galaxies put out giant magnetic fields like I have seen images of Earths. If they do they must extend a long long ways. Over time many galaxies would have "Bounced" off other galaxies fields and some would move faster some one way some another. Seems it would explain a whole lot a Woman on "Through the Wormhole" was trying to explain about dark energy....
Official Abuser of Boinc Buttons...
And no good credit hound!
ID: 1127798 · Report as offensive
Profile Johnney Guinness
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 06
Posts: 3093
Credit: 2,652,287
RAC: 0
Ireland
Message 1128180 - Posted: 16 Jul 2011, 4:13:33 UTC
Last modified: 16 Jul 2011, 4:16:53 UTC

I actually don't know what you mean when you ask Are Galaxies Polarized?

So my answer would be no.

And what you suggested about galaxy's bouncing off each other is way off the mark. Astronomers have thousands of images of Galaxy's actually crashing into each other. But instead of a crash, its more like they gently merge with each other to form one single larger galaxy. Galaxy's never repel each other!

Today's science would suggest that both galaxy's sit in a gravitational well and that's why they attract each other. Personally i would disagree with modern science, but that's just my personal opinion.

Two merging galaxies;



John.
ID: 1128180 · Report as offensive
Profile Michael John Hind
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Feb 07
Posts: 1330
Credit: 3,632,028
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1129543 - Posted: 19 Jul 2011, 1:38:54 UTC - in response to Message 1127798.  

If each Galaxy has it's own Polariztion then they would seperate faster and faster without dark matter...just a thought.

EDIT: I don't know if Galaxies put out giant magnetic fields like I have seen images of Earths. If they do they must extend a long long ways. Over time many galaxies would have "Bounced" off other galaxies fields and some would move faster some one way some another. Seems it would explain a whole lot a Woman on "Through the Wormhole" was trying to explain about dark energy....


I wonder if hiamps meant a galaxy magnetically polarized as a whole body?
Since galaxies seem to form a spiraling circle this would suggest that magnetic polarization probably does not exist. But the foregoing is only a quick assumption on my part here. I'm trying to imaging what would occur if you magnetized a whole load of of ball bearings. Then once magnitized you placed them on a glass surface, how would they form up, what shape would the whole mass take on?
ID: 1129543 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 1129674 - Posted: 19 Jul 2011, 12:47:11 UTC - in response to Message 1129543.  

I'd say no galaxies are not polarized. If that were true our solar system would be spinning along the galactic plane. from what I've read and seen it does not. Our sun spins at an angle to the galactic plane. This could just mean that we are not original members of the Milky way galaxy and were absorbed as part of a smaller galaxy billions of years ago. Or there really isn't any actual order inside a galaxy


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 1129674 · Report as offensive
Profile Michael John Hind
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Feb 07
Posts: 1330
Credit: 3,632,028
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1129795 - Posted: 19 Jul 2011, 21:09:42 UTC - in response to Message 1129674.  

I'd say no galaxies are not polarized. If that were true our solar system would be spinning along the galactic plane. from what I've read and seen it does not. Our sun spins at an angle to the galactic plane. This could just mean that we are not original members of the Milky way galaxy and were absorbed as part of a smaller galaxy billions of years ago. Or there really isn't any actual order inside a galaxy


The galaxy's circling shaped spiral would suggest some element of order at least.
ID: 1129795 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 1129815 - Posted: 19 Jul 2011, 21:41:26 UTC - in response to Message 1129795.  

true there is a direction to the spin however you'll notice that there are left and right spin galaxies.


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 1129815 · Report as offensive
Profile Allie in Vancouver
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 07
Posts: 3949
Credit: 1,604,668
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1131845 - Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 18:41:26 UTC - in response to Message 1129815.  

true there is a direction to the spin however you'll notice that there are left and right spin galaxies.


I think that depends on the observer more than an actual attribute of the galaxy. See from one side, a galaxy would have a right-hand spin but zip over to the other side and it would have a left-handed spin.

Pure mathematics is, in its way, the poetry of logical ideas.

Albert Einstein
ID: 1131845 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30648
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1131872 - Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 19:29:17 UTC - in response to Message 1131845.  

true there is a direction to the spin however you'll notice that there are left and right spin galaxies.


I think that depends on the observer more than an actual attribute of the galaxy. See from one side, a galaxy would have a right-hand spin but zip over to the other side and it would have a left-handed spin.

Which way is north?

Actually I wonder if a study of galaxy spin direction might tell us something about the plasma and the vortexes in it near the plank time. Perhaps not because of galaxy collisions.

ID: 1131872 · Report as offensive
SirT
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Oct 99
Posts: 5
Credit: 1,609,571
RAC: 0
New Zealand
Message 1132860 - Posted: 28 Jul 2011, 6:08:46 UTC

The first and obvious question is: What do you mean by galaxy polarisation? It's not at all obvious.

Do you mean its emissions? What kinds then? If any - from far infra-red to gamma rays then the answer is clearly no. Polarised matter? What's that? Anything else?

You need to define what it is you are asking about.
ID: 1132860 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 1132874 - Posted: 28 Jul 2011, 7:05:01 UTC

I've read of a recent survey of galaxies rotating clockwise or counterclockwise. If I remember well counterclockwise are more frequent.
Tullio
ID: 1132874 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20283
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 1133476 - Posted: 29 Jul 2011, 14:48:58 UTC - in response to Message 1132874.  

I've read of a recent survey of galaxies rotating clockwise or counterclockwise. If I remember well counterclockwise are more frequent.


Yes, there's this recent report:

Was the universe born spinning?

The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis – that is the bold conclusion of physicists in the US who have studied the rotation of more than 15,000 galaxies. ...


Well, there's some deep thought needed to untangle that one! There's also a high level of uncertainty with the restriction of viewing only from the single perspective we have from the Earth.


Not sure what is meant by "polarisation" for this thread. However, there could well be significant effects from galaxies harbouring a net electrical charge and from magnetic lines of force. There may even be galactic winds pushing along just as there is a solar wind for our solar system...

Also, could the pattern of dust clouds unbalance the net pressure from the radiation from a galaxy to distort the picture?

And then there is gravity.


It's all a question of how detailed you might want to go!

Keep searchin',
Martin

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 1133476 · Report as offensive
Profile Michael John Hind
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Feb 07
Posts: 1330
Credit: 3,632,028
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1133638 - Posted: 29 Jul 2011, 19:31:47 UTC - in response to Message 1133476.  
Last modified: 29 Jul 2011, 19:33:23 UTC

[quote]I've read of a recent survey of galaxies rotating clockwise or counterclockwise. If I remember well counterclockwise are more frequent.


Yes, there's this recent report:

Was the universe born spinning?

The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis – that is the bold conclusion of physicists in the US who have studied the rotation of more than 15,000 galaxies. ...



Born spinning or born tumbling? Spinning being more orderly than tumbling which is more erratic in rotations. The formation of galaxies came after the big-bang and after the first formation of matter. I'd say that the universe was formed tumbling that then lead to the formation of galaxies that are spinning.
ID: 1133638 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 1133688 - Posted: 29 Jul 2011, 21:28:16 UTC - in response to Message 1133638.  

isn't spinning just organized tumbling


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 1133688 · Report as offensive
Profile Michael John Hind
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Feb 07
Posts: 1330
Credit: 3,632,028
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1133705 - Posted: 29 Jul 2011, 22:33:38 UTC

If the universe is shown to be expanding at equal rates along all planes then I suppose you could assume a more orderly pattern to events leading up to the creation of matter. If expansion can be shown not to be equally spaced out along all planes then you could assume a less orderly creation of our universe. Where, in the latter case, energy was more selectively bunched when forming matter hence interference could co-exist between this forming matter creating a tumbling effect rather than just a spiraling effect. Did matter occur at the center of the big-bang or was it created some distance away from it. If matter was created at some distance away from the bang then I would consider the creation to be more orderly in fashion. I.E. at a set point away from the bang matter was then being able to be formed hence less likely to interfere with other matter since there could only be matter forming aside of it, nothing forming behind it and ahead of it matter flying away already formed.

Perhaps the spiraling we see in our galaxies came about due to the energy, built up inside the big-bang, actually spiraling itself prior to release. Hence causing all matter to tend to spiral so giving us instant gravity on creation.

Hey Skildude any chance of a Nobel Prize here....just having a laugh
ID: 1133705 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 1134809 - Posted: 1 Aug 2011, 15:37:08 UTC - in response to Message 1133705.  

the universe at one time billions of years ago may have expanded equally in all directions. the interaction of Galaxies with one another seems to quash that theory. If super clusters attract other matter it would make sense that the expansion in those areas is slowed a bit


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 1134809 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Are Galaxies Polarized?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.