Message boards :
Number crunching :
to the Seti staff
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Skywalker66 @ Berlin Send message Joined: 31 Jan 01 Posts: 78 Credit: 27,692,349 RAC: 0 |
Please check your Network, it is not working for all people that helps you for the project..... since many days the scheduler and up and download server can´t connecting for all people. It is no error by the users. a user from here means, this must be a bad routing table map in seti server !!! ?????? here a official test by external site by traceroute.org to the seti server (208.68.240.20): 2 te1-4.dsr01.hstntx1.networklayer.com (207.218.223.5) 0.348 ms 0.396 ms 0.366 ms 3 po15.dsr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (70.87.253.109) 0.936 ms po16.dsr02.hstntx2.networklayer.com (70.87.253.105) 0.785 ms po15.dsr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (70.87.253.109) 0.971 ms 4 e5-2.ibr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (74.55.252.33) 0.724 ms e5-4.ibr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (74.55.252.37) 0.740 ms e5-2.ibr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (74.55.252.33) 0.703 ms 5 e5-4.ibr03.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.49) 6.502 ms 6.289 ms 6.820 ms 6 te9-1.dsr02.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.22) 6.318 ms te9-1.dsr01.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.6) 6.566 ms te2-2.dsr01.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.26) 6.311 ms 7 e4-3.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.37) 6.536 ms e4-4.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.41) 6.271 ms e4-3.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.37) 6.500 ms 8 10gigabitethernet3-1.core1.dal1.he.net (206.223.118.37) 7.480 ms 14.341 ms 6.438 ms 9 10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.phx1.he.net (72.52.92.253) 37.671 ms 27.363 ms 27.398 ms 10 10gigabitethernet2-2.core1.lax1.he.net (72.52.92.249) 40.910 ms 37.371 ms 37.127 ms 11 10gigabitethernet1-3.core1.pao1.he.net (72.52.92.21) 47.414 ms 52.799 ms 50.149 ms 12 64.71.140.42 (64.71.140.42) 45.697 ms 45.592 ms 45.638 ms 13 208.68.243.254 (208.68.243.254) 80.634 ms 77.827 ms 76.837 ms 14 * * * 15 * * * * * * = error my option for the time is, i use a free proxy port from sites or people. This is heavy dangerous, also it works. Only the most free proxys close after a day or i must actual the ip. that is no funny. and not all do work with RPC greetings PS: a official answer were wonderful |
justsomeguy Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 84 Credit: 6,084,595 RAC: 11 |
funny...I realize that it's not working for everyone, I have two win7 boxes that aren't working myself. here's info from this linux box... laptop@laptop-laptop:~$ traceroute 208.68.240.20 traceroute to 208.68.240.20 (208.68.240.20), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.141.70.1 (10.141.70.1) 1.459 ms 2.449 ms 3.200 ms 2 134.163.4.193 (134.163.4.193) 14.921 ms 15.155 ms 15.363 ms 3 134.163.136.10 (134.163.136.10) 15.644 ms 15.787 ms 15.948 ms 4 icapl250.shellus.com (134.163.253.250) 16.209 ms 16.427 ms 16.580 ms 5 12.119.213.117 (12.119.213.117) 16.905 ms 17.121 ms 17.548 ms 6 cr2.hs1tx.ip.att.net (12.123.212.198) 25.399 ms 21.568 ms 26.122 ms 7 cr1.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.122.28.157) 22.785 ms 24.318 ms 22.947 ms 8 dlstx01jt.ip.att.net (12.122.80.41) 29.475 ms 31.002 ms 31.223 ms 9 192.205.32.190 (192.205.32.190) 26.120 ms 27.988 ms 192.205.34.82 (192.205.34.82) 28.243 ms 10 Hurrican-Electric-LLC.Port-channel100.ar3.SJC2.gblx.net (64.214.174.246) 76.400 ms 76.206 ms 76.527 ms 11 10gigabitethernet3-2.core1.pao1.he.net (72.52.92.69) 79.053 ms 73.272 ms 79.158 ms 12 64.71.140.42 (64.71.140.42) 65.281 ms 64.939 ms 64.903 ms 13 208.68.243.254 (208.68.243.254) 93.221 ms 93.790 ms 93.927 ms 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * followed by: Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:39:30 AM CDT Running CPU benchmarks Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:39:30 AM CDT Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:40:01 AM CDT Benchmark results: Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:40:01 AM CDT Number of CPUs: 2 Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:40:01 AM CDT 1550 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:40:01 AM CDT 3819 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:40:03 AM CDT Resuming computation Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:34:47 AM CDT SETI@home Computation for task 12ap11ab.12159.8403.12.10.207_0 finished Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:34:47 AM CDT SETI@home Starting 13dc10ab.10471.4727.11.10.182_1 Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:34:47 AM CDT SETI@home Starting task 13dc10ab.10471.4727.11.10.182_1 using setiathome_enhanced version 603 Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:34:49 AM CDT SETI@home Started upload of 12ap11ab.12159.8403.12.10.207_0_0 Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:34:52 AM CDT SETI@home Finished upload of 12ap11ab.12159.8403.12.10.207_0_0 Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:51:34 AM CDT SETI@home update requested by user Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:51:38 AM CDT SETI@home Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:51:38 AM CDT SETI@home Reporting 2 completed tasks, not requesting new tasks Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:51:41 AM CDT SETI@home Scheduler request completed and the 2 tasks were uploaded. the *** is not an error. The routers are simply programmed to not respond to ping requests....ie no DOS ability Kevin "Two things are infinite: The universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein |
Skywalker66 @ Berlin Send message Joined: 31 Jan 01 Posts: 78 Credit: 27,692,349 RAC: 0 |
funny...I realize that it's not working for everyone, I have two win7 boxes hello Kevin it want to show that any People tests for this problem ( like Threat http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=64523) from differen providers and Computers[/url] and not at all the test picture site of the server are working and shown. for a few days i have a pc from my farm here, here is it not connecting, he go at home, plug in his modem and can connecting... no differns in the configuration were changed ......... ??????????? greetings Thomas |
Link Send message Joined: 18 Sep 03 Posts: 834 Credit: 1,807,369 RAC: 0 |
Hmm... I don't see any problems from here, even with my UMTS connection, which is not the best on this planet. 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 172.10.20.1 2 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung. 3 188 ms 205 ms 184 ms 10.80.4.74 4 192 ms 205 ms 191 ms 82.113.103.70 5 188 ms 211 ms 197 ms IARFRA1-Gi0-2-199.net.de.o2.com [82.113.103.34] 6 267 ms 307 ms 259 ms xmwc-frnk-de01-gigaet-1-4-500.nw.mediaways.net [195.71.237.113] 7 234 ms 305 ms 273 ms 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.lon1.he.net [195.66.224.21] 8 341 ms 353 ms 347 ms 10gigabitethernet6-3.core1.ash1.he.net [72.52.92.137] 9 378 ms 365 ms 365 ms 10gigabitethernet1-4.core1.pao1.he.net [72.52.92.29] 10 380 ms 359 ms 366 ms 64.71.140.42 11 433 ms 441 ms 424 ms 208.68.243.254 12 509 ms 891 ms 458 ms setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.20] Actually, now that the splitters are somehow slow, the connection to SETI is working unusually good. |
Skywalker66 @ Berlin Send message Joined: 31 Jan 01 Posts: 78 Credit: 27,692,349 RAC: 0 |
that what i say, many users can connect.... any no go. Do you think i go from my free will over a proxy? in the last 10 years i go always direct. i am grey hairy while to many test come to kill the connect problem ;-) ;-) are any users like me blacklisted on the server ? ;-) lol |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
I think the point being made is that if some users can connect, then the problem cannot be SETI's as your first post requests them to fix the issue. If some users can connect and others cannot, then the problem must exist somewhere in between those who cannot connect and Berkeley. |
Skywalker66 @ Berlin Send message Joined: 31 Jan 01 Posts: 78 Credit: 27,692,349 RAC: 0 |
I think the point being made is that if some users can connect, then the problem cannot be SETI's as your first post requests them to fix the issue. this answer is to easy for me. it must be mysterious that with the server damage on 27.5.2011 and with the new start. At this exact time point, any providers begin to start to change anything on her cables and configuration ? And then not omly one Provider ? Never ....... on my sytem were no great changes go and my system was running fine with Berkeley in the last years. only to 15.06.2011 the change by me is only Boinc 6.12.26 !!!! And it work no downgrade on 6.10.60 like before. only a fresh installation and lost many datas |
-BeNt- Send message Joined: 17 Oct 99 Posts: 1234 Credit: 10,116,112 RAC: 0 |
You do realize that routing is controlled by many many people between you and Seti servers. If others can connect it's not an issue with Seti, it's something to do with the routing through various providers to you. Cabling and local server configuration on the Seti side would affect everyone in the project, not just you or a single provider. Of course unless they have used IPSEC etc, to block communication with a provider, which I doubt they would do because they need all the help they can get. I would suggest you check your network by going through a different DNS or a proxy and see if you can raise Seti. Traveling through space at ~67,000mph! |
Jim_S Send message Joined: 23 Feb 00 Posts: 4705 Credit: 64,560,357 RAC: 31 |
Check My posts in "Panic Mode" #s 48 & 49...And I have tried Everything. My problems started on the same day. I Desire Peace and Justice, Jim Scott (Mod-Ret.) |
-BeNt- Send message Joined: 17 Oct 99 Posts: 1234 Credit: 10,116,112 RAC: 0 |
Check My posts in "Panic Mode" #s 48 & 49...And I have tried Everything. Yeah read through your posts. You seem to be getting communication with the servers since you can push through a scheduler request, you just can't upload? On my end everything is cherry, at least for the moment. My workunits are going through as fast as ever on the download and uploads. One machine I have is pushing them just about as fast as it's getting them done, the other for some reason likes to hold on to a few before it does anything. This is on 6.10.60/6.10.58 Boinc. What version are you guys running? Traveling through space at ~67,000mph! |
Jim_S Send message Joined: 23 Feb 00 Posts: 4705 Credit: 64,560,357 RAC: 31 |
Check My posts in "Panic Mode" #s 48 & 49...And I have tried Everything. 6.10.58 here,I was waiting for everything to upload to upgrade my BOINC and Video Drivers. I Desire Peace and Justice, Jim Scott (Mod-Ret.) |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
I think the point being made is that if some users can connect, then the problem cannot be SETI's as your first post requests them to fix the issue. Ok, but what about the users that can connect? The system is only broke for some but not for others? The only way that can be true is if something is wrong somewhere between the two networks of those that cannot connect. Other than pointing out a coicidence, can you point out exactly how such a half-broken configuration can occur in networking that would replicate this situation strictly on SETI's end of the connection? Be sure to read -BeNt-'s reply first before you attempt to do so. |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
This is on 6.10.60/6.10.58 Boinc. What version are you guys running? 6.12.26 here, and I'm not having any issues. I also use my own private DNS servers at home. |
Jim_S Send message Joined: 23 Feb 00 Posts: 4705 Credit: 64,560,357 RAC: 31 |
I tried to connect using my neighbors using a wireless dongle last week and no joy...And they are on Insight. I'm on bbtel (Local Telecom) and got the same messages from both. I Desire Peace and Justice, Jim Scott (Mod-Ret.) |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
6.10.56 is working fine here for me on XP, Vista and Win7. All uploading/reporting/downloading is doing very well in fact. Cheers. |
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22199 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
No problems here with a combination of 6.10.60 on windoze XP pro and 6.10.59 on 32 bit Ubuntu. Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
Blurf Send message Joined: 2 Sep 06 Posts: 8962 Credit: 12,678,685 RAC: 0 |
No problems for me (using WinXP and Win7). |
tbret Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 3380 Credit: 296,162,071 RAC: 40 |
I tried to connect using my neighbors using a wireless dongle last week and no joy...And they are on Insight. I'm on bbtel (Local Telecom) and got the same messages from both. I had the same sort of trouble with one of five computers which was also one of three on the same router. It went four days without connecting. I kept getting "Internet...ok, project...down" messages. The other two computers on the same router were fine and were connecting. I was told to leave it alone. I did. It connected a day later without my touching anything. Will leaving it alone, changing nothing, work for you? I do not know, but you have done everything I could think-of and some things I did not think of. You may be rewarded by walking away and just waiting. There is something happening somewhere that I know nothing about. I still do not know what it is that I did not know, but I now know that there is something I do not know. |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
Works fine for me, including the traceroutes. [omitting the first 5 hops for paranoia reasons] 6 29 ms 24 ms 25 ms te-1-2-0-5-cr01.miami.fl.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.93.161] 7 25 ms 25 ms 26 ms pos-0-2-0-0-pe01.nota.fl.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.87.158] 8 29 ms 24 ms 23 ms te8-2-10G.ar2.MIA2.gblx.net [64.215.195.225] 9 101 ms 105 ms 92 ms Hurrican-Electric-LLC.Port-channel100.ar3.SJC2.gblx.net [64.214.174.246] 10 116 ms 94 ms 99 ms 10gigabitethernet3-2.core1.pao1.he.net [72.52.92.69] 11 96 ms 95 ms 93 ms 64.71.140.42 12 100 ms 99 ms 102 ms 208.68.243.254 13 99 ms 103 ms 100 ms setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.20] Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Skywalker66 @ Berlin Send message Joined: 31 Jan 01 Posts: 78 Credit: 27,692,349 RAC: 0 |
2 te1-4.dsr01.hstntx1.networklayer.com (207.218.223.5) 0.365 ms 0.440 ms 0.343 ms 3 po16.dsr02.hstntx2.networklayer.com (70.87.253.105) 0.648 ms po15.dsr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (70.87.253.109) 0.806 ms po16.dsr02.hstntx2.networklayer.com (70.87.253.105) 0.807 ms 4 e5-4.ibr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (74.55.252.37) 0.760 ms e5-2.ibr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (74.55.252.33) 0.509 ms e5-4.ibr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (74.55.252.37) 0.511 ms 5 e5-4.ibr03.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.49) 6.525 ms 6.562 ms 6.329 ms 6 te2-2.dsr01.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.26) 7.579 ms te3-5.dsr01.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.86) 10.335 ms te9-1.dsr02.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.22) 6.582 ms 7 e4-3.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.37) 6.534 ms e6-1.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.45) 6.346 ms e4-4.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.41) 6.638 ms 8 10gigabitethernet3-1.core1.dal1.he.net (206.223.118.37) 6.524 ms 14.360 ms 6.442 ms 9 10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.phx1.he.net (72.52.92.253) 27.409 ms 27.596 ms 27.417 ms 10 10gigabitethernet2-2.core1.lax1.he.net (72.52.92.249) 36.911 ms 36.856 ms 37.656 ms 11 10gigabitethernet1-3.core1.pao1.he.net (72.52.92.21) 54.404 ms 45.356 ms 45.403 ms 12 64.71.140.42 (64.71.140.42) 45.631 ms 45.844 ms 45.382 ms 13 208.68.243.254 (208.68.243.254) 79.877 ms 84.566 ms 76.888 ms 14 * * * 15 * * * i have win 7 and xp , both not connecting and i have tested, all version 6.10.60 and 6.12.26 with a new fresh and clean installation will not connecting. she downloads the Master File from server and then nothing |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.