Panic Mode On (49) Server problems?

Author	Message
Gary Charpentier Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30646 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32	Message 1120687 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 2:16:42 UTC $ traceroute setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu traceroute to setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu (208.68.240.20), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 * * * 2 L100.LSANCA-DSL-20.verizon-gni.net (71.108.177.1) 23.519 ms 22.783 ms 23.264 ms 3 P11-0.LSANCA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.44.162) 23.013 ms 23.719 ms 23.293 ms 4 so-7-3-0-0.LAX01-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.217) 24.235 ms 99.474 ms 99.893 ms 5 0.so-6-2-0.XT1.LAX7.ALTER.NET (152.63.112.45) 24.169 ms 23.963 ms 24.717 ms 6 0.ge-2-0-0.XL3.LAX15.ALTER.NET (152.63.2.66) 24.199 ms 24.276 ms 24.276 ms 7 TenGigE0-6-1-0.GW4.LAX15.ALTER.NET (152.63.114.209) 24.211 ms TenGigE0-6-2-0.GW4.LAX15.ALTER.NET (152.63.114.213) 25.021 ms 40.168 ms 8 teliasonera-gw.customer.alter.net (152.179.21.42) 24.921 ms 24.337 ms 28.439 ms 9 sjo-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.16) 35.734 ms 38.447 ms 46.056 ms 10 hurricane-113209-sjo-bb1.c.telia.net (213.248.86.54) 37.956 ms 38.021 ms 40.680 ms 11 64.71.140.42 (64.71.140.42) 36.689 ms 35.779 ms 35.814 ms 12 208.68.243.254 (208.68.243.254) 55.821 ms 43.790 ms 47.918 ms 13 * * * 14 * * * ... but: $ ping setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu PING setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu (208.68.240.20): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 208.68.240.20: icmp_seq=0 ttl=54 time=41.235 ms 64 bytes from 208.68.240.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=51.199 ms So we obviously reach it, even if we can't trace the entire route. And I don't have u/l d/l issues. ID: 1120687 ·

Jim_S Send message Joined: 23 Feb 00 Posts: 4705 Credit: 64,560,357 RAC: 31	Message 1120696 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 2:48:30 UTC - in response to Message 1120648. Last modified: 24 Jun 2011, 2:50:11 UTC Command prompt commands, ipconfig/flushdns did nothing. tracert to berkeley stopped about 3 hops short. (208.68.240.20) Ping timed out 5 times in a row. (208.68.240.20) I would hate to detach/Reattach and lose all of the work on my boxes. I don't want to reset S@H. All of my equiptment checked out. My ISP and or firewalls aren't the problem.(Called my ISP) And ALL of my other projects are having a Blast. I don't know what to do...I'm Stumped. :(( Only a guess, but could it be the old problem with DNS not resolving properly? Try entering these lines in the HOSTS file: 208.68.240.16 setiboincdata.ssl.berkeley.edu 208.68.240.20 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu 208.68.240.13 boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu And restart Boinc. Where do I find the HOSTS file? I Desire Peace and Justice, Jim Scott (Mod-Ret.) ID: 1120696 ·

Sutaru Tsureku Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5	Message 1120699 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 3:01:26 UTC - in response to Message 1120696. Last modified: 24 Jun 2011, 3:07:34 UTC Command prompt commands, ipconfig/flushdns did nothing. tracert to berkeley stopped about 3 hops short. (208.68.240.20) Ping timed out 5 times in a row. (208.68.240.20) I would hate to detach/Reattach and lose all of the work on my boxes. I don't want to reset S@H. All of my equiptment checked out. My ISP and or firewalls aren't the problem.(Called my ISP) And ALL of my other projects are having a Blast. I don't know what to do...I'm Stumped. :(( Only a guess, but could it be the old problem with DNS not resolving properly? Try entering these lines in the HOSTS file: 208.68.240.16 setiboincdata.ssl.berkeley.edu 208.68.240.20 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu 208.68.240.13 boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu And restart Boinc. Where do I find the HOSTS file? At WinXP I (you have also this OS) have the hosts file here: C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\hosts Read carefully the description in this file before you edit it. *- Best regards!* -** Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. - ID: 1120699 ·

Sutaru Tsureku Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5	Message 1120701 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 3:07:00 UTC - in response to Message 1120699. BTW. Maybe test the recommended BOINC version 6.12.26 . Maybe it work better. *- Best regards!* -** Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. - ID: 1120701 ·

Jim_S Send message Joined: 23 Feb 00 Posts: 4705 Credit: 64,560,357 RAC: 31	Message 1120707 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 3:34:19 UTC - in response to Message 1120701. BTW. Maybe test the recommended BOINC version 6.12.26 . Maybe it work better. *- Best regards!* - Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. - Thanks Sutaru, I think I will try that in the morning when I'm not worn out. It sounds safer. Also Thanks very much for your help. Jim Scott I Desire Peace and Justice**, Jim Scott (Mod-Ret.) ID: 1120707 ·

Skywalker66 @ Berlin Send message Joined: 31 Jan 01 Posts: 78 Credit: 27,692,349 RAC: 0	Message 1120766 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 6:36:34 UTC - in response to Message 1120648. Command prompt commands, ipconfig/flushdns did nothing. tracert to berkeley stopped about 3 hops short. (208.68.240.20) Ping timed out 5 times in a row. (208.68.240.20) I would hate to detach/Reattach and lose all of the work on my boxes. I don't want to reset S@H. All of my equiptment checked out. My ISP and or firewalls aren't the problem.(Called my ISP) And ALL of my other projects are having a Blast. I don't know what to do...I'm Stumped. :(( Only a guess, but could it be the old problem with DNS not resolving properly? Try entering these lines in the HOSTS file: 208.68.240.16 setiboincdata.ssl.berkeley.edu 208.68.240.20 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu 208.68.240.13 boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu And restart Boinc. i have make it and it did not clean the problem ID: 1120766 ·

Link Send message Joined: 18 Sep 03 Posts: 834 Credit: 1,807,369 RAC: 0	Message 1120784 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 7:41:36 UTC - in response to Message 1120766. Try entering these lines in the HOSTS file: 208.68.240.16 setiboincdata.ssl.berkeley.edu 208.68.240.20 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu 208.68.240.13 boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu And restart Boinc. i have make it and it did not clean the problem Can you actually ping setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu or the corresponding IP? ID: 1120784 ·

Highlander Send message Joined: 5 Oct 99 Posts: 167 Credit: 37,987,668 RAC: 16	Message 1120796 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 8:50:58 UTC Can u please also test it with: ping -l 1500 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu (after the dash, this is a small L :-) ) - Performance is not a simple linear function of the number of CPUs you throw at the problem. - ID: 1120796 ·

Skywalker66 @ Berlin Send message Joined: 31 Jan 01 Posts: 78 Credit: 27,692,349 RAC: 0	Message 1120798 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 9:20:22 UTC - in response to Message 1120796. Can u please also test it with: ping -l 1500 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu (after the dash, this is a small L :-) ) ping -l 1500 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu Ping setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.20] mit 1500 Bytes Daten: ZeitÃ¼berschreitung der Anforderung. /timeoverflow ZeitÃ¼berschreitung der Anforderung. /timeoverflow ZeitÃ¼berschreitung der Anforderung. /timeoverflow ZeitÃ¼berschreitung der Anforderung. /timeoverflow Ping-Statistik fÃ¼r 208.68.240.20: Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 0, Verloren = 4 (100% Verlust/Lost), ID: 1120798 ·

Skywalker66 @ Berlin Send message Joined: 31 Jan 01 Posts: 78 Credit: 27,692,349 RAC: 0	Message 1120803 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 9:35:59 UTC - in response to Message 1120796. Can u please also test it with: ping -l 1500 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu (after the dash, this is a small L :-) ) Highlander, you bring me to a new idea to test, like the Server is to heavy busy.... ping -w 103000 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu Ping setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.20] mit 32 Bytes Daten: ZeitÃ¼berschreitung der Anforderung. this is not the right thing ID: 1120803 ·

Gundolf Jahn Send message Joined: 19 Sep 00 Posts: 3184 Credit: 446,358 RAC: 0	Message 1120823 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 10:51:06 UTC - in response to Message 1120796. Can u please also test it with: ping -l 1500 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu (after the dash, this is a small L :-) ) At least the German ping version needs the -f flag in conjunction with the -l flag: ping -a -l 1448 -f 208.68.240.20 Ping setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.20] mit 1448 Bytes Daten: Antwort von 208.68.240.20: Bytes=1448 Zeit=245ms TTL=53 With -l 1449, I get Paket mÃ¼sste fragmentiert werden, DF-Flag ist jedoch gesetzt. GruÃŸ, Gundolf ID: 1120823 ·

Highlander Send message Joined: 5 Oct 99 Posts: 167 Credit: 37,987,668 RAC: 16	Message 1120845 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 13:06:24 UTC Yes, Gundolf, your right, -f Flag with -l is needed to see, if the packets from our clients to berkeley are somewhere dropped due to fragmented packets. But to come to a result, this is a little difficult to analyze this behaviour, cause in the end it can also be "only" a bad routing table ... - Performance is not a simple linear function of the number of CPUs you throw at the problem. - ID: 1120845 ·

Skywalker66 @ Berlin Send message Joined: 31 Jan 01 Posts: 78 Credit: 27,692,349 RAC: 0	Message 1120853 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 13:36:13 UTC - in response to Message 1120823. Can u please also test it with: ping -l 1500 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu (after the dash, this is a small L :-) ) At least the German ping version needs the -f flag in conjunction with the -l flag: ping -a -l 1448 -f 208.68.240.20 Ping setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.20] mit 1448 Bytes Daten: Antwort von 208.68.240.20: Bytes=1448 Zeit=245ms TTL=53 With -l 1449, I get Paket mÃ¼sste fragmentiert werden, DF-Flag ist jedoch gesetzt. GruÃŸ, Gundolf ping -a -l 1448 -f 208.68.240.20 Ping setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.20] mit 1448 Bytes Daten: ZeitÃ¼berschreitung der Anforderung. ZeitÃ¼berschreitung der Anforderung. ZeitÃ¼berschreitung der Anforderung. ZeitÃ¼berschreitung der Anforderung. Ping-Statistik fÃ¼r 208.68.240.20: Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 0, Verloren = 4 (100% Verlust), and i have contact my provider, there no changes or test in the last time, have spoken with a technican ... so i make easy on this time the question when IPv6 starts ;-) ID: 1120853 ·

Jim_S Send message Joined: 23 Feb 00 Posts: 4705 Credit: 64,560,357 RAC: 31	Message 1120862 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 14:00:16 UTC - in response to Message 1120707. Last modified: 24 Jun 2011, 14:11:18 UTC BTW. Maybe test the recommended BOINC version 6.12.26 . Maybe it work better. *- Best regards!* - Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. - Thanks Sutaru, I think I will try that in the morning when I'm not worn out. It sounds safer. Also Thanks very much for your help. Jim Scott Tried the upgrades...Still no Joy. <EDIT>Got the same ping and tracert results.</EDIT> Jim I Desire Peace and Justice**, Jim Scott (Mod-Ret.) ID: 1120862 ·

Sutaru Tsureku Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5	Message 1120874 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 14:20:12 UTC Last modified: 24 Jun 2011, 14:21:04 UTC You both don't have IPv6 enabled in the OS, or? ;-) --------------------------------------- What is if you test all the URLs from here in 'message 1120872', in your browser? *- Best regards!* -** Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. - ID: 1120874 ·

Lint trap Send message Joined: 30 May 03 Posts: 871 Credit: 28,092,319 RAC: 0	Message 1120914 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 15:55:32 UTC Last modified: 24 Jun 2011, 15:57:05 UTC FYI... Even though I do not have any connection problems with SETI, I have discovered that Pathping and Tracert are now useless here. My ISP is Comcast, and I saw some web talk about network changes being made to limit or prevent DDOS attacks that impact some network tools. Since I see failures/timeouts with these tools before reaching any external locations, I suspect that is what Comcast has done. I know pathping was working just fine here months ago. PING still works for me, and I can ping all the 208.68... addresses everyone is trying to reach without fail. Martin /edited/ ps. tested both with and without ipv6 installed in xp. ID: 1120914 ·

Jim_S Send message Joined: 23 Feb 00 Posts: 4705 Credit: 64,560,357 RAC: 31	Message 1120922 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 16:18:14 UTC - in response to Message 1120874. Last modified: 24 Jun 2011, 16:18:35 UTC You both don't have IPv6 enabled in the OS, or? ;-) --------------------------------------- What is if you test all the URLs from here in 'message 1120872', in your browser? *- Best regards!* - Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. - Yep IPV6 is installed. Jim I Desire Peace and Justice**, Jim Scott (Mod-Ret.) ID: 1120922 ·

Jim_S Send message Joined: 23 Feb 00 Posts: 4705 Credit: 64,560,357 RAC: 31	Message 1120923 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 16:27:17 UTC Your IPv4 address on the public Internet appears to be 66.38.56.134 No IPv6 address detected [more info] World IPv6 day is June 8th, 2011. No problems are anticipated for you with this browser, at this location. [more info] When a publisher offers both IPv4 and IPv6, your browser appears to be happy to take the IPv4 site without delay. Connections to IPv6-only sites are timing out. Any web site that is IPv6 only, will appear to be down to you. Your DNS server (possibly run by your ISP) appears to have no access to the IPv6 Internet, or is not configured to use it. This may in the future restrict your ability to reach IPv6-only sites. [more info] Your readiness scores 10/10 for your IPv4 stability and readiness, when publishers offer both IPv4 and IPv6 0/10 for your IPv6 stability and readiness, when publishers are forced to go IPv6 only Click to see test data I Desire Peace and Justice, Jim Scott (Mod-Ret.) ID: 1120923 ·

HAL9000 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57	Message 1120926 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 16:32:33 UTC I have noticed that for some people on their trace route the last hops looks like this. 14 84ms 86ms 90ms 208.68.243.254 15 89ms 84ms 88ms setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.20] However for some it looks a bit like this. 14 84ms 86ms 90ms 208.68.243.254 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * Sort of like their might be two different routes from 208.68.243.254. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ ID: 1120926 ·

Skywalker66 @ Berlin Send message Joined: 31 Jan 01 Posts: 78 Credit: 27,692,349 RAC: 0	Message 1120968 - Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 17:16:03 UTC - in response to Message 1120874. You both don't have IPv6 enabled in the OS, or? ;-) --------------------------------------- What is if you test all the URLs from here in 'message 1120872', in your browser? *- Best regards!* -** Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. - no it is deinstalled, on Xp make ipV6 in the aktuall time surfing so slow, without speed is double so high... ID: 1120968 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.