Black Holes |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Black Holes
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 . . . 9 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
The existence of black holes comes straight from the equations of General Relativity, which has survived all experimental tests done so far (see Gravity Probe 2 results). The only prediction to be confirmed is the existence of gravitational waves, which we are trying to discover at Einstein@home processing the data coming from laser interferometers in USA, Europe and Japan. But they are very weak and probably our presents instruments are unable to detect them. Unfortunately the Lisa project of a space interferometer is being scrapped for financial reasons. But so far GR has been confirmed by all tests. | |
| ID: 1127745 · | |
The details of your mathematics will be most interesting... Do tell? Martin, thats the one thing i'm not going to do. No, i'm not going to show anyone exactly how i arrived at the solution. But just as i have done here with the black hole problem, i'm more than willing to show people the solutions and scientifically explain where the error occurs! As i said, i have thousands of examples of mathematical problems in physics, chemical engineering and biological science that i can now solve with the help of God's book of scientific knowledge. Martin said: As for our present day mathematics to describe a 'black hole', well, simply put our present day mathematics do NOT describe black holes. The present mathematical descriptions suffer from undefined results for such extremes. Martin, Imagine that!! What a coincidence!! The mathematics break down when scientists try to calculate what happens in a black hole! Wow.... Isn't that what i just said in an earlier message! Its a mathematical error! Martin now it sounds like your trying to help me giving me evidence like that! Tullio, I'm really sorry to burst your bubble but God also told me that Albert Einstein's SR and GR were both wrong! Sorry about that buddy! New physics is on the way very soon! Don't be disappointed my friend, its all good! John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1127749 · | |
|
When I was a physics and astronomy editor at Mondadori I was plagued by authors trying to publish a book demonstrating that Einstein was wrong. They came all the way from Sicily to Milano with a perfectly typed text mostly enclosed in a black rectangle. I just read the first page and said Oh God! No one ever tried to demonstrate that Born, Heisenberg and Schroedinger were wrong, yet Quantum Mechanics and its Copenhagen interpretation by Bohr are much more debatable than relativity, which is rock solid. Einstein himself rocked it with his Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in 1935. "God does not play dice", he said. To which someone replied "God cast the die not the dice". I hope you agree. | |
| ID: 1127775 · | |
|
I just finished a book by John Moffat "Reinventing Gravity" Smithsonian Books. he is a Cambridge-educated professor at the University of Toronto. | |
| ID: 1127786 · | |
The AMS2 instrument on the ISS could tell us something on dark matter. As for the Higgs boson I am looking for it in the LHC data I am crunching. If I should find one I'll let you know. Cheers. Tullio ____________ | |
| ID: 1127799 · | |
The details of your mathematics will be most interesting... Do tell? OK... So this is all a mystical secret. You been using Morse Code and Guinness to decode the purrs of your cat? As for our present day mathematics to describe a 'black hole', well, simply put our present day mathematics do NOT describe black holes. The present mathematical descriptions suffer from undefined results for such extremes. Sorry, but no. Mathematics is completely accurate and precise to the extent that the mathematics describe where and how accurately the mathematics can be applied. For "Black Holes", perhaps a better description is to say that our present mathematics do not completely describe such a region, and that the mathematics tell us that area is not described. However, some equations have solutions where there is a "discontinuity" which can be interpreted to suggest the existence of black holes. Other equations may well yet be discovered in a form that do have useful solutions to describe the case of a black hole. However... We can use a mathematical tool whereby we look at what happens as you move close, very close, to such a mathematical discontinuity. What we see are exactly the same properties that astronomers also see for what we assume to be black holes. So... It's more a case of searching further for 'better' descriptions. Sorry, to be accepted in science, you need to fully explain every minutiae of your work so that others can reliably replicate your findings. You might say that is one of the scientific tests of a shared reality. ... God also told me that Albert Einstein's SR and GR were both wrong!... We know Einstein is wrong. It's just that Einstein is the one so far to be the most precisely wrong. Following his theories, we get the most accurate description of reality that we have so far found. I guess you can gain the ultimate reality in the froth in the bottom of a few glasses of Guinness. However, even if that were to be a shared experience, I'm very sure the participants would be deeply lost in non-shared (unique) realities. Sorry... That's neither science nor mathematics. It does make for a good Irish story! If that is, that is a story that can be told... ;-) Keep searchin', Martin ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3) | |
| ID: 1127831 · | |
When I was a physics and astronomy editor at Mondadori I was plagued by authors trying to publish a book demonstrating that Einstein was wrong. They came all the way from Sicily to Milano with a perfectly typed text mostly enclosed in a black rectangle. I just read the first page and said Oh God! No one ever tried to demonstrate that Born, Heisenberg and Schroedinger were wrong, yet Quantum Mechanics and its Copenhagen interpretation by Bohr are much more debatable than relativity, which is rock solid. Einstein himself rocked it with his Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in 1935. "God does not play dice", he said. To which someone replied "God cast the die not the dice". I hope you agree. Tullio, Maybe you should have read the paper those guys gave you. That sounds like you blatently ignored scientific evidence because you didn't understand the first page of the science paper! William Rothamel said: I just finished a book by John Moffat "Reinventing Gravity" Smithsonian Books. he is a Cambridge-educated professor at the University of Toronto. William Rothamel, See i'm not a lunatic. You just said you read a book that says there might be other alternatives to our current theory of gravity!! I'm glad someone understands that even the fundamental laws of science can change! Tullio, You need to get with reality. There is no Higgs boson!! Martin, Your just a lost case, i see no hope for you. Even when your presented with scientific explainations for new physics, you just keep repeating what you learned somewhere else. There is something more powerful than the written laws of science, its called using your logic and common sense! John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1127851 · | |
... See i'm not a lunatic. You just said you read a book that says there might be other alternatives to our current theory of gravity!! There are various theories proposed all the time. They then get tested against our observed reality and they will then gain acceptance or not depending on the results. The Pioneer spacecraft trajectory anomaly has been a good direct test of gravity for the scale of our solar system. That spawned various ideas for modifying one aspect of our calculations for gravity. Further tests and hypothesis and study have refined our understanding further. Our present equations for gravity have been found to still hold true for all presently studied cases. I'm glad someone understands that even the fundamental laws of science can change! At this point, I think we are using different meanings and understanding and that you are misusing the word "science". Your just a lost case, i see no hope for you. Even when your presented with scientific explainations for new physics, you just keep repeating what you learned somewhere else. There is something more powerful than the written laws of science, its called using your logic and common sense! Indeed so, there is completely no hope for me to be resurrected (or raptured) in (or into) any arbitrary contrived religious sense! My search is for a far deeper and unpolluted truth. Enjoy your new found world. Can you make money from your unique interpretations and your new found pseudo-science? Keep searchin', Martin ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3) | |
| ID: 1127868 · | |
|
Johnnie, my son, | |
| ID: 1127870 · | |
|
I think I have been clear enough. Let me post a final thought. No particle accelerator, including those used for cancer therapy, would work without special relativity. No Global Positioning System could work without General Relativity. So Relativity is part of our everyday world. To deny its validity is impossible. | |
| ID: 1127871 · | |
|
My final thoughts.... | |
| ID: 1127881 · | |
|
Amen! | |
| ID: 1127895 · | |
Guys, Not really... there where some individuals online here that got send to a mental institute that where far more entertaining...
There are quite a lot of lunatics out there claiming a lot of things... adding "science" to every second sentence doesn't make their claims true either.
No. Not entertaining at all. Just sad to see that kind of degradation of a human beeing.... So, i'd suggest adding some real value to your claims (some mathematical proof of your claims, formulas etc...) or let it go or maybe add even more 'science' in every sentence... maybe some will fall for that hokum ... ____________ Join BOINC United now! Auto eVB | Autoversicherung | |
| ID: 1128909 · | |
So, i'd suggest adding some real value to your claims (some mathematical proof of your claims, formulas etc...) or let it go or maybe add even more 'science' in every sentence... maybe some will fall for that hokum ... Crunch3r, Sure buddy!! Do you want to call my bluff and see if i'm a liar? Lets do that so! I offer you two options; 1. Read ALL of the messages in this thread and, as the title of the message suggests, i provide scientific reasons why astronomers and cosmologists "Think" black holes exist! But they are actually a mathematical error! I could only know that if God told me :) 2. Challenge me! Pick a problem from the Wikipedia "List of unsolved problems in physics"; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_physics Now that Wikipedia list is long and i can't grantee i will have the answer. But i will have a shot at the answer if its related to one of the area's of physics i was studying. I looked at many of the problems on that Wikipedia page, but not all of them. Pick one that YOU are personally familiar with! I can solve the vast majority of the problems on that page! John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1129068 · | |
|
To take care of the invidious doubters and outrageous criticism against your achievements. | |
| ID: 1129122 · | |
... I am hereby resubmitting my friend Daddio's recent work in this area and would like to have comments... Is that a burst of Schrödinger obliterating part of the 2-nd dimension due to uncertain containment from higher dimensions? Those Feynman strings can get rather knotty! Looks like the fall-out was terminal :-( Or is that from an exam paper?! Keep searchin', Martin ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3) | |
| ID: 1129150 · | |
Or is that from an exam paper?! ____________ Damsel Rescuer, Kitty Patron, Raccoon Friend, Uli Fan, Julie Supporter, ES99 Admirer, PETA Member, 1st Childhood | |
| ID: 1129156 · | |
|
It was a situation where I got a string of infinities and my solution blew up. So I guess I can't claim gauge symmetry for my new Darkion Theory. It could also be those damn fluxions creeping into my solution's equations. | |
| ID: 1129302 · | |
|
Daddio, | |
| ID: 1129410 · | |
|
http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2011/07/astronomers-find-largest-water-reservoir-ever-12-billion-years-in-the-past.ars | |
| ID: 1131802 · | |
Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Black Holes
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |